Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro vs Lenovo Tab P11 (2nd Gen)

59 out of 100
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
VS
49 out of 100
Lenovo Tab P11 (2nd Gen)

Here we compared two mid-range tablets: the 12.1-inch Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2) that was released on April 10, 2024, against the Lenovo Tab P11 (2nd Gen), which is powered by MediaTek Helio G99 and came out 1 year and 7 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each tablet
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
  • Water-resistant body (IP52 classification)
  • Comes with 2300 mAh larger battery capacity: 10000 vs 7700 mAh
  • Delivers 65% higher peak brightness (648 against 393 nits)
  • More recent OS version: Android 16 versus 13
  • 23% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (671K versus 545K)
  • Has 50% more RAM: 6GB versus 4GB
  • Has 2 SIM card slots
  • 23% higher pixel density (249 vs 203 PPI)
  • Supports higher wattage charging (33W versus 20W)
Reasons to consider the Lenovo Tab P11 (2nd Gen)
  • Shows 8% longer battery life (25:42 vs 23:43 hours)
  • Smaller footprint: 10% more compact case (70.7 vs 78.9 square inches)
  • Weighs 51 grams less

Review

Evaluation of Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro and Lenovo Tab P11 (2nd Gen) crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
📱 Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
6 / 128 GB
VS
4 / 64 GB
74.5
(Good)
Value Index
29.5
(Mediocre)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests

Display

Type IPS LCD IPS LCD
Size 12.1 inches 11.5 inches
Resolution 1600 x 2560 pixels 1200 x 2000 pixels
Aspect ratio 16:10 5:3
PPI 249 ppi 203 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (30-120 Hz) No
Max rated brightness 600 nits 400 nits
HDR support Yes, Dolby Vision No
Touch sampling rate 240 Hz -
Screen protection Corning Gorilla Glass 3 Tempered glass
Screen-to-body ratio 83.4% 82.6%
Display features - DCI-P3 -
Display tests
RGB color space 94% 133.5%
PWM Not detected Not detected
Response time 20 ms 33 ms
Contrast 1283:1 1459:1
Screen space comparison
Redmi Pad Pro
12.1″ (16:10 ratio) = 65.8 in2
Tab P11 (2nd Gen)
11.5″ (5:3 ratio) = 58.3 in2
~12% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
648 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3], [4]

Design and build

Height 280 mm (11.02 inches) 269.1 mm (10.59 inches)
Width 181.85 mm (7.16 inches) 169.4 mm (6.67 inches)
Thickness 7.52 mm (0.3 inches) 7.4 mm (0.29 inches)
Weight 571 g (20.14 oz) 520 g (18.34 oz)
Waterproof IP52 No
Rear material Metal Metal
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors Gray, Blue, Green Gray, Green
Fingerprint scanner No No
Area 509 cm2 (78.9 inches2) 456 cm2 (70.6 inches2)
Screen-to-body ratio
Tablet Ranking (99th and 124th place)
Android Tablet Ranking (74th and 96th place)

Performance

Chipset specifications of Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro and Lenovo Tab P11 (2nd Gen)
SoC
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 MediaTek Helio G99
Max clock 2400 MHz 2200 MHz
CPU cores 8 (4 + 4) 8 (2 + 6)
Architecture - 4 cores at 1.95 GHz: Cortex-A55
- 4 cores at 2.4 GHz: Cortex-A78
- 6 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A55
- 2 cores at 2.2 GHz: Cortex-A76
Manufacturing Samsung TSMC
Lithography process 4 nanometers 6 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Yes Yes
GPU
Graphics Adreno 710 Mali-G57 MC2
GPU shading units 256 64
GPU clock 940 MHz 1000 MHz
FLOPS ~481.3 GFLOPS ~128 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro and Lenovo Tab P11 (2nd Gen)
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
Compute Score (GPU) 2299 1879
Single-core score 1020 683
Multi-core score 2975 1865
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
671022
CPU 284982 250145
GPU - 43322
Memory 136497 116331
UX 249543 135748
Total score 671022 545546
Samples Less than 3 [178 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Stability 98% -
Graphics test 2 FPS -
Graphics score 252 -
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Stability - 99%
Graphics test - 2 FPS
Graphics score - 343
Sources: 3DMark [5], [6]
PCMark 3.0
12519
Web score 13114 9703
Video editing 7079 6207
Photo editing 22606 23237
Data manipulation 10865 8051
Writing score 13799 12175

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-06-11 (Minh Kha)AnTuTu671022
📘 2025-02-11 (OwO)GeekBench GPU2299
📘 2025-02-11 (OwO)GeekBench CPU1020 / 2975
Lenovo Tab P11 (2nd Gen)
No benchmark results yet

Memory

Configuration
RAM
RAM size 6 GB 4 GB
Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory clock 2133 MHz 2133 MHz
Channels 2 2
Storage
Storage size 128 GB 64 GB
Storage type UFS 2.2 UFS 2.2
Memory card MicroSD MicroSD
Memory card max size Up to 1536 GB Up to 1024 GB

Software

Operating system Android 14 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) Android 12 (Can be upgraded to Android 13)
ROM HyperOS 3 -
OS size 28 GB 20 GB

Battery

Capacity 10000 mAh 7700 mAh
Max charge power 33 W 20 W
Battery type Li-Po Li-Po
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging No No
Reverse charging No No
Fast charging Yes (28% in 30 min) Yes (50% in 60 min)
Full charging time 2:00 hr 2:30 hr
Battery life tests
Web browsing 07:10 hr 09:14 hr
Watching video 11:19 hr 12:17 hr
Gaming 05:30 hr 05:58 hr
Standby 149 hr 150 hr
General battery life
23:43 hr
25:42 hr

Main camera

Matrix 8 megapixels 13 megapixels
Image resolution 3264 x 2448 -
Zoom Digital Digital
Flash LED No
Stabilization Digital Digital
8K video recording No No
4K video recording No No
1080p video recording Up to 30FPS Up to 30FPS
Slow motion No -
Lenses 1) Standard: 8 MP
1) Standard: 13 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode -
Standard lens
Image resolution 8 MP 13 MP
Aperture f/1.8 f/2.4
Sensor size 1/4.0" (≈ 0.25 inch) -
Pixel size 1.12 micron -
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Digital Digital

Selfie camera

Megapixels 8 megapixels 8 megapixels
Image resolution 3264 x 2448 -
Aperture - f/2.0
Sensor CMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1/4.0" (≈ 0.25 inch) -
Pixel size 1.12 micron -
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/a/ac) Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.2 5.2
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
DisplayPort No No
GPS - GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
NFC* No No
Infrared port No No
Network
Number of SIM* 2 1
Type of SIM card No Nano
eSIM support* No No
Hybrid slot Yes No
LTE Cat* - 13
5G support Yes No

Sound

Speakers 4.0 4.0
Headphone audio jack Yes Yes
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes Yes
Speakers test
Max loudness
82.9 dB

Other

Category Mid-range Mid-range
Announced April 2024 September 2022
Release date April 2024 January 2023
Launch price (MSRP) $259 $369
Sensors - Hall-effect sensor
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Hall-effect sensor
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
Bundled charger Not included Yes, 10 W
Further details
Notes on Tab P11 (2nd Gen):
    - Has Precision Pen 2 support.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

After analyzing all the data, we think that the Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro is definitely a better buy.

Cast your vote

So, which tablet would you choose?
12 (92.3%)
1 (7.7%)
Total votes: 13

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!