Xiaomi Pad 8 vs Xiaomi Pad 6
Here we compared two mid-range tablets: the 11.2-inch Xiaomi Pad 8 (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4) that was released on September 25, 2025, against the Xiaomi Pad 6, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 and came out 2 years and 6 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Pad 8
- 2.3x better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (2296K versus 1005K)
- Newer Bluetooth version (v5.4)
- More recent OS version: Android 16 versus 14
- Compatible with Wi-Fi 7 wireless networks
- Has 33% more RAM: 8GB versus 6GB
- Supports higher wattage charging (45W versus 33W)
- Has a built-in infrared port
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 11.2 inches | 11 inches |
| Resolution | 2136 x 3200 pixels | 1800 x 2880 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 16:10 |
| PPI | 344 ppi | 309 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | No |
| Max rated brightness | 800 nits | 550 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, Dolby Vision | Yes, Dolby Vision |
| Touch sampling rate | 360 Hz | - |
| Screen protection | Tempered glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.7% | 83.6% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 | - DCI-P3 |
| RGB color space | - | 97% |
| PWM | - | 181600 Hz |
| Response time | - | 26 ms |
| Contrast | - | 832:1 |
Screen space comparison
Pad 8
11.2β³ (3:2 ratio) = 57.9 in2
Pad 6
11β³ (16:10 ratio) = 54.4 in2
~6% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 251.22 mm (9.89 inches) | 253.95 mm (10 inches) |
| Width | 173.42 mm (6.83 inches) | 165.18 mm (6.5 inches) |
| Thickness | 5.75 mm (0.23 inches) | 6.51 mm (0.26 inches) |
| Weight | 485 g (17.11 oz) | 490 g (17.28 oz) |
| Waterproof | No | No |
| Rear material | Metal | Metal |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | Black, Blue, Green | Silver, Gold, Blue |
| Fingerprint scanner | No | No |
| Area | 436 cm2 (67.5 inches2) | 419 cm2 (65 inches2) |
| Repairability | Average (2.74/5) | - |
| Drop resistance | Very good (B) Β· 208 drops | - |
Screen-to-body ratio
Tablet Ranking (25th and 95th place)
Android Tablet Ranking (19th and 71st place)
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 |
| Max clock | 3210 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 2 + 2) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 2 cores at 2.02 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 2 cores at 2.8 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 3 cores at 3 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 1 core at 3.21 GHz: Cortex-X4 |
- 4 cores at 1.8 GHz: Kryo 585 Silver (Cortex-A55) - 3 cores at 2.42 GHz: Kryo 585 Gold (Cortex-A77) - 1 core at 3.2 GHz: Kryo 585 Prime (Cortex-A77) |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | 4 MB |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 4 nanometers | 7 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Hexagon | Hexagon 698 |
| Graphics | Adreno 825 | Adreno 650 |
| GPU shading units | 1024 | 768 |
| GPU clock | 1150 MHz | 670 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~2355.2 GFLOPS | ~1029.1 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | - | 3371 |
| Single-core score | 2119 | 1315 |
| Multi-core score | 6769 | 3506 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 626036 | 376827 |
| GPU | 810590 | 151343 |
| Memory | 365628 | 182214 |
| UX | 493823 | 295214 |
| Total score | 2296077 | 1005598 |
| Samples | [6 tests] | [15 tests] |
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
| Graphics test | - | 6 FPS |
| Graphics score | - | 1147 |
Recent User Tests
Xiaomi Pad 8
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-08-12 -> Sakivuu | AnTuTu 11 | 2333032 |
| π 2026-08-09 -> Sakivuu | AnTuTu 11 | 2296077 |
| π 2026-07-15 -> AzuNoBel | AnTuTu 11 | 2284615 |
| π 2026-06-26 (yi) | Geekbench 6 GPU | 13259 |
| π 2026-06-26 (yi) | Geekbench 6 CPU | 2024 / 6171 |
Xiaomi Pad 6
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-09-21 -> sbx.777 | AnTuTu 12 | 1143560 |
| π 2026-08-04 (ΠΡΡΠ΅Π½) | AnTuTu 11 | 933942 |
| π 2026-07-21 (Peso Penguin) | AnTuTu 11 | 993797 |
| π 2026-06-27 (Aaru) | AnTuTu 11 | 932844 |
| π 2026-04-17 (Priyansh) | AnTuTu 11 | 1010069 |
Memory
Configuration
| RAM size | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5 |
| Memory clock | - | 3200 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage size | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 16 | Android 13 (Can be upgraded to Android 14) |
| ROM | HyperOS 3 | HyperOS 1.0 |
| OS size | - | 21 GB |
| OS updates | 0 years | - |
Battery
| Capacity | 9200 mAh | 8840 mAh |
| Max charge power | 45 W | 33 W |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse charging | Yes | No |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes (38% in 30 min) |
| Full charging time | - | 1:30 hr |
| Battery cycles | 1000 cycles | - |
| Web browsing | - | 11:51 hr |
| Watching video | - | 15:38 hr |
| Gaming | - | 07:18 hr |
| Standby | - | 139 hr |
General battery life
Main camera
| Matrix | 13 megapixels | 13 megapixels |
| Image resolution | - | 4160 x 3120 |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 30FPS | Up to 30FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Slow motion | - | 120 FPS (720p) |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 13 MP |
1) Standard: 13 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode | - |
| Image resolution | 13 MP | 13 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Sensor size | 1/3.06" (β 0.33 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 1.12 micron | - |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 8 megapixels | 8 megapixels |
| Aperture | f/2.3 | f/2.2 |
| Sensor | CMOS | - |
| Sensor size | 1/4.0" (β 0.25 inch) | 1/4.0" (β 0.25 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1.12 micron | - |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | Yes |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared port | Yes | No |
| Type of SIM card | No | No |
| 5G support | No | - |
Sound
| Speakers | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Announced | September 2025 | April 2023 |
| Release date | September 2025 | April 2023 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $310 | $299 |
| Successor | - | - Xiaomi Pad 8 |
| SAR (body) | 0.99 W/kg | - |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Hall-effect sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 45 W | Yes, 33 W |
Further details
Notes on Pad 8:
- The 128GB model uses UFS 3.1, while the 256GB model uses UFS 4.1.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the Xiaomi Pad 8 is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 36