Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE vs Galaxy Tab A9+ (Plus)
Here we compared two tablets: the 11-inch Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 680) that was released on August 15, 2023, against the Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ (Plus), which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 and came out 2 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
- Shows 17% longer battery life (29:44 vs 25:25 hours)
- Comes with 960 mAh larger battery capacity: 8000 vs 7040 mAh
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ (Plus)
- 42% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (582K versus 411K)
- Newer Bluetooth version (v5.1)
- Delivers 14% higher peak brightness (461 against 406 nits)
- Faster storage type - UFS 2.2 versus eMMC 5.1
- 2.2x faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 908 and 412 points
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | TFT LCD |
| Size | 11 inches | 11 inches |
| Resolution | 1200 x 1920 pixels | 1200 x 1920 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 8:5 |
| PPI | 207 ppi | 206 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | No |
| Max rated brightness | 400 nits | 500 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, HDR10 | No |
| Screen protection | Tempered glass | Tempered glass |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 82.2% | 80.9% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 | - |
| RGB color space | 93.1% | 94.2% |
| PWM | Not detected | Not detected |
| Response time | 37 ms | 42 ms |
| Contrast | 1689:1 | 1409:1 |
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 255.53 mm (10.06 inches) | 257.1 mm (10.12 inches) |
| Width | 167.08 mm (6.58 inches) | 168.7 mm (6.64 inches) |
| Thickness | 7.36 mm (0.29 inches) | 6.9 mm (0.27 inches) |
| Weight | 478 g (16.86 oz) | 480 g (16.93 oz) |
| Waterproof | No | No |
| Rear material | Metal | Metal |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | Gray, Green, Purple | Silver, Gray, Blue |
| Fingerprint scanner | No | No |
| Area | 427 cm2 (66.2 inches2) | 434 cm2 (67.2 inches2) |
| Repairability | - | Average (2.81/5) |
Screen-to-body ratio
Tablet Ranking (131st and 126th place)
Android Tablet Ranking (103rd and 98th place)
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 |
| Max clock | 2400 MHz | 2200 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (4 + 4) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 4 cores at 1.9 GHz: Kryo 265 Silver (Cortex-A53) - 4 cores at 2.4 GHz: Kryo 265 Gold (Cortex-A73) |
- 6 cores at 1.8 GHz: Kryo 660 Silver (Cortex-A55) - 2 cores at 2.2 GHz: Kryo 660 Gold (Cortex-A78) |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 6 nanometers | 6 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Hexagon 686 | Hexagon 686 |
| Graphics | Adreno 610 | Adreno 619 |
| GPU shading units | 128 | 256 |
| GPU clock | 1114 MHz | 840 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~285.2 GFLOPS | ~430.1 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 348 | 1405 |
| Single-core score | 412 | 908 |
| Multi-core score | 1423 | 2072 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 173875 | 245267 |
| GPU | 27779 | 57538 |
| Memory | 99996 | 108723 |
| UX | 109370 | 170923 |
| Total score | 411020 | 582451 |
| Samples | [2 tests] | [14 tests] |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 7122 | 10572 |
| Video editing | 3683 | 4298 |
| Photo editing | 12514 | 22564 |
| Data manipulation | 5947 | 8881 |
| Writing score | 9135 | 13360 |
Recent User Tests
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2025-10-31 (Bobikbo17) | AnTuTu 11 | 411020 |
| π 2025-10-09 (Roman) | AnTuTu 11 | 408473 |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ (Plus)
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-09-23 (Ambar Anand) | AnTuTu 12 | 704103 |
| π 2026-08-15 (Julian Ludwig) | Geekbench 6 GPU | 1246 |
| π 2026-08-15 (Julian Ludwig) | Geekbench 6 CPU | 917 / 1939 |
| π 2026-07-31 (Samsung galaxy tab A9+) | Geekbench 6 CPU | 907 / 2014 |
| π 2026-07-31 (Samsung galaxy tab A9+) | AnTuTu 11 | 582451 |
Memory
Configuration
| RAM size | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory clock | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage size | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
| Memory card max size | Up to 1024 GB | Up to 1024 GB |
Software
| Operating system | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| ROM | HyperOS 1.0 | One UI 5.1 |
| OS size | 22 GB | 22.9 GB |
| OS updates | - | 5 years |
Battery
| Capacity | 8000 mAh | 7040 mAh |
| Max charge power | 18 W | 15 W |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse charging | No | No |
| Fast charging | Yes (24% in 30 min) | Yes (50% in 60 min) |
| Full charging time | 2:45 hr | 2:58 hr |
| Battery cycles | - | 1200 cycles |
| Web browsing | 10:41 hr | 08:57 hr |
| Watching video | 12:28 hr | 11:07 hr |
| Gaming | 06:20 hr | 05:44 hr |
| Standby | 183 hr | 155 hr |
General battery life
Main camera
| Matrix | 8 megapixels | 8 megapixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | No | No |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 30FPS | Up to 30FPS |
| Slow motion | No | No |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 8 MP |
1) Standard: 8 MP |
| Camera features | - | - |
| Image resolution | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | - |
| Sensor size | 1/4.0" (β 0.25 inch) | - |
| Autofocus | No | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 5 megapixels | 5 megapixels |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | - |
| Sensor | - | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/5.0" (β 0.2 inch) | - |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | No |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5.1 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | - | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared port | No | No |
| Number of SIM* | - | 1 |
| Type of SIM card | No | Nano |
| eSIM support* | - | Yes |
| Hybrid slot | - | No |
| LTE Cat* | - | 18 |
| 5G support | No | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| Headphone audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| FM radio | Yes | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Budget | Mid-range |
| Announced | August 2023 | October 2023 |
| Release date | September 2023 | October 2023 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $249 | $219 |
| Successor | - | - Samsung Galaxy Tab A11+ (Plus) |
| Sensors | - Hall-effect sensor - Accelerometer |
- Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 18 W | Not included |
Further details
Notes on Galaxy Tab A9+ (Plus):
- Doesn't have S Pen support.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
If the camera, performance, gaming, and connectivity are more important to you, then choose the Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ (Plus). But if the battery life is more of a priority β go for the Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 172