Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE vs Galaxy Tab A9+ (Plus)

48 out of 100
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
VS
49 out of 100
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ (Plus)

Here we compared two tablets: the 11-inch Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 680) that was released on August 15, 2023, against the Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ (Plus), which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 and came out 2 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each tablet
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
  • Shows 17% longer battery life (29:44 vs 25:25 hours)
  • Comes with 960 mAh larger battery capacity: 8000 vs 7040 mAh
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ (Plus)
  • 42% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (582K versus 411K)
  • Newer Bluetooth version (v5.1)
  • Delivers 14% higher peak brightness (461 against 406 nits)
  • Faster storage type - UFS 2.2 versus eMMC 5.1
  • 2.2x faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 908 and 412 points

Review

Evaluation of Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE and Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ (Plus) crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
πŸ“± Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
4 / 128 GB
VS
4 / 64 GB
67.7
(Good)
Value Index
103.0
(Excellent)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests

Display

Type IPS LCD TFT LCD
Size 11 inches 11 inches
Resolution 1200 x 1920 pixels 1200 x 1920 pixels
Aspect ratio 16:10 8:5
PPI 207 ppi 206 ppi
Refresh rate 90 Hz 90 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate No No
Max rated brightness 400 nits 500 nits
HDR support Yes, HDR10 No
Screen protection Tempered glass Tempered glass
Screen-to-body ratio 82.2% 80.9%
Display features - DCI-P3 -
Display tests
RGB color space 93.1% 94.2%
PWM Not detected Not detected
Response time 37 ms 42 ms
Contrast 1689:1 1409:1
Peak brightness test (auto)
406 nits
461 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3], [4]

Design and build

Height 255.53 mm (10.06 inches) 257.1 mm (10.12 inches)
Width 167.08 mm (6.58 inches) 168.7 mm (6.64 inches)
Thickness 7.36 mm (0.29 inches) 6.9 mm (0.27 inches)
Weight 478 g (16.86 oz) 480 g (16.93 oz)
Waterproof No No
Rear material Metal Metal
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors Gray, Green, Purple Silver, Gray, Blue
Fingerprint scanner No No
Area 427 cm2 (66.2 inches2) 434 cm2 (67.2 inches2)
Repairability - Average (2.81/5)
Screen-to-body ratio
Tablet Ranking (131st and 126th place)
Android Tablet Ranking (103rd and 98th place)

Performance

Chipset specifications of Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE and Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ (Plus)
SoC
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
Max clock 2400 MHz 2200 MHz
CPU cores 8 (4 + 4) 8 (2 + 6)
Architecture - 4 cores at 1.9 GHz: Kryo 265 Silver (Cortex-A53)
- 4 cores at 2.4 GHz: Kryo 265 Gold (Cortex-A73)
- 6 cores at 1.8 GHz: Kryo 660 Silver (Cortex-A55)
- 2 cores at 2.2 GHz: Kryo 660 Gold (Cortex-A78)
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 6 nanometers 6 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 686 Hexagon 686
GPU
Graphics Adreno 610 Adreno 619
GPU shading units 128 256
GPU clock 1114 MHz 840 MHz
FLOPS ~285.2 GFLOPS ~430.1 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE and Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ (Plus)
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
Compute Score (GPU) 348 1405
Single-core score 412 908
Multi-core score 1423 2072
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
411020
582451
CPU 173875 245267
GPU 27779 57538
Memory 99996 108723
UX 109370 170923
Total score 411020 582451
Samples [2 tests] [14 tests]
PCMark 3.0
Web score 7122 10572
Video editing 3683 4298
Photo editing 12514 22564
Data manipulation 5947 8881
Writing score 9135 13360

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2025-10-31 (Bobikbo17)AnTuTu 11411020
πŸ“˜ 2025-10-09 (Roman)AnTuTu 11408473
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ (Plus)
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-23 (Ambar Anand)AnTuTu 12704103
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-15 (Julian Ludwig)Geekbench 6 GPU1246
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-15 (Julian Ludwig)Geekbench 6 CPU917 / 1939
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-31 (Samsung galaxy tab A9+)Geekbench 6 CPU907 / 2014
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-31 (Samsung galaxy tab A9+)AnTuTu 11582451

Memory

Configuration
RAM
RAM size 4 GB 4 GB
Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory clock 2133 MHz 2133 MHz
Channels 2 2
Storage
Storage size 128 GB 64 GB
Storage type eMMC 5.1 UFS 2.2
Memory card MicroSD MicroSD
Memory card max size Up to 1024 GB Up to 1024 GB

Software

Operating system Android 13 Android 13
ROM HyperOS 1.0 One UI 5.1
OS size 22 GB 22.9 GB
OS updates - 5 years

Battery

Capacity 8000 mAh 7040 mAh
Max charge power 18 W 15 W
Battery type Li-Po Li-Ion
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging No No
Reverse charging No No
Fast charging Yes (24% in 30 min) Yes (50% in 60 min)
Full charging time 2:45 hr 2:58 hr
Battery cycles - 1200 cycles
Battery life tests
Web browsing 10:41 hr 08:57 hr
Watching video 12:28 hr 11:07 hr
Gaming 06:20 hr 05:44 hr
Standby 183 hr 155 hr
General battery life
29:44 hr

Main camera

Matrix 8 megapixels 8 megapixels
Zoom Digital Digital
Flash No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
8K video recording No No
4K video recording No No
1080p video recording Up to 30FPS Up to 30FPS
Slow motion No No
Lenses 1) Standard: 8 MP
1) Standard: 8 MP
Camera features - -
Standard lens
Image resolution 8 MP 8 MP
Aperture f/2.0 -
Sensor size 1/4.0" (β‰ˆ 0.25 inch) -
Autofocus No Phase autofocus
Stabilization Digital Digital

Selfie camera

Megapixels 5 megapixels 5 megapixels
Aperture f/2.2 -
Sensor - CMOS
Sensor size 1/5.0" (β‰ˆ 0.2 inch) -
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital No
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5 5.1
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
DisplayPort No No
GPS - GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
NFC* No No
Infrared port No No
Network
Number of SIM* - 1
Type of SIM card No Nano
eSIM support* - Yes
Hybrid slot - No
LTE Cat* - 18
5G support No Yes

Sound

Speakers 4.0 4.0
Headphone audio jack Yes Yes
FM radio Yes No
Dolby Atmos Yes Yes
Speakers test
Max loudness
88.3 dB
89.3 dB

Other

Category Budget Mid-range
Announced August 2023 October 2023
Release date September 2023 October 2023
Launch price (MSRP) $249 $219
Successor - - Samsung Galaxy Tab A11+ (Plus)
Sensors - Hall-effect sensor
- Accelerometer
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
Bundled charger Yes, 18 W Not included
Further details
Notes on Galaxy Tab A9+ (Plus):
    - Doesn't have S Pen support.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

If the camera, performance, gaming, and connectivity are more important to you, then choose the Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ (Plus). But if the battery life is more of a priority – go for the Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE.

Cast your vote

So, which tablet would you choose?
39 (22.7%)
133 (77.3%)
Total votes: 172

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Edward Camilleri July 18, 2025 at 07:59 AM
I chose Xiaomi because cheaper (at least in my country $60) and the difference isn't that much at this category. I always check price to spec since these tablets are basic level.
+2 Reply
Avatar
jaden September 9, 2024 at 04:01 PM
I meant that I believe that the Samsung Galaxy A9+ is much better than the Redmi Pad se simply because of the specs and the fact that for some reason the Redmi Pad is actually more expensive than the a9+??????
+45 Reply