Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE vs Galaxy Tab A9

48 out of 100
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
VS
44 out of 100
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9

Here we compared two budget tablets: the 11-inch Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 680) that was released on August 15, 2023, against the Samsung Galaxy Tab A9, which is powered by MediaTek Helio G99 and came out 2 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each tablet
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
  • Has a 2.3 inches larger screen size
  • Comes with 2900 mAh larger battery capacity: 8000 vs 5100 mAh
  • Higher display refresh rate – 90 Hz
  • Shows 17% longer battery life (29:44 vs 25:21 hours)
  • 16% higher pixel density (207 vs 179 PPI)
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
  • Newer Bluetooth version (v5.3)
  • 24% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (508K versus 411K)
  • Delivers 15% higher peak brightness (465 against 406 nits)
  • Much smaller footprint: 38% more compact case (40.8 vs 66.2 square inches)
  • Faster storage type - UFS 2.2 versus eMMC 5.1
  • 77% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 729 and 412 points
  • Weighs 145 grams less

Review

Evaluation of Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE and Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
πŸ“± Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
4 / 128 GB
VS
4 / 64 GB
67.7
(Good)
Value Index
88.0
(Very good)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests

Display

Type IPS LCD TFT LCD
Size 11 inches 8.7 inches
Resolution 1200 x 1920 pixels 800 x 1340 pixels
Aspect ratio 16:10 5:3
PPI 207 ppi 179 ppi
Refresh rate 90 Hz 60 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate No No
Max rated brightness 400 nits 500 nits
HDR support Yes, HDR10 No
Screen protection Tempered glass Tempered glass
Screen-to-body ratio 82.2% 81.9%
Display features - DCI-P3 -
Display tests
RGB color space 93.1% 81.2%
PWM Not detected Not detected
Response time 37 ms 44 ms
Contrast 1689:1 1389:1
Screen space comparison
Redmi Pad SE
11β€³ (16:10 ratio) = 54.4 in2
Galaxy Tab A9
8.7β€³ (5:3 ratio) = 33.4 in2
~62% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
406 nits
465 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3], [4]

Design and build

Height 255.53 mm (10.06 inches) 211 mm (8.31 inches)
Width 167.08 mm (6.58 inches) 124.7 mm (4.91 inches)
Thickness 7.36 mm (0.29 inches) 8 mm (0.31 inches)
Weight 478 g (16.86 oz) 333 g (11.75 oz)
Waterproof No No
Rear material Metal Metal
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors Gray, Green, Purple Silver, Gray, Blue
Fingerprint scanner No No
Area 427 cm2 (66.2 inches2) 263 cm2 (40.8 inches2)
Visual size comparison
Screen-to-body ratio
Tablet Ranking (131st and 140th place)
Android Tablet Ranking (103rd and 110th place)

Performance

Chipset specifications of Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE and Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
SoC
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 MediaTek Helio G99
Max clock 2400 MHz 2200 MHz
CPU cores 8 (4 + 4) 8 (2 + 6)
Architecture - 4 cores at 1.9 GHz: Kryo 265 Silver (Cortex-A53)
- 4 cores at 2.4 GHz: Kryo 265 Gold (Cortex-A73)
- 6 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A55
- 2 cores at 2.2 GHz: Cortex-A76
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 6 nanometers 6 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 686 Yes
GPU
Graphics Adreno 610 Mali-G57 MP2
GPU shading units 128 64
GPU clock 1114 MHz 1000 MHz
FLOPS ~285.2 GFLOPS ~128 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE and Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
1943
Compute Score (GPU)
1294
Compute Score (GPU) 348 1294
Single-core score 412 729
Multi-core score 1423 1943
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
411020
508554
CPU 173875 214958
GPU 27779 35695
Memory 99996 119172
UX 109370 138729
Total score 411020 508554
Samples [2 tests] [3 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Graphics test - 1 FPS
Graphics score - 130
Sources: 3DMark [5], [6]
PCMark 3.0
8878
Web score 7122 8547
Video editing 3683 5137
Photo editing 12514 15786
Data manipulation 5947 7328
Writing score 9135 11901

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2025-10-31 (Bobikbo17)AnTuTu 11411020
πŸ“˜ 2025-10-09 (Roman)AnTuTu 11408473
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-16 (ZION)AnTuTu 12659300
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-09 (Ji-Su 8090)AnTuTu 11409449
πŸ“˜ 2025-10-30 (Trung)AnTuTu 11508554
πŸ“˜ 2025-09-20 (ZION)Geekbench 6 GPU1294
πŸ“˜ 2025-09-20 (ZION)Geekbench 6 CPU729 / 1943

Memory

Configuration
RAM
RAM size 4 GB 4 GB
Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory clock 2133 MHz 2133 MHz
Channels 2 2
Storage
Storage size 128 GB 64 GB
Storage type eMMC 5.1 UFS 2.2
Memory card MicroSD MicroSD
Memory card max size Up to 1024 GB Up to 1024 GB

Software

Operating system Android 13 Android 13
ROM HyperOS 1.0 One UI 5.1
OS size 22 GB -

Battery

Capacity 8000 mAh 5100 mAh
Max charge power 18 W 15 W
Battery type Li-Po Li-Ion
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging No No
Reverse charging No No
Fast charging Yes (24% in 30 min) Yes (50% in 60 min)
Full charging time 2:45 hr 2:30 hr
Battery life tests
Web browsing 10:41 hr 09:04 hr
Watching video 12:28 hr 13:21 hr
Gaming 06:20 hr 05:24 hr
Standby 183 hr 143 hr
General battery life
29:44 hr
25:21 hr

Main camera

Matrix 8 megapixels 8 megapixels
Zoom Digital Digital
Flash No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
8K video recording No No
4K video recording No No
1080p video recording Up to 30FPS Up to 30FPS
Slow motion No No
Lenses 1) Standard: 8 MP
1) Standard: 8 MP
Camera features - -
Standard lens
Image resolution 8 MP 8 MP
Aperture f/2.0 -
Sensor size 1/4.0" (β‰ˆ 0.25 inch) -
Autofocus No Phase autofocus
Stabilization Digital Digital

Selfie camera

Megapixels 5 megapixels 2 megapixels
Aperture f/2.2 -
Sensor - CMOS
Sensor size 1/5.0" (β‰ˆ 0.2 inch) -
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital No
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5 5.3
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
DisplayPort No No
GPS - GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
NFC* No No
Infrared port No No
Network
Number of SIM* - 1
Type of SIM card No Nano
eSIM support* - Yes
Hybrid slot - No
LTE Cat* - 13
5G support No No

Sound

Speakers 4.0 Stereo
Headphone audio jack Yes Yes
FM radio Yes No
Dolby Atmos Yes Yes
Speakers test
Max loudness
88.3 dB
86.6 dB

Other

Category Budget Budget
Announced August 2023 October 2023
Release date September 2023 October 2023
Launch price (MSRP) $249 $159
Successor - - Samsung Galaxy Tab A11
SAR (body) - 0.51 W/kg
Sensors - Hall-effect sensor
- Accelerometer
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
Bundled charger Yes, 18 W Not included
Further details
Notes on Galaxy Tab A9:
    - Doesn't have S Pen support.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

After analyzing all the data, we think that the Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE is definitely a better buy.

Cast your vote

So, which tablet would you choose?
66 (57.9%)
48 (42.1%)
Total votes: 114

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!