Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE vs Galaxy Tab A9
Here we compared two budget tablets: the 11-inch Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 680) that was released on August 15, 2023, against the Samsung Galaxy Tab A9, which is powered by MediaTek Helio G99 and came out 2 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
- Has a 2.3 inches larger screen size
- Comes with 2900 mAh larger battery capacity: 8000 vs 5100 mAh
- Higher display refresh rate β 90 Hz
- Shows 17% longer battery life (29:44 vs 25:21 hours)
- 16% higher pixel density (207 vs 179 PPI)
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
- Newer Bluetooth version (v5.3)
- 24% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (508K versus 411K)
- Delivers 15% higher peak brightness (465 against 406 nits)
- Much smaller footprint: 38% more compact case (40.8 vs 66.2 square inches)
- Faster storage type - UFS 2.2 versus eMMC 5.1
- 77% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 729 and 412 points
- Weighs 145 grams less
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | TFT LCD |
| Size | 11 inches | 8.7 inches |
| Resolution | 1200 x 1920 pixels | 800 x 1340 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 5:3 |
| PPI | 207 ppi | 179 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | No |
| Max rated brightness | 400 nits | 500 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, HDR10 | No |
| Screen protection | Tempered glass | Tempered glass |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 82.2% | 81.9% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 | - |
| RGB color space | 93.1% | 81.2% |
| PWM | Not detected | Not detected |
| Response time | 37 ms | 44 ms |
| Contrast | 1689:1 | 1389:1 |
Screen space comparison
Redmi Pad SE
11β³ (16:10 ratio) = 54.4 in2
Galaxy Tab A9
8.7β³ (5:3 ratio) = 33.4 in2
~62% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 255.53 mm (10.06 inches) | 211 mm (8.31 inches) |
| Width | 167.08 mm (6.58 inches) | 124.7 mm (4.91 inches) |
| Thickness | 7.36 mm (0.29 inches) | 8 mm (0.31 inches) |
| Weight | 478 g (16.86 oz) | 333 g (11.75 oz) |
| Waterproof | No | No |
| Rear material | Metal | Metal |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | Gray, Green, Purple | Silver, Gray, Blue |
| Fingerprint scanner | No | No |
| Area | 427 cm2 (66.2 inches2) | 263 cm2 (40.8 inches2) |
Visual size comparison
Screen-to-body ratio
Tablet Ranking (131st and 140th place)
Android Tablet Ranking (103rd and 110th place)
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 | MediaTek Helio G99 |
| Max clock | 2400 MHz | 2200 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (4 + 4) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 4 cores at 1.9 GHz: Kryo 265 Silver (Cortex-A53) - 4 cores at 2.4 GHz: Kryo 265 Gold (Cortex-A73) |
- 6 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A55 - 2 cores at 2.2 GHz: Cortex-A76 |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 6 nanometers | 6 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Hexagon 686 | Yes |
| Graphics | Adreno 610 | Mali-G57 MP2 |
| GPU shading units | 128 | 64 |
| GPU clock | 1114 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~285.2 GFLOPS | ~128 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 348 | 1294 |
| Single-core score | 412 | 729 |
| Multi-core score | 1423 | 1943 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 173875 | 214958 |
| GPU | 27779 | 35695 |
| Memory | 99996 | 119172 |
| UX | 109370 | 138729 |
| Total score | 411020 | 508554 |
| Samples | [2 tests] | [3 tests] |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Graphics test | - | 1 FPS |
| Graphics score | - | 130 |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 7122 | 8547 |
| Video editing | 3683 | 5137 |
| Photo editing | 12514 | 15786 |
| Data manipulation | 5947 | 7328 |
| Writing score | 9135 | 11901 |
Recent User Tests
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2025-10-31 (Bobikbo17) | AnTuTu 11 | 411020 |
| π 2025-10-09 (Roman) | AnTuTu 11 | 408473 |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-09-16 (ZION) | AnTuTu 12 | 659300 |
| π 2026-04-09 (Ji-Su 8090) | AnTuTu 11 | 409449 |
| π 2025-10-30 (Trung) | AnTuTu 11 | 508554 |
| π 2025-09-20 (ZION) | Geekbench 6 GPU | 1294 |
| π 2025-09-20 (ZION) | Geekbench 6 CPU | 729 / 1943 |
Memory
Configuration
| RAM size | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory clock | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage size | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
| Memory card max size | Up to 1024 GB | Up to 1024 GB |
Software
| Operating system | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| ROM | HyperOS 1.0 | One UI 5.1 |
| OS size | 22 GB | - |
Battery
| Capacity | 8000 mAh | 5100 mAh |
| Max charge power | 18 W | 15 W |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse charging | No | No |
| Fast charging | Yes (24% in 30 min) | Yes (50% in 60 min) |
| Full charging time | 2:45 hr | 2:30 hr |
| Web browsing | 10:41 hr | 09:04 hr |
| Watching video | 12:28 hr | 13:21 hr |
| Gaming | 06:20 hr | 05:24 hr |
| Standby | 183 hr | 143 hr |
General battery life
Main camera
| Matrix | 8 megapixels | 8 megapixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | No | No |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 30FPS | Up to 30FPS |
| Slow motion | No | No |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 8 MP |
1) Standard: 8 MP |
| Camera features | - | - |
| Image resolution | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | - |
| Sensor size | 1/4.0" (β 0.25 inch) | - |
| Autofocus | No | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 5 megapixels | 2 megapixels |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | - |
| Sensor | - | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/5.0" (β 0.2 inch) | - |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | No |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | - | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared port | No | No |
| Number of SIM* | - | 1 |
| Type of SIM card | No | Nano |
| eSIM support* | - | Yes |
| Hybrid slot | - | No |
| LTE Cat* | - | 13 |
| 5G support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | 4.0 | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| FM radio | Yes | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Budget | Budget |
| Announced | August 2023 | October 2023 |
| Release date | September 2023 | October 2023 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $249 | $159 |
| Successor | - | - Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 |
| SAR (body) | - | 0.51 W/kg |
| Sensors | - Hall-effect sensor - Accelerometer |
- Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 18 W | Not included |
Further details
Notes on Galaxy Tab A9:
- Doesn't have S Pen support.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 114