Intel Core i9 14900K vs Apple M3 Ultra

86 out of 100
Intel Core i9 14900K
VS
95 out of 100
Apple M3 Ultra

We compared two desktop CPUs: the 3.2 GHz Intel Core i9 14900K with 24-cores against the 4.05 GHz Apple M3 Ultra with 32-cores. On this page, you'll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.

Review

General overview and comparison of the processors
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Multi-Core Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of power consumption
Integrated Graphics
iGPU capabilities for gaming and 3D-intensive tasks
The "iGPU" and "Power Efficiency" have a minor impact on the NanoReview Score for desktop CPU.
NanoReview Final Score
Choose your main usage scenario to recalculate the Final Score and see which CPU suits your needs.
πŸ”Œ Usage Scenario:

Value for money (Beta)

Global average CPU prices are used by default! For better accuracy, enter your current prices and click β€œCalculate".
Currency
VS

Key Differences

What are the key differences between Ultra and 14900K
Advantages of Intel Core i9 14900K
  • Unlocked multiplier
Advantages of Apple M3 Ultra
  • More powerful Apple M3 Ultra GPU (80-core) integrated graphics: 28.3 vs 0.8 TFLOPS
  • Around 729.7 GB/s (814%) higher theoretical memory bandwidth
  • More modern manufacturing process – 3 versus 10 nanometers
  • Supports up to 512 GB LPDDR5-6400 RAM
  • Newer - released 1 year and 5 months later
  • Has 8 more physical cores

Test in Benchmarks

Comparing the performance of CPUs across various tasks

Cinebench

Reputable cross-platform benchmark for high-performance processors
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
M3 Ultra +9%
141
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
M3 Ultra +44%
2994
Cinebench 2026 (Multi) - 11987
Cinebench Scores (17th and 2nd place)

GeekBench v6

The new version of this benchmark emulates common operations often used in real-world apps
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
M3 Ultra +3%
3266
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
M3 Ultra +31%
29755
File compression 1940 MB/sec 2690 MB/sec
Clang compilation 194.6 Klines/sec 319.2 Klines/sec
HTML 5 Browser 589.2 pages/sec 819.6 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 638.4 Mpixels/sec 701.5 Mpixels/sec
Text processing 318.7 pages/sec 327.5 pages/sec
Background blur 71.7 images/sec 63.2 images/sec
Photo processing 191.6 images/sec 190.9 images/sec
Ray tracing 41.7 Mpixels/sec 61.5 Mpixels/sec
Sources: GeekBench [1], [2] – 644 samples

PassMark

Synthetic test that focuses on raw computational performance for low-level functions
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
M3 Ultra +8%
5064
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
M3 Ultra +25%
72850
Integer math 209.3 GOps/sec 181.6 GOps/sec
Floating point math 152.1 GOps/sec 183.5 GOps/sec
Find prime numbers 228M Primes/sec 1063M Primes/sec
Random string sorting 86.6M Strings/sec 123.1M Strings/sec
Data encryption 46.5 GBytes/sec 49.4 GBytes/sec
Data compression 785.8 MBytes/sec 1076.9 MBytes/sec
Physics 3098 Frames/sec 8863 Frames/sec
Extended instructions 44.7B Matrices/sec 55.1B Matrices/sec
Sources: PassMark [3], [4] – 13248 & 27 samples

Blender

3D rendering test that measures CPU performance in 3D modeling tasks (uses all cores)
Blender CPU
M3 Ultra +40%
717.7

Performance Per Watt

Shows the score you get per each watt of PL1 TDP
Cinebench 2024 / Watt 16.7 PPW 21.4 PPW
Geekbench 6 Multi / Watt 181 PPW 212.5 PPW
Passmark CPU Mark / Watt 466 PPW 520.4 PPW
Blender / Watt 4.1 PPW 5.13 PPW
These are rough calculations, as most CPUs surpass PL1 TDP wattage even in multicore workloads.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Intel Core i9 14900K
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-02-24 (Tanvir)Cinebench 2024129 / 2086
πŸ“˜ 2026-01-31 (Kreuz)Cinebench 2024128 / 1976
πŸ“˜ 2025-12-15 (Lil-Shady)Cinebench 2024136 / 2103
πŸ“˜ 2025-12-10 (Astromavic)Cinebench 2024134 / 1989
πŸ“˜ 2025-11-14 (cinebench251114)Cinebench 2024134 / 2114
Apple M3 Ultra
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2025-08-13 (Losito)Cinebench 202493 / 2422
πŸ“˜ 2025-03-17 (Luigi9212)Cinebench 2024148 / 2818
πŸ“˜ 2025-03-16 (Tyler)Cinebench 2024133 / 2753

Specifications

Full technical specification of Intel Core i9 14900K and Apple M3 Ultra

General

Vendor Intel Apple
Released October 16, 2023 March 5, 2025
Type Desktop Desktop
Instruction Set x86-64 ARMv8
Codename Raptor Lake Refresh Apple M3
Model number i9-14900K -
Integrated GPU UHD Graphics 770 Apple M3 Ultra GPU (80-core)
Rival Equivalent - AMD Ryzen 9 7900X -
Successor - Intel Core Ultra 9 285K -
Intel CPU rating (#7th place)

CPU

Performance Cores
P-Cores 8 24
P-Threads 16 24
Base Frequency (P) 3.2 GHz 4.05 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (P) 6 GHz -
Efficient Cores
E-Cores 16 8
E-Threads 16 8
Base Frequency (E) 2.4 GHz 2.75 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (E) 4.4 GHz -
Total
Total Cores 24 32
Total Threads 32 32
Bus Frequency 100 MHz 100 MHz
Multiplier 32x 40x
L1 Cache 80K (per core) 192K (per core)
L2 Cache 2MB (per core) 64MB (shared)
L3 Cache 36MB (shared) -
Unlocked Multiplier Yes No

Package

Transistors - 184 billions
Fabrication Process 10 nm 3 nm
TDP (PL1) 125 W 140 W
Max. Boost TDP (PL2) 253 W -
Socket LGA-1700 Apple M-Socket
Peak Temperature 100Β°C 100Β°C
Desktop CPU ranking (13th and 4th place)

iGPU

Integrated Graphics Intel UHD Graphics 770 Apple M3 Ultra GPU (80-core)
GPU Base Clock 300 MHz -
GPU Boost Clock 1650 MHz 1380 MHz
Shading Units 256 10240
TMUs 16 640
ROPs 8 320
Execution Units 32 1280
TGP 15 W 140 W
iGPU FLOPS
0.8 TFLOPS
M3 Ultra +3438%
28.3 TFLOPS

Memory Support

Memory Types - DDR5-5600
- DDR4-3200
- LPDDR5-6400
Max. Memory Size 192 GB 512 GB
Memory Channels 2 64
Max. Memory Bandwidth 89.6 GB/s 819.3 GB/s
ECC Support Yes No

Misc

Official Site Intel Core i9 14900K official page -
PCI Express Version 5.0 -
PCI Express Lanes 20 -

Cast your vote

Choose between two processors
16 (23.9%)
51 (76.1%)
Total votes: 67

Comments

So which CPU will you choose: Apple M3 Ultra or Intel Core i9 14900K?
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!