Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF vs AMD Ryzen 7 8700F
We compared two desktop CPUs: the 3.9 GHz Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF with 20-cores against the 4.1 GHz AMD Ryzen 7 8700F with 8-cores. On this page, you'll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.
Review
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Multi-Core Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of power consumption
The "iGPU" and "Power Efficiency" have a minor impact on the NanoReview Score for desktop CPU.
Choose your main usage scenario to recalculate the Final Score and see which CPU suits your needs.
Value for money (Beta)
Key Differences
Advantages of Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF
- Has 12 more physical cores
- Has 14 MB larger L3 cache size, helping fully utilize a high-end GPU in gaming
- More modern manufacturing process – 3 versus 4 nanometers
- Newer PCI Express version – 5.0
- Newer - released 5 months later
- 17% faster in a single-core Geekbench v6 test - 3206 vs 2745 points
- More than 10° C higher critical temperature
- 8% higher Turbo Boost frequency (5.4 GHz vs 5 GHz)
Test in Benchmarks
Comparing the performance of CPUs across various tasksCinebench
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
Cinebench Scores (21st and 168th place)
GeekBench v6
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
| File compression | 1610 MB/sec | 1450 MB/sec |
| Clang compilation | 192.6 Klines/sec | 107.4 Klines/sec |
| HTML 5 Browser | 481.8 pages/sec | 288.9 pages/sec |
| PDF Renderer | 600.3 Mpixels/sec | 406.9 Mpixels/sec |
| Text processing | 342.1 pages/sec | 283.4 pages/sec |
| Background blur | 96.8 images/sec | 67.1 images/sec |
| Photo processing | 172.7 images/sec | 112.9 images/sec |
| Ray tracing | 41.9 Mpixels/sec | 24 Mpixels/sec |
PassMark
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
| Integer math | 143.3 GOps/sec | 100.4 GOps/sec |
| Floating point math | 189.4 GOps/sec | 62.6 GOps/sec |
| Find prime numbers | 487M Primes/sec | 98M Primes/sec |
| Random string sorting | 79.7M Strings/sec | 45.4M Strings/sec |
| Data encryption | 48.2 GBytes/sec | 22.1 GBytes/sec |
| Data compression | 666.5 MBytes/sec | 378.2 MBytes/sec |
| Physics | 3629 Frames/sec | 1549 Frames/sec |
| Extended instructions | 54.5B Matrices/sec | 28.5B Matrices/sec |
Blender
Blender CPU
Performance Per Watt
| Cinebench 2024 / Watt | 16.5 PPW | 14.6 PPW |
| Geekbench 6 Multi / Watt | 174.2 PPW | 220.2 PPW |
| Passmark CPU Mark / Watt | 468.1 PPW | 475.1 PPW |
| Blender / Watt | 3.65 PPW | 3.52 PPW |
These are rough calculations, as most CPUs surpass PL1 TDP wattage even in multicore workloads.
Recent User Tests
Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-07-12 (AitorIrigoyen) | Cinebench 2024 | 137 / 2011 |
| 📘 2026-07-11 (AitorIrigoyen🇺🇾) | Cinebench 2024 | 137 / 2011 |
| 📘 2026-01-30 (Obfuscator) | Cinebench 2024 | 146 / 2162 |
| 📘 2026-01-07 (introfog) | Cinebench 2024 | 140 / 2062 |
| 📘 2025-12-31 (HomeHoney) | Cinebench 2024 | 139 / 2009 |
AMD Ryzen 7 8700F
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2025-11-27 (PanoS) | Cinebench 2024 | 110 / 947 |
| 📘 2025-11-27 (PanoS) | Cinebench 2024 | 108 / 935 |
Specifications
Full technical specification of Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF and AMD Ryzen 7 8700FGeneral
| Vendor | Intel | Amd |
| Released | October 11, 2024 | May 14, 2024 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Instruction Set | x86-64 | x86-64 |
| Codename | Arrow Lake | Zen 4 (Phoenix) |
| Model number | 265KF | 8700F |
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Rival Equivalent | - AMD Ryzen 7 9700X | - Intel Core i7 14700F |
| Successor | - | - AMD Ryzen 7 9700F |
Intel CPU rating (#6th place)
AMD Ryzen CPU ranking (#53rd place)
CPU
| P-Cores | 8 | 8 |
| P-Threads | 8 | 16 |
| Base Frequency (P) | 3.9 GHz | 4.1 GHz |
| Turbo Boost Frequency (P) | 5.4 GHz | 5 GHz |
| E-Cores | 12 | - |
| E-Threads | 12 | - |
| Base Frequency (E) | 3.3 GHz | - |
| Turbo Boost Frequency (E) | 4.6 GHz | - |
| Total Cores | 20 | 8 |
| Total Threads | 20 | 16 |
| Bus Frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Multiplier | 39x | 41x |
| L1 Cache | 112K (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| L2 Cache | 3MB (per core) | 1MB (per core) |
| L3 Cache | 30MB (shared) | 16MB (shared) |
| Unlocked Multiplier | Yes | Yes |
Package
| Transistors | - | 25 billions |
| Fabrication Process | 3 nm | 4 nm |
| TDP (PL1) | 125 W | 45-65 W (configurable) |
| Max. Boost TDP (PL2) | 250 W | 88 W |
| Socket | FCLGA-1851 | AM5 |
| Peak Temperature | 105°C | 95°C |
Desktop CPU ranking (12th and 73rd place)
Memory Support
| Memory Types | - DDR5-6400 | - DDR5-5200 |
| Max. Memory Size | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Memory Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
Misc
| Official Site | Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF official page | AMD Ryzen 7 8700F official page |
| PCI Express Version | 5.0 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express Lanes | 24 | 20 |
Cast your vote
Total votes: 7