Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF vs AMD Ryzen 7 9700X

We compared two desktop CPUs: the 3.9 GHz Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF with 20-cores against the 3.8 GHz AMD Ryzen 7 9700X with 8-cores. On this page, you'll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.

Review

General overview and comparison of the processors
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Multi-Core Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of power consumption
The "iGPU" and "Power Efficiency" have a minor impact on the NanoReview Score for desktop CPU.
NanoReview Final Score
Choose your main usage scenario to recalculate the Final Score and see which CPU suits your needs.
🔌 Usage Scenario:

Value for money (Beta)

Global average CPU prices are used by default! For better accuracy, enter your current prices and click “Calculate".
Currency
VS
103.4
(Excellent)
Value Index
83.3
(Good)

Key Differences

What are the key differences between 9700X and 265KF
Advantages of Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF
  • Has 12 more physical cores
  • More modern manufacturing process – 3 versus 4 nanometers
  • Supports up to 256 GB DDR5-6400 RAM
  • More than 10° C higher critical temperature
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 9700X
  • Includes an integrated GPU Radeon 610M
  • 2% higher Turbo Boost frequency (5.5 GHz vs 5.4 GHz)

Test in Benchmarks

Comparing the performance of CPUs across various tasks

Cinebench

Reputable cross-platform benchmark for high-performance processors
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
Cinebench 2026 (Single) - 760
Cinebench 2026 (Multi) - 4822
Cinebench Scores (21st and 90th place)

GeekBench v6

The new version of this benchmark emulates common operations often used in real-world apps
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
File compression 1610 MB/sec 1650 MB/sec
Clang compilation 192.6 Klines/sec 140.9 Klines/sec
HTML 5 Browser 481.8 pages/sec 323.7 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 600.3 Mpixels/sec 501 Mpixels/sec
Text processing 342.1 pages/sec 351.5 pages/sec
Background blur 96.8 images/sec 88.2 images/sec
Photo processing 172.7 images/sec 127.3 images/sec
Ray tracing 41.9 Mpixels/sec 30.6 Mpixels/sec
Sources: GeekBench [1], [2] – 4 samples

PassMark

Synthetic test that focuses on raw computational performance for low-level functions
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
Integer math 143.3 GOps/sec 119.8 GOps/sec
Floating point math 189.4 GOps/sec 78.8 GOps/sec
Find prime numbers 487M Primes/sec 190M Primes/sec
Random string sorting 79.7M Strings/sec 46.4M Strings/sec
Data encryption 48.2 GBytes/sec 21.7 GBytes/sec
Data compression 666.5 MBytes/sec 434.5 MBytes/sec
Physics 3629 Frames/sec 2214 Frames/sec
Extended instructions 54.5B Matrices/sec 35.1B Matrices/sec
Sources: PassMark [3], [4] – 3726 & 9483 samples

Blender

3D rendering test that measures CPU performance in 3D modeling tasks (uses all cores)
Blender CPU
455.75

Performance Per Watt

Shows the score you get per each watt of PL1 TDP
Cinebench 2024 / Watt 16.5 PPW 20.2 PPW
Geekbench 6 Multi / Watt 174.2 PPW 269.4 PPW
Passmark CPU Mark / Watt 468.1 PPW 568.6 PPW
Blender / Watt 3.65 PPW 4.63 PPW
These are rough calculations, as most CPUs surpass PL1 TDP wattage even in multicore workloads.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-07-12 (AitorIrigoyen)Cinebench 2024137 / 2011
📘 2026-07-11 (AitorIrigoyen🇺🇾)Cinebench 2024137 / 2011
📘 2026-01-30 (Obfuscator)Cinebench 2024146 / 2162
📘 2026-01-07 (introfog)Cinebench 2024140 / 2062
📘 2025-12-31 (HomeHoney)Cinebench 2024139 / 2009
AMD Ryzen 7 9700X
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-08-09 (none)Cinebench 2026705 / 4273
📘 2026-07-24 (NDHK)Cinebench 2026712 / 4879
📘 2026-05-28 (Curry)Cinebench 2024137 / 1147
📘 2026-05-26 (Worldbreaker76)Cinebench 2026779 / 5648
📘 2026-05-26 (Worldbreaker76)Cinebench 2024136 / 1323

Specifications

Full technical specification of Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF and AMD Ryzen 7 9700X

General

Vendor Intel Amd
Released October 11, 2024 June 3, 2024
Type Desktop Desktop
Instruction Set x86-64 x86-64
Codename Arrow Lake Zen 5 (Granite Ridge)
Model number 265KF -
Integrated GPU No Radeon 610M
Rival Equivalent - AMD Ryzen 7 9700X - Intel Core i7 14700K
Intel CPU rating (#6th place)
AMD Ryzen CPU ranking (#17th place)

CPU

Performance Cores
P-Cores 8 8
P-Threads 8 16
Base Frequency (P) 3.9 GHz 3.8 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (P) 5.4 GHz 5.5 GHz
Efficient Cores
E-Cores 12 -
E-Threads 12 -
Base Frequency (E) 3.3 GHz -
Turbo Boost Frequency (E) 4.6 GHz -
Total
Total Cores 20 8
Total Threads 20 16
Bus Frequency 100 MHz 100 MHz
Multiplier 39x 38x
L1 Cache 112K (per core) 80K (per core)
L2 Cache 3MB (per core) 1MB (per core)
L3 Cache 30MB (shared) 32MB (shared)
Unlocked Multiplier Yes Yes

Package

Fabrication Process 3 nm 4 nm
TDP (PL1) 125 W 65 W
Max. Boost TDP (PL2) 250 W 142 W
Socket FCLGA-1851 AM5
Peak Temperature 105°C 95°C
Die Size - 70.6 mm²
Desktop CPU ranking (12th and 34th place)

iGPU

Integrated Graphics - Radeon 610M
GPU Base Clock - 400 MHz
GPU Boost Clock - 2200 MHz
Shading Units - 128
TMUs - 8
ROPs - 4
Execution Units - 2
TGP - 15 W
iGPU FLOPS

Memory Support

Memory Types - DDR5-6400 - DDR5-5600
Max. Memory Size 256 GB 192 GB
Memory Channels 2 2
Max. Memory Bandwidth - 89.6 GB/s
ECC Support Yes Yes

Misc

Official Site Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF official page AMD Ryzen 7 9700X official page
PCI Express Version 5.0 5.0
PCI Express Lanes 24 28

Cast your vote

Choose between two processors
23 (67.6%)
11 (32.4%)
Total votes: 34

Comments

So which CPU will you choose: AMD Ryzen 7 9700X or Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF?
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!