Intel Core Ultra 9 285H vs AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D

We compared two 16-core laptop CPUs: the 2.9 GHz Intel Core Ultra 9 285H against the 2.5 GHz AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D. On this page, you'll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.

Review

General overview and comparison of the processors
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Multi-Core Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of power consumption
Integrated Graphics
iGPU capabilities for gaming and 3D-intensive tasks
NanoReview Final Score
Choose your main usage scenario to recalculate the Final Score and see which CPU suits your needs.
πŸ”Œ Usage Scenario:

Key Differences

What are the key differences between 9955HX3D and 285H
Advantages of Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
  • More powerful Arc Graphics 140T integrated graphics: 4.8 vs 0.6 TFLOPS
  • More modern manufacturing process – 3 versus 4 nanometers
  • Supports up to 128 GB LPDDR5-8400 RAM
  • More than 10Β° C higher critical temperature
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
  • Has 104 MB larger L3 cache size, helping fully utilize a high-end GPU in gaming
  • Unlocked multiplier
  • 10% faster in a single-core Geekbench v6 test - 3181 vs 2897 points

Test in Benchmarks

Comparing the performance of CPUs across various tasks

Cinebench

Reputable cross-platform benchmark for high-performance processors
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
Cinebench 2026 (Single) 506 -
Cinebench 2026 (Multi) 4879 -
Cinebench Scores (123rd and 14th place)

GeekBench v6

The new version of this benchmark emulates common operations often used in real-world apps
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
File compression 1510 MB/sec 1620 MB/sec
Clang compilation 129.7 Klines/sec 231.2 Klines/sec
HTML 5 Browser 425.7 pages/sec 343 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 522.7 Mpixels/sec 561.9 Mpixels/sec
Text processing 309.2 pages/sec 348.1 pages/sec
Background blur 73.9 images/sec 71.3 images/sec
Photo processing 159.5 images/sec 121.8 images/sec
Ray tracing 26.8 Mpixels/sec 56.2 Mpixels/sec
Sources: GeekBench [1], [2]

PassMark

Synthetic test that focuses on raw computational performance for low-level functions
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
Integer math 86 GOps/sec 222 GOps/sec
Floating point math 109.3 GOps/sec 143.8 GOps/sec
Find prime numbers 330M Primes/sec 525M Primes/sec
Random string sorting 41M Strings/sec 83.2M Strings/sec
Data encryption 26.2 GBytes/sec 39.3 GBytes/sec
Data compression 336.1 MBytes/sec 783.3 MBytes/sec
Physics 2512 Frames/sec 4676 Frames/sec
Extended instructions 26.8B Matrices/sec 62.6B Matrices/sec
Sources: PassMark [3], [4] – 2125 & 409 samples

Blender

3D rendering test that measures CPU performance in 3D modeling tasks (uses all cores)
Blender CPU
565.95

Performance Per Watt

Shows the score you get per each watt of PL1 TDP
Cinebench 2024 / Watt 24.9 PPW 28.8 PPW
Geekbench 6 Multi / Watt 381.6 PPW 268.2 PPW
Passmark CPU Mark / Watt 759.8 PPW 832.9 PPW
Blender / Watt 4.56 PPW 7.55 PPW
These are rough calculations, as most CPUs surpass PL1 TDP wattage even in multicore workloads.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-01-16 (AsNapur)Geekbench 6 CPU2756 / 16837
πŸ“˜ 2026-01-16 (AsNapur)Cinebench 2024122 / 1126
πŸ“˜ 2025-10-31 (Adi)Cinebench 2024114 / 804
πŸ“˜ 2025-09-19 (JacoIsHere)Geekbench 6 CPU2868 / 14847
πŸ“˜ 2025-08-07 (Himmanshu Chowdhury)Cinebench 2024117 / 1122
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2025-12-07 (Yolo)Cinebench 2024130 / 2160
πŸ“˜ 2025-10-21 (Sam)Cinebench 2024128 / 2105

Specifications

Full technical specification of Intel Core Ultra 9 285H and AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D

General

Vendor Intel Amd
Released January 6, 2025 January 7, 2025
Type Laptop Laptop
Instruction Set x86-64 x86-64
Codename Arrow Lake Zen 5 (Fire Range)
Model number 285H 9955HX3D
Integrated GPU Arc Graphics 140T Radeon 610M
Rival Equivalent - AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 -
Intel CPU rating (#46th place)
AMD Ryzen CPU ranking (#10th place)

CPU

Performance Cores
P-Cores 6 16
P-Threads 6 32
Base Frequency (P) 2.9 GHz 2.5 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (P) 5.4 GHz 5.4 GHz
Efficient Cores
E-Cores 10 -
E-Threads 10 -
Base Frequency (E) 2.7 GHz -
Turbo Boost Frequency (E) 4.5 GHz -
Total
Total Cores 16 16
Total Threads 16 32
Bus Frequency 100 MHz 100 MHz
Multiplier 29x 25x
L1 Cache 112K (per core) 80K (per core)
L2 Cache 2MB (per core) 1MB (per core)
L3 Cache 24MB (shared) 128MB (shared)
Unlocked Multiplier No Yes

Package

Fabrication Process 3 nm 4 nm
TDP (PL1) 35-45 W (configurable) 55-75 W (configurable)
Max. Boost TDP (PL2) 115 W 101 W
Socket FCBGA-2049 FL1
Peak Temperature 110Β°C 100Β°C
Laptop processors ranking (58th and 18th place)

iGPU

Integrated Graphics Arc Graphics 140T Radeon 610M
GPU Base Clock 300 MHz 400 MHz
GPU Boost Clock 2350 MHz 2200 MHz
Shading Units 1024 128
TMUs 64 8
ROPs 32 4
Execution Units 8 2
TGP 35 W 15 W
iGPU FLOPS
4.8 TFLOPS
0.6 TFLOPS

Memory Support

Memory Types - LPDDR5-8400
- LPDDR5x-8400
- DDR5-6400
- DDR5-5600
Max. Memory Size 128 GB 96 GB
Memory Channels 2 2
ECC Support No Yes

Misc

Official Site Intel Core Ultra 9 285H official page AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D official page
PCI Express Version 5.0 5.0
PCI Express Lanes 28 28

Cast your vote

Choose between two processors
12 (38.7%)
19 (61.3%)
Total votes: 31

Comments

So which CPU will you choose: AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D or Intel Core Ultra 9 285H?
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!