Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX vs AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
We compared two laptop CPUs: the 2.8 GHz Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX with 24-cores against the 2.5 GHz AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D with 16-cores. On this page, you'll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.
Review
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Multi-Core Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of power consumption
Integrated Graphics
iGPU capabilities for gaming and 3D-intensive tasks
Choose your main usage scenario to recalculate the Final Score and see which CPU suits your needs.
Key Differences
Advantages of Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX
- More powerful Arc Graphics (4-Cores) integrated graphics: 2 vs 0.6 TFLOPS
- Supports up to 256 GB DDR5-6400 RAM
- Has 8 more physical cores
- More modern manufacturing process β 3 versus 4 nanometers
- 2% higher Turbo Boost frequency (5.5 GHz vs 5.4 GHz)
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
- Has 92 MB larger L3 cache size, helping fully utilize a high-end GPU in gaming
Test in Benchmarks
Comparing the performance of CPUs across various tasksCinebench
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
Cinebench Scores (13th and 14th place)
GeekBench v6
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
| File compression | 1540 MB/sec | 1620 MB/sec |
| Clang compilation | 227 Klines/sec | 231.2 Klines/sec |
| HTML 5 Browser | 483.8 pages/sec | 343 pages/sec |
| PDF Renderer | 592.1 Mpixels/sec | 561.9 Mpixels/sec |
| Text processing | 350.1 pages/sec | 348.1 pages/sec |
| Background blur | 90.1 images/sec | 71.3 images/sec |
| Photo processing | 161.3 images/sec | 121.8 images/sec |
| Ray tracing | 50.5 Mpixels/sec | 56.2 Mpixels/sec |
PassMark
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
| Integer math | 154.3 GOps/sec | 222 GOps/sec |
| Floating point math | 193.9 GOps/sec | 143.8 GOps/sec |
| Find prime numbers | 457M Primes/sec | 525M Primes/sec |
| Random string sorting | 76.7M Strings/sec | 83.2M Strings/sec |
| Data encryption | 48.3 GBytes/sec | 39.3 GBytes/sec |
| Data compression | 628.2 MBytes/sec | 783.3 MBytes/sec |
| Physics | 3444 Frames/sec | 4676 Frames/sec |
| Extended instructions | 48.8B Matrices/sec | 62.6B Matrices/sec |
Blender
Blender CPU
Performance Per Watt
| Cinebench 2024 / Watt | 40.7 PPW | 28.8 PPW |
| Geekbench 6 Multi / Watt | 382.6 PPW | 268.2 PPW |
| Passmark CPU Mark / Watt | 1028.2 PPW | 832.9 PPW |
| Blender / Watt | 9.47 PPW | 7.55 PPW |
These are rough calculations, as most CPUs surpass PL1 TDP wattage even in multicore workloads.
Recent User Tests
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2025-04-19 (bikerboy80) | Cinebench 2024 | 126 / 2240 |
| π 2025-04-19 (bikerboy85) | Cinebench 2024 | 126 / 2240 |
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2025-12-07 (Yolo) | Cinebench 2024 | 130 / 2160 |
| π 2025-10-21 (Sam) | Cinebench 2024 | 128 / 2105 |
Specifications
Full technical specification of Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX and AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3DGeneral
| Vendor | Intel | Amd |
| Released | January 6, 2025 | January 7, 2025 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
| Instruction Set | x86-64 | x86-64 |
| Codename | Arrow Lake | Zen 5 (Fire Range) |
| Model number | 285HX | 9955HX3D |
| Integrated GPU | Arc Graphics (4-Cores) | Radeon 610M |
| Rival Equivalent | - AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX | - |
Intel CPU rating (#12th place)
AMD Ryzen CPU ranking (#10th place)
CPU
| P-Cores | 8 | 16 |
| P-Threads | 8 | 32 |
| Base Frequency (P) | 2.8 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| Turbo Boost Frequency (P) | 5.5 GHz | 5.4 GHz |
| E-Cores | 16 | - |
| E-Threads | 16 | - |
| Base Frequency (E) | 2.1 GHz | - |
| Turbo Boost Frequency (E) | 4.6 GHz | - |
| Total Cores | 24 | 16 |
| Total Threads | 24 | 32 |
| Bus Frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Multiplier | 28x | 25x |
| L1 Cache | 192K (per core) | 80K (per core) |
| L2 Cache | 2MB (per core) | 1MB (per core) |
| L3 Cache | 36MB (shared) | 128MB (shared) |
| Unlocked Multiplier | Yes | Yes |
Package
| Fabrication Process | 3 nm | 4 nm |
| TDP (PL1) | 45-55 W (configurable) | 55-75 W (configurable) |
| Max. Boost TDP (PL2) | 160 W | 101 W |
| Socket | FCBGA-2114 | FL1 |
| Peak Temperature | 105Β°C | 100Β°C |
Laptop processors ranking (19th and 18th place)
iGPU
| Integrated Graphics | Arc Graphics (4-Cores) | Radeon 610M |
| GPU Base Clock | 300 MHz | 400 MHz |
| GPU Boost Clock | 2000 MHz | 2200 MHz |
| Shading Units | 512 | 128 |
| TMUs | 32 | 8 |
| ROPs | 16 | 4 |
| Execution Units | 64 | 2 |
| TGP | 14 W | 15 W |
iGPU FLOPS
More info: Radeon 610M compared to Arc iGPU (4-Cores)
Memory Support
| Memory Types | - DDR5-6400 | - DDR5-5600 |
| Max. Memory Size | 256 GB | 96 GB |
| Memory Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Max. Memory Bandwidth | 102.4 GB/s | - |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
Misc
| Official Site | Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX official page | AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D official page |
| PCI Express Version | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express Lanes | 24 | 28 |
Cast your vote
Total votes: 601