Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX vs AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D

We compared two laptop CPUs: the 2.7 GHz Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX with 24-cores against the 2.5 GHz AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D with 16-cores. On this page, you'll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.

Review

General overview and comparison of the processors
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Multi-Core Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of power consumption
Integrated Graphics
iGPU capabilities for gaming and 3D-intensive tasks
NanoReview Final Score
Choose your main usage scenario to recalculate the Final Score and see which CPU suits your needs.
πŸ”Œ Usage Scenario:

Key Differences

What are the key differences between 9955HX3D and 275HX
Advantages of Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  • More powerful Arc Graphics (4-Cores) integrated graphics: 1.9 vs 0.6 TFLOPS
  • Supports up to 256 GB DDR5-6400 RAM
  • Has 8 more physical cores
  • More modern manufacturing process – 3 versus 4 nanometers
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
  • Has 92 MB larger L3 cache size, helping fully utilize a high-end GPU in gaming

Test in Benchmarks

Comparing the performance of CPUs across various tasks

Cinebench

Reputable cross-platform benchmark for high-performance processors
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
Cinebench 2026 (Single) 500 -
Cinebench 2026 (Multi) 7832 -
Cinebench Scores (30th and 14th place)

GeekBench v6

The new version of this benchmark emulates common operations often used in real-world apps
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
File compression 1480 MB/sec 1620 MB/sec
Clang compilation 216.2 Klines/sec 231.2 Klines/sec
HTML 5 Browser 435.5 pages/sec 343 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 545.5 Mpixels/sec 561.9 Mpixels/sec
Text processing 344.8 pages/sec 348.1 pages/sec
Background blur 78.6 images/sec 71.3 images/sec
Photo processing 156.4 images/sec 121.8 images/sec
Ray tracing 46.2 Mpixels/sec 56.2 Mpixels/sec
Sources: GeekBench [1], [2]

PassMark

Synthetic test that focuses on raw computational performance for low-level functions
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
Integer math 155.2 GOps/sec 222 GOps/sec
Floating point math 191.1 GOps/sec 143.8 GOps/sec
Find prime numbers 448M Primes/sec 525M Primes/sec
Random string sorting 74.3M Strings/sec 83.2M Strings/sec
Data encryption 47.1 GBytes/sec 39.3 GBytes/sec
Data compression 608.4 MBytes/sec 783.3 MBytes/sec
Physics 3335 Frames/sec 4676 Frames/sec
Extended instructions 47B Matrices/sec 62.6B Matrices/sec
Sources: PassMark [3], [4] – 5997 & 409 samples

Blender

3D rendering test that measures CPU performance in 3D modeling tasks (uses all cores)
Blender CPU

Performance Per Watt

Shows the score you get per each watt of PL1 TDP
Cinebench 2024 / Watt 35.3 PPW 28.8 PPW
Geekbench 6 Multi / Watt 371.8 PPW 268.2 PPW
Passmark CPU Mark / Watt 1013.7 PPW 832.9 PPW
Blender / Watt 6.54 PPW 7.55 PPW
These are rough calculations, as most CPUs surpass PL1 TDP wattage even in multicore workloads.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-04 (dante)Cinebench 2024133 / 2062
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-04 (dante)Cinebench 20260 / 0
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-04 (Sujan)Cinebench 2024139 / 2318
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-03 (ToadyBoi)Cinebench 2024139 / 2290
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-10 (itsved4nt)Cinebench 2026500 / 7832
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2025-12-07 (Yolo)Cinebench 2024130 / 2160
πŸ“˜ 2025-10-21 (Sam)Cinebench 2024128 / 2105

Specifications

Full technical specification of Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX and AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D

General

Vendor Intel Amd
Released January 6, 2025 January 7, 2025
Type Laptop Laptop
Instruction Set x86-64 x86-64
Codename Arrow Lake Zen 5 (Fire Range)
Model number 275HX 9955HX3D
Integrated GPU Arc Graphics (4-Cores) Radeon 610M
Rival Equivalent - AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX -
Intel CPU rating (#18th place)
AMD Ryzen CPU ranking (#10th place)

CPU

Performance Cores
P-Cores 8 16
P-Threads 8 32
Base Frequency (P) 2.7 GHz 2.5 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (P) 5.4 GHz 5.4 GHz
Efficient Cores
E-Cores 16 -
E-Threads 16 -
Base Frequency (E) 2.1 GHz -
Turbo Boost Frequency (E) 4.6 GHz -
Total
Total Cores 24 16
Total Threads 24 32
Bus Frequency 100 MHz 100 MHz
Multiplier 27x 25x
L1 Cache 192K (per core) 80K (per core)
L2 Cache 3MB (per core) 1MB (per core)
L3 Cache 36MB (shared) 128MB (shared)
Unlocked Multiplier Yes Yes

Package

Fabrication Process 3 nm 4 nm
TDP (PL1) 45-55 W (configurable) 55-75 W (configurable)
Max. Boost TDP (PL2) 160 W 101 W
Socket FCBGA-2114 FL1
Peak Temperature 105Β°C 100Β°C
Laptop processors ranking (25th and 18th place)

iGPU

Integrated Graphics Arc Graphics (4-Cores) Radeon 610M
GPU Base Clock 300 MHz 400 MHz
GPU Boost Clock 1900 MHz 2200 MHz
Shading Units 512 128
TMUs 32 8
ROPs 16 4
Execution Units 64 2
TGP 14 W 15 W
iGPU FLOPS
1.9 TFLOPS
0.6 TFLOPS

Memory Support

Memory Types - DDR5-6400 - DDR5-5600
Max. Memory Size 256 GB 96 GB
Memory Channels 2 2
Max. Memory Bandwidth 102.4 GB/s -
ECC Support No Yes

Misc

Official Site Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX official page AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D official page
PCI Express Version 5.0 5.0
PCI Express Lanes 24 28

Cast your vote

Choose between two processors
147 (29.8%)
346 (70.2%)
Total votes: 493

Comments

So which CPU will you choose: AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D or Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX?
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
John August 5, 2026 at 12:41 AM
as an owner of a Legion Pro 5i equipped with 275hx and 5070ti. This laptop is a amazing gaming machine, but the battery life is hot garbage. When unplug, it became a stuttering mess, Even running VSCode would have frequent stutters (SSH to another machine). It would last about 3 hours with dGPU disabled, and 1 hours with dGPU driving the display. (Which is my main problem really, cuz everytime advanced optimus switched the display it would enable HDR, and I hate HDR (im not gonna get into why), and I use 170w power adapter in the office (300w at home) and it would disable the dGPU unless I select the dGPU mode, so it forced me to use dGPU mode all the time. (Restarting to switch the mode would be a hustle (restarting apps, stuff)) So in my everyday usages it would last me 1 hour or less.
+3 Reply
Avatar
Yousef May 7, 2026 at 02:06 PM
L2 cache info is wrong here also
0 Reply
Serhii May 8, 2026 at 06:15 AM
Specs updated. Thank you!
0 Reply
Avatar
Egemen January 9, 2026 at 05:48 PM
I prefer raw and high performance. AMD did good, also i am typing this message from a laptop that own 9955HX3D. :)
+12 Reply
Avatar
Euphoria September 12, 2025 at 03:59 AM
In laptop, you need low thermal, not performance, intel did it better with low thermal in same performance.
+37 Reply
Avatar
Nko March 2, 2025 at 08:08 AM
Ultra 9 for laptops. Power efficiency for gpu
+190 Reply