Intel Core Ultra 9 285H vs AMD Ryzen AI 9 465

We compared two laptop CPUs: the 2.9 GHz Intel Core Ultra 9 285H with 16-cores against the 2.0 GHz AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 with 10-cores. On this page, you'll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.

Review

General overview and comparison of the processors
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Multi-Core Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of power consumption
Integrated Graphics
iGPU capabilities for gaming and 3D-intensive tasks
NanoReview Final Score
Choose your main usage scenario to recalculate the Final Score and see which CPU suits your needs.
πŸ”Œ Usage Scenario:

Key Differences

What are the key differences between 465 and 285H
Advantages of Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
  • Has 6 more physical cores
  • More modern manufacturing process – 3 versus 4 nanometers
  • Newer PCI Express version – 5.0
  • More than 10Β° C higher critical temperature
  • 8% higher Turbo Boost frequency (5.4 GHz vs 5 GHz)
Advantages of AMD Ryzen AI 9 465
  • Newer - released 1 year later
  • Supports up to 256 GB DDR5-5600 RAM

Test in Benchmarks

Comparing the performance of CPUs across various tasks

Cinebench

Reputable cross-platform benchmark for high-performance processors
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
Cinebench 2026 (Single) 506 451
Cinebench 2026 (Multi) 4879 4354
Cinebench Scores (123rd and 134th place)

GeekBench v6

The new version of this benchmark emulates common operations often used in real-world apps
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
File compression 1510 MB/sec 1260 MB/sec
Clang compilation 129.7 Klines/sec 104.8 Klines/sec
HTML 5 Browser 425.7 pages/sec 307.9 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 522.7 Mpixels/sec 431.6 Mpixels/sec
Text processing 309.2 pages/sec 310 pages/sec
Background blur 73.9 images/sec 59.4 images/sec
Photo processing 159.5 images/sec 124 images/sec
Ray tracing 26.8 Mpixels/sec 22.8 Mpixels/sec
Sources: GeekBench [1], [2]

PassMark

Synthetic test that focuses on raw computational performance for low-level functions
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
Integer math 86 GOps/sec 100.7 GOps/sec
Floating point math 109.3 GOps/sec 63 GOps/sec
Find prime numbers 330M Primes/sec 123M Primes/sec
Random string sorting 41M Strings/sec 37.8M Strings/sec
Data encryption 26.2 GBytes/sec 17.9 GBytes/sec
Data compression 336.1 MBytes/sec 354.4 MBytes/sec
Physics 2512 Frames/sec 1697 Frames/sec
Extended instructions 26.8B Matrices/sec 25.1B Matrices/sec
Sources: PassMark [3], [4] – 2125 & 83 samples

Blender

3D rendering test that measures CPU performance in 3D modeling tasks (uses all cores)
Blender CPU
289.99

Performance Per Watt

Shows the score you get per each watt of PL1 TDP
Cinebench 2024 / Watt 24.9 PPW 20.2 PPW
Geekbench 6 Multi / Watt 381.6 PPW 249.1 PPW
Passmark CPU Mark / Watt 759.8 PPW 542.9 PPW
Blender / Watt 4.56 PPW 5.37 PPW
These are rough calculations, as most CPUs surpass PL1 TDP wattage even in multicore workloads.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-01-16 (AsNapur)Geekbench 6 CPU2756 / 16837
πŸ“˜ 2026-01-16 (AsNapur)Cinebench 2024122 / 1126
πŸ“˜ 2025-10-31 (Adi)Cinebench 2024114 / 804
πŸ“˜ 2025-09-19 (JacoIsHere)Geekbench 6 CPU2868 / 14847
πŸ“˜ 2025-08-07 (Himmanshu Chowdhury)Cinebench 2024117 / 1122
AMD Ryzen AI 9 465
No benchmark results yet

Specifications

Full technical specification of Intel Core Ultra 9 285H and AMD Ryzen AI 9 465

General

Vendor Intel Amd
Released January 6, 2025 January 5, 2026
Type Laptop Laptop
Instruction Set x86-64 x86-64
Codename Arrow Lake Zen 5 (Gorgon Point)
Model number 285H 465
Integrated GPU Arc Graphics 140T Radeon 880M
Rival Equivalent - AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 -
Intel CPU rating (#46th place)
AMD Ryzen CPU ranking (#40th place)

CPU

Performance Cores
P-Cores 6 4
P-Threads 6 8
Base Frequency (P) 2.9 GHz 2.0 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (P) 5.4 GHz 5 GHz
Efficient Cores
E-Cores 10 6
E-Threads 10 12
Base Frequency (E) 2.7 GHz 2.0 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (E) 4.5 GHz 3.3 GHz
Total
Total Cores 16 10
Total Threads 16 20
Bus Frequency 100 MHz 100 MHz
Multiplier 29x 20x
L1 Cache 112K (per core) 80K (per core)
L2 Cache 2MB (per core) 1MB (per core)
L3 Cache 24MB (shared) 24MB (shared)
Unlocked Multiplier No No

Package

Fabrication Process 3 nm 4 nm
TDP (PL1) 35-45 W (configurable) 15-54 W (configurable)
Max. Boost TDP (PL2) 115 W -
Socket FCBGA-2049 FP8
Peak Temperature 110Β°C 100Β°C
Laptop processors ranking (58th and 65th place)

iGPU

Integrated Graphics Arc Graphics 140T Radeon 880M
GPU Base Clock 300 MHz 400 MHz
GPU Boost Clock 2350 MHz 2900 MHz
Shading Units 1024 768
TMUs 64 48
ROPs 32 16
Execution Units 8 12
TGP 35 W 15 W
iGPU FLOPS
4.8 TFLOPS
4.5 TFLOPS

Memory Support

Memory Types - LPDDR5-8400
- LPDDR5x-8400
- DDR5-6400
- DDR5-5600
- LPDDR5X-8533
Max. Memory Size 128 GB 256 GB
Memory Channels 2 2
Max. Memory Bandwidth - 89.6 GB/s
ECC Support No No

Misc

Official Site Intel Core Ultra 9 285H official page AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 official page
PCI Express Version 5.0 4.0
PCI Express Lanes 28 16

Cast your vote

Choose between two processors
14 (77.8%)
4 (22.2%)
Total votes: 18

Comments

So which CPU will you choose: AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 or Intel Core Ultra 9 285H?
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!