Intel Core Ultra 9 285H vs Apple M4 Pro (12-Core)

We compared two laptop CPUs: the 2.9 GHz Intel Core Ultra 9 285H with 16-cores against the 4.51 GHz Apple M4 Pro (12-Core) with 12-cores. On this page, you'll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.

Review

General overview and comparison of the processors
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Multi-Core Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of power consumption
Integrated Graphics
iGPU capabilities for gaming and 3D-intensive tasks
NanoReview Final Score
Choose your main usage scenario to recalculate the Final Score and see which CPU suits your needs.
πŸ”Œ Usage Scenario:

Key Differences

What are the key differences between (12-Core) and 285H
Advantages of Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
  • Supports up to 128 GB LPDDR5-8400 RAM
  • Has 4 more physical cores
  • More than 10Β° C higher critical temperature
Advantages of Apple M4 Pro (12-Core)
  • More powerful Apple M4 Pro GPU (16-core) integrated graphics: 6.5 vs 4.8 TFLOPS
  • 33% faster in a single-core Geekbench v6 test - 3864 vs 2897 points

Test in Benchmarks

Comparing the performance of CPUs across various tasks

Cinebench

Reputable cross-platform benchmark for high-performance processors
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
Cinebench 2026 (Single) 506 -
Cinebench 2026 (Multi) 4879 5470
Cinebench Scores (123rd and 80th place)

GeekBench v6

The new version of this benchmark emulates common operations often used in real-world apps
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
File compression 1510 MB/sec 2120 MB/sec
Clang compilation 129.7 Klines/sec 165.8 Klines/sec
HTML 5 Browser 425.7 pages/sec 484.7 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 522.7 Mpixels/sec 486.8 Mpixels/sec
Text processing 309.2 pages/sec 368.5 pages/sec
Background blur 73.9 images/sec 84.2 images/sec
Photo processing 159.5 images/sec 189.3 images/sec
Ray tracing 26.8 Mpixels/sec 25.9 Mpixels/sec
Sources: GeekBench [1], [2]

PassMark

Synthetic test that focuses on raw computational performance for low-level functions
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
Integer math 86 GOps/sec 70.9 GOps/sec
Floating point math 109.3 GOps/sec 71.5 GOps/sec
Find prime numbers 330M Primes/sec 460M Primes/sec
Random string sorting 41M Strings/sec 46.4M Strings/sec
Data encryption 26.2 GBytes/sec 19.5 GBytes/sec
Data compression 336.1 MBytes/sec 409.9 MBytes/sec
Physics 2512 Frames/sec 4875 Frames/sec
Extended instructions 26.8B Matrices/sec 21.8B Matrices/sec
Sources: PassMark [3], [4] – 2125 & 661 samples

Blender

3D rendering test that measures CPU performance in 3D modeling tasks (uses all cores)
Blender CPU

Performance Per Watt

Shows the score you get per each watt of PL1 TDP
Cinebench 2024 / Watt 24.9 PPW 37.4 PPW
Geekbench 6 Multi / Watt 381.6 PPW 539.4 PPW
Passmark CPU Mark / Watt 759.8 PPW 860.8 PPW
Blender / Watt 4.56 PPW -
These are rough calculations, as most CPUs surpass PL1 TDP wattage even in multicore workloads.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-01-16 (AsNapur)Geekbench 6 CPU2756 / 16837
πŸ“˜ 2026-01-16 (AsNapur)Cinebench 2024122 / 1126
πŸ“˜ 2025-10-31 (Adi)Cinebench 2024114 / 804
πŸ“˜ 2025-09-19 (JacoIsHere)Geekbench 6 CPU2868 / 14847
πŸ“˜ 2025-08-07 (Himmanshu Chowdhury)Cinebench 2024117 / 1122
Apple M4 Pro (12-Core)
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-03-07 (skibidigomgom)Cinebench 2024172 / 1421
πŸ“˜ 2025-11-21 (TommyYOyoyo)Geekbench 6 CPU4066 / 21270
πŸ“˜ 2025-04-16 (Infrra)Cinebench 2024169 / 1297
πŸ“˜ 2025-02-23 (Amandeep)Geekbench 6 CPU3911 / 20685

Specifications

Full technical specification of Intel Core Ultra 9 285H and Apple M4 Pro (12-Core)

General

Vendor Intel Apple
Released January 6, 2025 October 29, 2024
Type Laptop Laptop
Instruction Set x86-64 ARMv9
Codename Arrow Lake Apple M4
Model number 285H T6040
Integrated GPU Arc Graphics 140T Apple M4 Pro GPU (16-core)
Rival Equivalent - AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 -
Successor - - Apple M5 Pro (15-Core)
Intel CPU rating (#46th place)

CPU

Performance Cores
P-Cores 6 8
P-Threads 6 8
Base Frequency (P) 2.9 GHz 4.51 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (P) 5.4 GHz -
Efficient Cores
E-Cores 10 4
E-Threads 10 4
Base Frequency (E) 2.7 GHz 2.59 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (E) 4.5 GHz -
Total
Total Cores 16 12
Total Threads 16 12
Bus Frequency 100 MHz 100 MHz
Multiplier 29x 45x
L1 Cache 112K (per core) 192K (per core)
L2 Cache 2MB (per core) 32MB (shared)
L3 Cache 24MB (shared) -
Unlocked Multiplier No No

Package

Fabrication Process 3 nm 3 nm
TDP (PL1) 35-45 W (configurable) 38 W
Max. Boost TDP (PL2) 115 W -
Socket FCBGA-2049 Apple M-Socket
Peak Temperature 110Β°C 100Β°C
Laptop processors ranking (58th and 13th place)

iGPU

Integrated Graphics Arc Graphics 140T Apple M4 Pro GPU (16-core)
GPU Base Clock 300 MHz 500 MHz
GPU Boost Clock 2350 MHz 1578 MHz
Shading Units 1024 2048
TMUs 64 128
ROPs 32 64
Execution Units 8 256
TGP 35 W 26 W
iGPU FLOPS
4.8 TFLOPS
6.5 TFLOPS

Memory Support

Memory Types - LPDDR5-8400
- LPDDR5x-8400
- DDR5-6400
- LPDDR5X-8533
Max. Memory Size 128 GB 64 GB
Memory Channels 2 16
Max. Memory Bandwidth - 273 GB/s
ECC Support No No

Misc

Official Site Intel Core Ultra 9 285H official page -
PCI Express Version 5.0 -
PCI Express Lanes 28 -
Further details
Notes on M4 Pro (12-Core):
    - SoC is designed using ARMv9.2-A architecture.

Cast your vote

Choose between two processors
57 (51.4%)
54 (48.6%)
Total votes: 111

Comments

So which CPU will you choose: Apple M4 Pro (12-Core) or Intel Core Ultra 9 285H?
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!