Intel Core Ultra 9 285H vs Apple M5 (10-Core)

We compared two laptop CPUs: the 2.9 GHz Intel Core Ultra 9 285H with 16-cores against the 4.61 GHz Apple M5 (10-Core) with 10-cores. On this page, you'll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.

Review

General overview and comparison of the processors
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Multi-Core Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of power consumption
Integrated Graphics
iGPU capabilities for gaming and 3D-intensive tasks
NanoReview Final Score
Choose your main usage scenario to recalculate the Final Score and see which CPU suits your needs.
πŸ”Œ Usage Scenario:

Key Differences

What are the key differences between (10-Core) and 285H
Advantages of Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
  • Supports up to 128 GB LPDDR5-8400 RAM
  • Has 6 more physical cores
  • More powerful Arc Graphics 140T integrated graphics: 4.8 vs 4.1 TFLOPS
  • More than 10Β° C higher critical temperature
Advantages of Apple M5 (10-Core)
  • Newer - released 10 months later
  • 48% faster in a single-core Geekbench v6 test - 4276 vs 2897 points

Test in Benchmarks

Comparing the performance of CPUs across various tasks

Cinebench

Reputable cross-platform benchmark for high-performance processors
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
Cinebench 2026 (Single) 506 -
Cinebench 2026 (Multi) 4879 4456
Cinebench Scores (123rd and 113th place)

GeekBench v6

The new version of this benchmark emulates common operations often used in real-world apps
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
File compression 1510 MB/sec 1790 MB/sec
Clang compilation 129.7 Klines/sec 138 Klines/sec
HTML 5 Browser 425.7 pages/sec 427.3 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 522.7 Mpixels/sec 430.7 Mpixels/sec
Text processing 309.2 pages/sec 421.1 pages/sec
Background blur 73.9 images/sec 78.7 images/sec
Photo processing 159.5 images/sec 156.2 images/sec
Ray tracing 26.8 Mpixels/sec 21.6 Mpixels/sec
Sources: GeekBench [1], [2]

PassMark

Synthetic test that focuses on raw computational performance for low-level functions
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
34192
26779
Integer math 86 GOps/sec 56.9 GOps/sec
Floating point math 109.3 GOps/sec 75.6 GOps/sec
Find prime numbers 330M Primes/sec 301M Primes/sec
Random string sorting 41M Strings/sec 35.6M Strings/sec
Data encryption 26.2 GBytes/sec 17.1 GBytes/sec
Data compression 336.1 MBytes/sec 296.6 MBytes/sec
Physics 2512 Frames/sec 3199 Frames/sec
Extended instructions 26.8B Matrices/sec 15.1B Matrices/sec
Sources: PassMark [3], [4] – 2125 & 507 samples

Blender

3D rendering test that measures CPU performance in 3D modeling tasks (uses all cores)
Blender CPU
275.89

Performance Per Watt

Shows the score you get per each watt of PL1 TDP
Cinebench 2024 / Watt 24.9 PPW 43.8 PPW
Geekbench 6 Multi / Watt 381.6 PPW 661.6 PPW
Passmark CPU Mark / Watt 759.8 PPW 991.8 PPW
Blender / Watt 4.56 PPW 10.22 PPW
These are rough calculations, as most CPUs surpass PL1 TDP wattage even in multicore workloads.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-01-16 (AsNapur)GeekBench2756 / 16837
πŸ“˜ 2026-01-16 (AsNapur)Cinebench 2024122 / 1126
πŸ“˜ 2025-10-31 (Adi)Cinebench 2024114 / 804
πŸ“˜ 2025-09-19 (JacoIsHere)GeekBench2868 / 14847
πŸ“˜ 2025-08-07 (Himmanshu Chowdhury)Cinebench 2024117 / 1122
Apple M5 (10-Core)
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-29 -> knotp37Cinebench 20260 / 3841
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-05 -> maheshkondrajuGeekBench4224 / 17165
πŸ“˜ 2025-12-27 -> RennsportGeekBench4289 / 18011

Specifications

Full technical specification of Intel Core Ultra 9 285H and Apple M5 (10-Core)

General

Vendor Intel Apple
Released January 6, 2025 October 15, 2025
Type Laptop Laptop
Instruction Set x86-64 ARMv9
Codename Arrow Lake Apple M5
Model number 285H T8142
Integrated GPU Arc Graphics 140T Apple M5 GPU (10-core)
Rival Equivalent - AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 - Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite Extreme (X2E-96-100)
Intel CPU rating (#46th place)

CPU

Performance Cores
P-Cores 6 4
P-Threads 6 4
Base Frequency (P) 2.9 GHz 4.61 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (P) 5.4 GHz -
Efficient Cores
E-Cores 10 6
E-Threads 10 6
Base Frequency (E) 2.7 GHz 3.0 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (E) 4.5 GHz -
Total
Total Cores 16 10
Total Threads 16 10
Bus Frequency 100 MHz 100 MHz
Multiplier 29x 46x
L1 Cache 112K (per core) 192K (per core)
L2 Cache 2MB (per core) 22MB (shared)
L3 Cache 24MB (shared) -
Unlocked Multiplier No No

Package

Transistors - 28 billions
Fabrication Process 3 nm 3 nm
TDP (PL1) 35-45 W (configurable) 27 W
Max. Boost TDP (PL2) 115 W -
Socket FCBGA-2049 Apple M-Socket
Peak Temperature 110Β°C 100Β°C
Die Size - 157.48 mmΒ²
Laptop processors ranking (58th and 21st place)

iGPU

Integrated Graphics Arc Graphics 140T Apple M5 GPU (10-core)
GPU Base Clock 300 MHz -
GPU Boost Clock 2350 MHz 1620 MHz
Shading Units 1024 1280
TMUs 64 80
ROPs 32 40
Execution Units 8 160
TGP 35 W -
iGPU FLOPS
4.8 TFLOPS
4.1 TFLOPS

Memory Support

Memory Types - LPDDR5-8400
- LPDDR5x-8400
- DDR5-6400
- LPDDR5X-9600
Max. Memory Size 128 GB 32 GB
Memory Channels 2 8
Max. Memory Bandwidth - 153.6 GB/s
ECC Support No No

Misc

Official Site Intel Core Ultra 9 285H official page -
PCI Express Version 5.0 -
PCI Express Lanes 28 -

Cast your vote

Choose between two processors
31 (23.7%)
100 (76.3%)
Total votes: 131

Comments

So which CPU will you choose: Apple M5 (10-Core) or Intel Core Ultra 9 285H?
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!