Intel Core Ultra 9 386H vs AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475

We compared two laptop CPUs: the 2.1 GHz Intel Core Ultra 9 386H with 16-cores against the 2.0 GHz AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475 with 12-cores. On this page, you'll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.

Review

General overview and comparison of the processors
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Multi-Core Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of power consumption
Integrated Graphics
iGPU capabilities for gaming and 3D-intensive tasks
NanoReview Final Score
Choose your main usage scenario to recalculate the Final Score and see which CPU suits your needs.
🔌 Usage Scenario:

Key Differences

What are the key differences between 475 and 386H
Advantages of Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
  • More modern manufacturing process – 2 versus 4 nanometers
  • Around 64 GB/s (71%) higher theoretical memory bandwidth
  • Has 4 more physical cores
  • Newer PCI Express version – 5.0
Advantages of AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475
  • More powerful AMD Radeon 890M integrated graphics: 6.3 vs 2.6 TFLOPS
  • Supports up to 256 GB DDR5-5600 RAM
  • Has 6 MB larger L3 cache size, helping fully utilize a high-end GPU in gaming
  • 6% higher Turbo Boost frequency (5.2 GHz vs 4.9 GHz)

Test in Benchmarks

Comparing the performance of CPUs across various tasks

Cinebench

Reputable cross-platform benchmark for high-performance processors
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
Cinebench 2026 (Single) 502 -
Cinebench 2026 (Multi) 4687 4767
Cinebench Scores (104th and 136th place)

GeekBench v6

The new version of this benchmark emulates common operations often used in real-world apps
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
File compression 1420 MB/sec -
Clang compilation 118.2 Klines/sec -
HTML 5 Browser 426.1 pages/sec -
PDF Renderer 483.8 Mpixels/sec -
Text processing 286.3 pages/sec -
Background blur 65.7 images/sec -
Photo processing 157.6 images/sec -
Ray tracing 24.3 Mpixels/sec -
Sources: GeekBench [1], [2]

PassMark

Synthetic test that focuses on raw computational performance for low-level functions
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
Integer math 87.7 GOps/sec 131.9 GOps/sec
Floating point math 109.4 GOps/sec 83.4 GOps/sec
Find prime numbers 347M Primes/sec 139M Primes/sec
Random string sorting 43.6M Strings/sec 52.3M Strings/sec
Data encryption 27.8 GBytes/sec 24.3 GBytes/sec
Data compression 365.2 MBytes/sec 504.1 MBytes/sec
Physics 3086 Frames/sec 2018 Frames/sec
Extended instructions 30.2B Matrices/sec 35.6B Matrices/sec
Sources: PassMark [3], [4] – 156 & 1 samples

Blender

3D rendering test that measures CPU performance in 3D modeling tasks (uses all cores)
Blender CPU

Performance Per Watt

Shows the score you get per each watt of PL1 TDP
Cinebench 2024 / Watt 49.6 PPW 20 PPW
Geekbench 6 Multi / Watt 668.2 PPW 274.7 PPW
Passmark CPU Mark / Watt 1446.8 PPW 715.4 PPW
Blender / Watt 9.76 PPW -
These are rough calculations, as most CPUs surpass PL1 TDP wattage even in multicore workloads.

Specifications

Full technical specification of Intel Core Ultra 9 386H and AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475

General

Vendor Intel Amd
Released January 5, 2026 January 5, 2026
Type Laptop Laptop
Instruction Set x86-64 x86-64
Codename Panther Lake Zen 5 (Gorgon Point)
Model number 386H 475
Integrated GPU Xe3 Graphics Radeon 890M
Rival Equivalent - AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 - Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
Intel CPU rating (#43rd place)
AMD Ryzen CPU ranking (#29th place)

CPU

Performance Cores
P-Cores 4 4
P-Threads 4 8
Base Frequency (P) 2.1 GHz 2.0 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (P) 4.9 GHz 5.2 GHz
Efficient Cores
E-Cores 12 8
E-Threads 12 16
Base Frequency (E) 1.6 GHz 2.0 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (E) 3.7 GHz 3.3 GHz
Total
Total Cores 16 12
Total Threads 16 24
Bus Frequency 100 MHz 100 MHz
Multiplier 20x 20x
L1 Cache 192K (per core) 80K (per core)
L2 Cache 2560K (per core) 1MB (per core)
L3 Cache 18MB (shared) 24MB (shared)
Unlocked Multiplier No No

Package

Fabrication Process 2 nm 4 nm
TDP (PL1) 15-25 W (configurable) 15-54 W (configurable)
Max. Boost TDP (PL2) 80 W -
Socket FCBGA2540 FP8
Peak Temperature 100°C 100°C
Laptop processors ranking (55th and 41st place)

iGPU

Integrated Graphics Intel Xe3 Graphics AMD Radeon 890M
GPU Base Clock 300 MHz 400 MHz
GPU Boost Clock 2500 MHz 3100 MHz
Shading Units 512 1024
TMUs 32 64
ROPs 16 32
Execution Units 4 16
TGP 25 W 15 W
iGPU FLOPS
2.6 TFLOPS
6.3 TFLOPS

Memory Support

Memory Types - LPDDR5X-9600
- DDR5-7200
- DDR5-5600
- LPDDR5X-8533
Max. Memory Size 128 GB 256 GB
Memory Channels 2 2
Max. Memory Bandwidth 153.6 GB/s 89.6 GB/s
ECC Support No No

Misc

Official Site Intel Core Ultra 9 386H official page AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475 official page
PCI Express Version 5.0 4.0
PCI Express Lanes 20 16

Cast your vote

Choose between two processors
17 (54.8%)
14 (45.2%)
Total votes: 31

Comments

So which CPU will you choose: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475 or Intel Core Ultra 9 386H?
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!