Intel Core Ultra X7 358H vs Ultra 7 268V

We compared two laptop CPUs: the 1.9 GHz Intel Core Ultra X7 358H with 16-cores against the 2.2 GHz Ultra 7 268V with 8-cores. On this page, you'll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.

Review

General overview and comparison of the processors
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Multi-Core Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of power consumption
Integrated Graphics
iGPU capabilities for gaming and 3D-intensive tasks
NanoReview Final Score
Choose your main usage scenario to recalculate the Final Score and see which CPU suits your needs.
๐Ÿ”Œ Usage Scenario:

Key Differences

What are the key differences between 268V and 358H
Advantages of Intel Core Ultra X7 358H
  • Newer - released 1 year and 5 months later
  • Supports up to 96 GB LPDDR5X-9600 RAM
  • Has 8 more physical cores
  • More powerful Intel Arc B390 integrated graphics: 7.7 vs 4.1 TFLOPS
  • More modern manufacturing process โ€“ 2 versus 3 nanometers
  • Has 6 MB larger L3 cache size, helping fully utilize a high-end GPU in gaming
Advantages of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V
  • 4% higher Turbo Boost frequency (5 GHz vs 4.8 GHz)

Test in Benchmarks

Comparing the performance of CPUs across various tasks

Cinebench

Reputable cross-platform benchmark for high-performance processors
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
Cinebench 2026 (Single) 502 -
Cinebench 2026 (Multi) 4689 -
Cinebench Scores (#124th place)

GeekBench v6

The new version of this benchmark emulates common operations often used in real-world apps
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
File compression 1210 MB/sec 1030 MB/sec
Clang compilation 98.2 Klines/sec 69 Klines/sec
HTML 5 Browser 371.3 pages/sec 274.2 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 368 Mpixels/sec 289.2 Mpixels/sec
Text processing 293 pages/sec 307.6 pages/sec
Background blur 59.2 images/sec 51.3 images/sec
Photo processing 118.3 images/sec 117.4 images/sec
Ray tracing 19.7 Mpixels/sec 14.4 Mpixels/sec
Sources: GeekBench [1], [2]

PassMark

Synthetic test that focuses on raw computational performance for low-level functions
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
Integer math 82.8 GOps/sec 42.7 GOps/sec
Floating point math 103.3 GOps/sec 57.6 GOps/sec
Find prime numbers 336M Primes/sec 192M Primes/sec
Random string sorting 40.2M Strings/sec 22.4M Strings/sec
Data encryption 25.9 GBytes/sec 13.8 GBytes/sec
Data compression 331.3 MBytes/sec 181.3 MBytes/sec
Physics 3011 Frames/sec 1616 Frames/sec
Extended instructions 27.2B Matrices/sec 15.3B Matrices/sec
Sources: PassMark [3], [4] โ€“ 334 & 1293 samples

Blender

3D rendering test that measures CPU performance in 3D modeling tasks (uses all cores)
Blender CPU

Performance Per Watt

Shows the score you get per each watt of PL1 TDP
Cinebench 2024 / Watt 44.6 PPW 17.2 PPW
Geekbench 6 Multi / Watt 682.5 PPW 302.6 PPW
Passmark CPU Mark / Watt 1346.9 PPW 521.2 PPW
Blender / Watt 11.27 PPW 3.15 PPW
These are rough calculations, as most CPUs surpass PL1 TDP wattage even in multicore workloads.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Intel Core Ultra X7 358H
DateBenchmarkResult
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-09-05 -> asterismxGeekBench2910 / 17150
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-09-05 -> asterismxCinebench 2024126 / 1182
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-09-05 -> asterismxCinebench 20260 / 4753
Intel Core Ultra 7 268V
No benchmark results yet

Specifications

Full technical specification of Intel Core Ultra X7 358H and Ultra 7 268V

General

Vendor Intel Intel
Released January 5, 2026 September 4, 2024
Type Laptop Laptop
Instruction Set x86-64 x86-64
Codename Panther Lake Lunar Lake
Model number 358H 268V
Integrated GPU Arc B390 Arc Graphics 140V
Intel CPU rating (38th and 81st place)

CPU

Performance Cores
P-Cores 4 4
P-Threads 4 4
Base Frequency (P) 1.9 GHz 2.2 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (P) 4.8 GHz 5 GHz
Efficient Cores
E-Cores 12 4
E-Threads 12 4
Base Frequency (E) 1.5 GHz 2.2 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (E) 3.5 GHz 3.7 GHz
Total
Total Cores 16 8
Total Threads 16 8
Bus Frequency 100 MHz 100 MHz
Multiplier 19x 22x
L1 Cache 192K (per core) 192K (per core)
L2 Cache 3MB (per core) 2560K (per core)
L3 Cache 18MB (shared) 12MB (shared)
Unlocked Multiplier No No

Package

Fabrication Process 2 nm 3 nm
TDP (PL1) 15-25 W (configurable) 17-37 W (configurable)
Max. Boost TDP (PL2) 80 W -
Socket FCBGA2540 FCBGA-2833
Peak Temperature 100ยฐC 100ยฐC
Laptop processors ranking (45th and 99th place)

iGPU

Integrated Graphics Intel Arc B390 Intel Arc Graphics 140V
GPU Base Clock 300 MHz 600 MHz
GPU Boost Clock 2500 MHz 2000 MHz
Shading Units 1536 1024
TMUs 48 -
ROPs 24 -
Execution Units 12 -
TGP 30 W 30 W
iGPU FLOPS
7.7 TFLOPS
4.1 TFLOPS

Memory Support

Memory Types - LPDDR5X-9600 - LPDDR5X-8533
Max. Memory Size 96 GB 32 GB
Memory Channels 2 2
Max. Memory Bandwidth 153.6 GB/s -
ECC Support No No

Misc

Official Site Intel Core Ultra X7 358H official page Intel Core Ultra 7 268V official page
PCI Express Version 5.0 5.0
PCI Express Lanes 12 8

Cast your vote

Choose between two processors
10 (71.4%)
4 (28.6%)
Total votes: 14

Comments

So which CPU will you choose: Intel Core Ultra 7 268V or Ultra X7 358H?
๐ŸŒ Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!