Adreno X2-45 vs Adreno X1-85

VS
Adreno X2-45
Adreno X2
Adreno X1-85
Adreno X1

We compared two integrated laptop GPUs: the Adreno X2-45 with 1152 shaders against the 1 year and 11 months older Adreno X1-85 that utilizes 6 pipelines and 1536 shaders. Here you will find complete details about specs, efficiency, performance tests, and more.

Some GPUs come in different configurations. For greater precision, pick a specific config below
TGP / Version -

Review

General comparison of performance in games, applications, power efficiency, and other metrics
Gaming
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan games
Workstation
Perf. in 3D modeling, video editing and rendering apps
Energy Efficiency
Power consumption efficiency in different scenarios
NanoReview Final Score
Overall video card score
Scores marked with a red asterisk (**) represent initial estimates from early testing.

Key differences

Key distinctions and advantages of Adreno X1-85 over Adreno X2-45
Reasons to consider the Adreno X2-45
  • Manufactured using a more efficient 3 nm process technology
Reasons to consider the Adreno X1-85
  • 18% higher maximum theoretical performance (4.6 vs 3.9 TFLOPS)
  • Has 33% more shading units (1536 vs 1152)

Benchmarks

Graphics cards’ performance in recent benchmarking apps

3D Mark

Multiplatform graphics benchmark suite that directly correlates with performance in modern games
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Time Spy - 1695
Solar Bay - 10596
Fire Strike - 6134
Wild Life Extreme - 6152
Night Raid - 28868
Sources: 3DMark [1]

GeekBench 6 GPU Compute

GPU test for computational tasks (image processing, photography, computer vision, and ML)
GB6 Compute Score
Background Blur - 36.4 img/sec
Face Detection - 17.3 img/sec
Horizon Detection - 1.19 Gpixels/sec
Edge Detection - 1.3 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian Blur - 1.42 Gpixels/sec
Feature Matching - 0.3 Gpixels/sec
Stereo Matching - 72.4 Gpixels/sec
Particle Physics - 4692.5 FPS
API - OpenCL
Sources: Geekbench [3]

Passmark Graphics

Videocard test that focuses on compute shaders, multi-texturing, tessellation, and other features
G3D Mark Score
G2D Mark - 518
DirectX 11 - 19 FPS
DirectX 12 - 10 FPS
GPU Compute - 1958 Ops/s
Sources: PassMark [5]7 samples

Artificial Intelligence Tests

Performance in machine learning and artificial intelligence tasks

GeekBench 6 ML

Tests throughput of AI operations in single, half, and quantized precision
GB6 ML Single Precision
GB6 ML Half Precision
GB6 ML Quantized
Image Classification (SP) - 1347
Image Segmentation (HP) - 2661
Image Super Resolution (Q) - 3084
Face Detection (HP) - 5354
Pose Estimation (Q) - 7719
Text Classification (SP) - 292
Machine Translation (HP) - 1108
Object Detection (SP) - 660
Depth Estimation (Q) - 3876
Style Transfer (SP) - 12048
Framework - ONNX
Backend - DirectML
Sources: Geekbench [9]

Specifications

Technical specifications of Adreno X2-45 and Adreno X1-85

General

Vendor Qualcomm Qualcomm
Build Integrated Integrated
Released September 25, 2025 October 24, 2023
Case Laptop Laptop
Purpose Generic Generic
Segment Entry-level Entry-level
Architecture Adreno X2 Adreno X1
GPU Codename Adreno X2 Adreno X1
Rival Equivalent - - Apple M4 GPU (10-Core)
Successor - - Adreno X2-90
Recommended CPU - Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Plus (X2P-64-100) or above - Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus (X1P-64-100) or above
Used in CPUs - Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Plus (X2P-64-100)
- Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Plus (X2P-42-100)
- Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus (X1P-66-100)
- Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite (X1E-78-100)
- Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite (X1E-80-100)
- Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus (X1P-64-100)
- Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite (X1E-84-100)
Laptop GPU ranking (26th and 111th place)

Graphics Processing Unit

Base Clock 500 MHz 300 MHz
Boost Clock 910-1700 MHz (configurable) 1200-1500 MHz (configurable)
Shading Units 1152 1536
Texture Mapping Units (TMUs) 72 96
Render Output Units (ROPs) 36 48
Compute Units (Pipelines) - 6
Tensor Cores No -
Ray-tracing Cores - No
L1 Cache - 192KB per cluster
L2 Cache - 1MB shared
Instructions Per Cycle 2 IPC 2 IPC

Raw Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 33-61 GPixel/s 58-72 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate 66-122 GTexel/s 115-144 GTexel/s
FLOPS (FP32)
2.1-3.9 TFLOPS
3.7-4.6 TFLOPS

Physical

Interface IGP IGP
TGP - 30 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Fabrication Process 3 nm 4 nm
Die Size 220 mm² -

Memory

Memory Type System Shared System Shared
Bus 128-bit -
ECC No -
Memory Bandwidth
152 GB/s

API

DirectX 12.2 12.1
Vulkan 1.4 1.3
OpenGL - 3.2
OpenCL 3.0 3.0
CUDA No No
Ray Tracing Yes Yes
DLSS No No
DisplayPort 1.4 1.4

Cast your vote

Choose between two graphics cards
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total votes: < 1

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!