Apple M5 Pro GPU (16-core) vs Adreno X2-90

We compared two integrated laptop graphics cards: the Apple M5 Pro GPU (16-core) with 256 pipelines and 2048 shaders against the 6 months older Adreno X2-90 that utilizes 12 pipelines and 2048 shaders. Here you will find complete details about specs, efficiency, performance tests, and more.

Review

General comparison of performance in games, applications, power efficiency, and other metrics
Gaming
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan games
Workstation
Perf. in 3D modeling, video editing and rendering apps
Energy Efficiency
Power consumption efficiency in different scenarios
NanoReview Final Score
Overall video card score

Key differences

Key distinctions and advantages of Adreno X2-90 over M5 Pro GPU (16-core)
Reasons to consider the Apple M5 Pro GPU (16-core)
  • Performs significantly better (up to 68%) in 3DMark Steel Nomad Lite
  • Has 35% higher memory bandwidth: 307 vs 228 GB/s
Reasons to consider the Adreno X2-90
  • 15% higher maximum theoretical performance (7.6 vs 6.6 TFLOPS)

Benchmarks

Graphics cards’ performance in recent benchmarking apps

3D Mark

Multiplatform graphics benchmark suite that directly correlates with performance in modern games
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Time Spy - 3644
Solar Bay 39369 24178
Port Royal - 1578
Fire Strike - 10109
Wild Life Extreme 19874 10017
Night Raid - 57060
Sources: 3DMark [1], [2]

GeekBench 6 GPU Compute

GPU test for computational tasks (image processing, photography, computer vision, and ML)
GB6 Compute Score
Background Blur 153.3 img/sec -
Face Detection 101 img/sec -
Horizon Detection 2.82 Gpixels/sec -
Edge Detection 4.09 Gpixels/sec -
Gaussian Blur 3.69 Gpixels/sec -
Feature Matching 0.84 Gpixels/sec -
Stereo Matching 212.6 Gpixels/sec -
Particle Physics 9757.6 FPS -
API OpenCL -
Sources: Geekbench [3]

Passmark Graphics

Videocard test that focuses on compute shaders, multi-texturing, tessellation, and other features
G3D Mark Score
G2D Mark - 604
DirectX 11 - 58 FPS
DirectX 12 - 30 FPS
GPU Compute - 3552 Ops/s
Sources: PassMark [5] – 76 samples

Blender

Rendering performance test for 3D modeling
Blender GPU
Sources: Blender [9] – 51 samples

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Apple M5 Pro GPU (16-core)
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-07-18 (JSK)Steel Nomad Light8894
📘 2026-03-30 (JSK)Geekbench 6 OpenCL76085
Adreno X2-90
No benchmark results yet

Artificial Intelligence Tests

Performance in machine learning and artificial intelligence tasks

GeekBench 6 ML

Tests throughput of AI operations in single, half, and quantized precision
GB6 ML Single Precision
GB6 ML Half Precision
GB6 ML Quantized
Image Classification (SP) 8260 -
Image Segmentation (HP) 25244 -
Image Super Resolution (Q) 33177 -
Face Detection (HP) 51773 -
Pose Estimation (Q) 190718 -
Text Classification (SP) 2913 -
Machine Translation (HP) 8985 -
Object Detection (SP) 7777 -
Depth Estimation (Q) 63837 -
Style Transfer (SP) 128419 -
Framework Core ML -
Backend GPU -
Sources: Geekbench [9], [10]

Specifications

Technical specifications of Apple M5 Pro GPU (16-core) and Adreno X2-90

General

Vendor Apple Qualcomm
Build Integrated Integrated
Released March 3, 2026 September 25, 2025
Case Laptop Laptop
Purpose Professional Generic
Segment Mid-range Mid-range
Architecture Apple M GPU Adreno X2
GPU Codename Custom Adreno X2
Rival Equivalent - - Apple M4 Max GPU (40-core)
Recommended CPU - Apple M5 Pro (15-Core) or above - Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite Extreme (X2E-96-100) or above
Used in CPUs - Apple M5 Pro (15-Core) - Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite (X2E-90-100)
- Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite (X2E-88-100)
- Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite Extreme (X2E-94-100)
- Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite Extreme (X2E-96-100)
Laptop GPU ranking (24th and 36th place)

Graphics Processing Unit

Base Clock - 500 MHz
Boost Clock 1620 MHz 1700-1850 MHz (configurable)
Shading Units 2048 2048
Texture Mapping Units (TMUs) 128 128
Render Output Units (ROPs) 64 64
Compute Units (Pipelines) 256 12
Tensor Cores - No
Instructions Per Cycle 2 IPC 2 IPC

Raw Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 104 GPixel/s 109-118 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate 207 GTexel/s 218-237 GTexel/s
FLOPS (FP32)
7-7.6 TFLOPS

Physical

Interface Custom IGP
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Fabrication Process 3 nm 3 nm
Die Size - 220 mm²
Transistor Count 28 billion -
Max. Temperature 100°C -

Memory

Memory Type System Shared System Shared
Memory Clock 9600 MHz -
Bus 256-bit 192-bit
ECC No No
Memory Bandwidth
307 GB/s
228 GB/s

API

DirectX - 12.2
Vulkan - 1.4
OpenCL - 3.0
CUDA - No
Ray Tracing Yes Yes
DLSS No No
DisplayPort - 1.4

Cast your vote

Choose between two graphics cards
7 (77.8%)
2 (22.2%)
Total votes: 9

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!