Apple M5 Pro GPU (20-core) vs M1 Pro GPU (16-core)

We compared two integrated laptop professional GPUs: the Apple M5 Pro GPU (20-core) with 320 pipelines and 2560 shaders against the 4 years and 5 months older M1 Pro GPU (16-core) that utilizes 256 pipelines and 2048 shaders. Here you will find complete details about specs, efficiency, performance tests, and more.

Review

General comparison of performance in games, applications, power efficiency, and other metrics
Gaming
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan games
Workstation
Perf. in 3D modeling, video editing and rendering apps
AI/ML
Capabilities for machine learning and AI-related tasks
Energy Efficiency
Power consumption efficiency in different scenarios
NanoReview Final Score
Overall video card score

Key differences

Key distinctions and advantages of M1 Pro GPU (16-core) over M5 Pro GPU (20-core)
Reasons to consider the Apple M5 Pro GPU (20-core)
  • Performs significantly better (up to 2.5x) in 3DMark Steel Nomad Lite
  • Manufactured using a more efficient 3 nm process technology
  • 57% higher maximum theoretical performance (8.3 vs 5.3 TFLOPS)
  • Achieves 2.1x more points in the GeekBench 6 Compute test (87K vs 42K)
  • Has 50% higher memory bandwidth: 307 vs 204.8 GB/s
  • Has 25% more shading units (2560 vs 2048)

Benchmarks

Graphics cardsโ€™ performance in recent benchmarking apps

3D Mark

Multiplatform graphics benchmark suite that directly correlates with performance in modern games
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Solar Bay 46865 12485
Wild Life Extreme 23737 9873
Sources: 3DMark [1], [2]

GeekBench 6 OpenCL

GPU test for computational tasks (image processing, photography, computer vision, and ML)
GB6 Compute Score
Background Blur 177.6 img/sec 74.5 img/sec
Face Detection 114.5 img/sec 47.3 img/sec
Horizon Detection 3.19 Gpixels/sec 1.73 Gpixels/sec
Edge Detection 4.45 Gpixels/sec 3.32 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian Blur 4.59 Gpixels/sec 1.75 Gpixels/sec
Feature Matching 0.96 Gpixels/sec 0.47 Gpixels/sec
Stereo Matching 250.4 Gpixels/sec 131.2 Gpixels/sec
Particle Physics 12529.9 FPS 5143 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]

Cinebench 2024 GPU

Hardware benchmark using Maxon's Cinema 4D rendering engine
Cinebench 2024 GPU

Blender

Rendering performance test for 3D modeling
Blender GPU
Sources: Blender [9], [10] โ€“ 94 & 499 samples

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Apple M5 Pro GPU (20-core)
No benchmark results yet
Apple M1 Pro GPU (16-core)
DateBenchmarkResult
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-03-27 (bbffx)Geekbench 6 OpenCL43467
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-03-27 (bbffx)Cinebench 20242423
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-03-27 (bbffx)Steel Nomad Light4048
๐Ÿ“˜ 2025-02-21 (serhii)Geekbench 6 OpenCL40932

Artificial Intelligence Tests

Performance in machine learning and artificial intelligence tasks

GeekBench 6 ML

Tests throughput of AI operations in single, half, and quantized precision
GB6 ML Single Precision
GB6 ML Half Precision
GB6 ML Quantized
Image Classification (SP) 8870 4112
Image Segmentation (HP) 28795 7488
Image Super Resolution (Q) 34820 9882
Face Detection (HP) 55699 14702
Pose Estimation (Q) 212347 33560
Text Classification (SP) 3018 2289
Machine Translation (HP) 9102 1629
Object Detection (SP) 8163 3633
Depth Estimation (Q) 70908 16986
Style Transfer (SP) 152297 53586
Framework Core ML Core ML
Backend GPU GPU
Sources: Geekbench [9], [10]

Specifications

Technical specifications of Apple M5 Pro GPU (20-core) and M1 Pro GPU (16-core)

General

Vendor Apple Apple
Build Integrated Integrated
Released March 3, 2026 October 18, 2021
Case Laptop Laptop
Purpose Professional Professional
Segment Mid-range Mid-range
Architecture Apple M GPU Apple M GPU
GPU Codename Custom -
Rival Equivalent - - GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop
Successor - - Apple M5 Pro GPU (20-core)
Recommended CPU - Apple M5 Pro (18-Core) or above - Apple M1 Pro or above
Used in CPUs - Apple M5 Pro (18-Core) - Apple M1 Pro
Laptop GPU ranking (22nd and 78th place)

Graphics Processing Unit

Base Clock - 450 MHz
Boost Clock 1620 MHz 1296 MHz
Shading Units 2560 2048
Texture Mapping Units (TMUs) 160 128
Render Output Units (ROPs) 80 64
Compute Units (Pipelines) 320 256
Ray-tracing Cores - No
Instructions Per Cycle 2 IPC 2 IPC

Raw Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 130 GPixel/s 83 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate 259 GTexel/s 166 GTexel/s
FLOPS (FP32)
8.3 TFLOPS

Physical

Interface Custom Custom
TGP 28 W 30 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Fabrication Process 3 nm 5 nm
Transistor Count 28 billion 23.2 billion
Max. Temperature 100ยฐC 94ยฐC

Memory

Memory Type System Shared System Shared
Memory Clock 9600 MHz 6400 MHz
Effective Memory Speed - 12800 Mbps
Bus 256-bit 256-bit
ECC No No
Memory Bandwidth
307 GB/s

API

Ray Tracing Yes No
DLSS No No

Cast your vote

Choose between two graphics cards
2 (66.7%)
1 (33.3%)
Total votes: 3

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
๐ŸŒ Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Your Boss May 5, 2026 at 08:00 AM
Pure garbage whoever wrote these numbers is a clown M5 Pro 20core: 10.9Tflops FP32 20.8Tflops FP16 and 41.6 Tflops with Tensor cores.
0 Reply
Serhii May 6, 2026 at 06:08 AM
No error here man. Numbers are correct.
0 Reply