GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop vs Apple M2 Pro GPU (19-core)

We performed a head-to-head comparison of the GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile 6 GB with 30 pipelines and 3840 shaders against the 2 years newer Apple M2 Pro GPU (19-core) that utilizes 304 pipelines and 2432 shaders. Here you will find complete details about specs, efficiency, performance tests, and more.

Some GPUs come in different configurations. For greater precision, pick a specific config below
TGP / Version
-

Review

General comparison of performance in games, applications, power efficiency, and other metrics
Gaming
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan games
Workstation
Perf. in 3D modeling, video editing and rendering apps
AI/ML
Capabilities for machine learning and AI-related tasks
Energy Efficiency
Power consumption efficiency in different scenarios
NanoReview Final Score
Overall video card score

Key differences

Key distinctions and advantages of M2 Pro GPU (19-core) over RTX 3060 Mobile
Reasons to consider the GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop
  • Performs significantly better (up to 59%) in 3DMark Steel Nomad Lite
  • Includes 6 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory
  • 93% higher maximum theoretical performance (13.1 vs 6.8 TFLOPS)
  • Supports Nvidia DLSS 2 technology
  • Achieves 91% more points in the GeekBench 6 Compute test (94K vs 49K)
  • Has 64% higher memory bandwidth: 336 vs 204.8 GB/s
  • Has 58% more shading units (3840 vs 2432)
Reasons to consider the Apple M2 Pro GPU (19-core)
  • Manufactured using a more efficient 5 nm process technology

Gaming Performance

Frame rate comparison across popular AAA titles at different resolutions

Games

FPS Table
Forza Horizon 5
108
64
55
37
-
The Witcher 3
120
95
68
35
-
Counter-Strike 2
173
125
89
44
-
Far Cry 6
88
78
64
34
-
Hogwarts Legacy
62
51
36
18
-
CoD: Modern Warfare III
76
69
49
30
-
Ghost of Tsushima
58
45
33
21
-
Cyberpunk 2077
63
56
35
16
-
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
101
94
66
32
-
Average FPS by Resolution
1080p High 94 -
1080p Ultra 75 -
1440p Ultra 55 -
4K Ultra 30 -
Margin of Error Low High

Benchmarks

Graphics cards’ performance in recent benchmarking apps

3D Mark

Multiplatform graphics benchmark suite that directly correlates with performance in modern games
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Time Spy 8318 -
Solar Bay 36291 16218
Port Royal 4708 -
Fire Strike 20181 -
Wild Life Extreme 16477 12726
Night Raid 72311 -
Sources: 3DMark [1], [2]

GeekBench 6 OpenCL

GPU test for computational tasks (image processing, photography, computer vision, and ML)
GB6 Compute Score
Background Blur 153.5 img/sec 89.7 img/sec
Face Detection 90 img/sec 58 img/sec
Horizon Detection 4.1 Gpixels/sec 1.94 Gpixels/sec
Edge Detection 5.77 Gpixels/sec 3.26 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian Blur 4.35 Gpixels/sec 2.19 Gpixels/sec
Feature Matching 1.01 Gpixels/sec 0.55 Gpixels/sec
Stereo Matching 385.9 Gpixels/sec 163 Gpixels/sec
Particle Physics 12770 FPS 6139.2 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]

Cinebench 2024 GPU

Hardware benchmark using Maxon's Cinema 4D rendering engine
Cinebench 2024 GPU

Passmark Graphics

Videocard test that focuses on compute shaders, multi-texturing, tessellation, and other features
G3D Mark Score
G2D Mark 586 -
DirectX 11 109 FPS -
DirectX 12 58 FPS -
GPU Compute 5621 Ops/s -
Sources: PassMark [5] – 21345 samples

Blender

Rendering performance test for 3D modeling
Blender GPU
2328.43
Sources: Blender [9], [10] – 3143 & 206 samples

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-04-17 (RaRagi-Bliss)Geekbench 6 OpenCL95620
📘 2026-04-17 (RaRagi-Bliss)Geekbench 6 OpenCL95620
Apple M2 Pro GPU (19-core)
No benchmark results yet

Artificial Intelligence Tests

Performance in machine learning and artificial intelligence tasks

GeekBench 6 ML

Tests throughput of AI operations in single, half, and quantized precision
GB6 ML Single Precision
GB6 ML Half Precision
GB6 ML Quantized
Image Classification (SP) 6257 5279
Image Segmentation (HP) 16583 8089
Image Super Resolution (Q) 12510 15007
Face Detection (HP) 29528 19212
Pose Estimation (Q) 51349 44046
Text Classification (SP) 2685 2280
Machine Translation (HP) 3939 1972
Object Detection (SP) 7206 4941
Depth Estimation (Q) 24343 22209
Style Transfer (SP) 113151 79898
Framework ONNX Core ML
Backend DirectML GPU
Sources: Geekbench [9], [10]
Results were compared using different ML frameworks

Specifications

Technical specifications of GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop and Apple M2 Pro GPU (19-core)

General

Vendor Nvidia Apple
Build Discrete Integrated
Released January 12, 2021 January 17, 2023
Case Laptop Laptop
Purpose Gaming Professional
Segment Mid-range High-end
Architecture Ampere Apple M GPU
GPU Codename GA106 (GN20-E3) -
Rival Equivalent - Radeon RX 6600M - GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop
Successor - GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop - Apple M5 Pro GPU (20-core)
Recommended CPU - Intel Core i5 12500H or above - Apple M2 Pro or above
Used in CPUs - - Apple M2 Pro
Laptop GPU ranking (65th and 69th place)

Graphics Processing Unit

Base Clock 816-1387 MHz (configurable) 450 MHz
Boost Clock 1283-1703 MHz (configurable) 1398 MHz
Shading Units 3840 2432
Texture Mapping Units (TMUs) 120 152
Render Output Units (ROPs) 48 76
Compute Units (Pipelines) 30 304
Tensor Cores 120 -
Ray-tracing Cores 30 -
L1 Cache 128KB per cluster -
L2 Cache 3MB shared -
Instructions Per Cycle 2 IPC 2 IPC

Raw Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 62-82 GPixel/s 106 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate 154-204 GTexel/s 212 GTexel/s
FLOPS (FP32)
9.9-13.1 TFLOPS

Physical

Interface PCIe 4.0 x16 Custom
TGP 60-140 W (configurable) 35 W
Manufacturing Samsung TSMC
Fabrication Process 8 nm 5 nm
Die Size 300 mm² -
Transistor Count 13.25 billion 26 billion
Transistor Density 44.17 MTr/mm² -
Max. Temperature - 94°C

Memory

Memory Type GDDR6 System Shared
Memory Size 6 GB -
Memory Clock 1750 MHz 6400 MHz
Effective Memory Speed 12000-14000 Mbps 12800 Mbps
Bus 192-bit 256-bit
ECC No No
Memory Bandwidth
336 GB/s

API

DirectX 12 -
Vulkan 1.2 -
OpenGL 4.6 -
OpenCL 2.0 -
CUDA 8.6 -
Ray Tracing Yes No
DLSS DLSS 2 No
DisplayPort 1.4a -

Cast your vote

Choose between two graphics cards
12 (75%)
4 (25%)
Total votes: 16

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!