GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop vs Apple M4 GPU (10-Core)

We performed a head-to-head comparison of the GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile 6 GB with 20 pipelines and 2560 shaders against the 1 year and 2 months newer Apple M4 GPU (10-Core) that utilizes 160 pipelines and 1280 shaders. Here you will find complete details about specs, efficiency, performance tests, and more.

Some GPUs come in different configurations. For greater precision, pick a specific config below
TGP / Version
-

Review

General comparison of performance in games, applications, power efficiency, and other metrics
Gaming
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan games
Workstation
Perf. in 3D modeling, video editing and rendering apps
AI/ML
Capabilities for machine learning and AI-related tasks
Energy Efficiency
Power consumption efficiency in different scenarios
NanoReview Final Score
Overall video card score

Key differences

Key distinctions and advantages of M4 GPU (10-Core) over RTX 4050 Mobile
Reasons to consider the GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop
  • Performs significantly better (up to 93%) in 3DMark Steel Nomad Lite
  • 3.2x higher maximum theoretical performance (12.1 vs 3.8 TFLOPS)
  • Includes 6 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory
  • Supports Nvidia DLSS 3 technology
  • Achieves 2.2x more points in the GeekBench 6 Compute test (81K vs 37K)
  • Has 60% higher memory bandwidth: 192 vs 120 GB/s
  • Has 2x more shading units (2560 vs 1280)
Reasons to consider the Apple M4 GPU (10-Core)
  • Manufactured using a more efficient 3 nm process technology

Gaming Performance

Frame rate comparison across popular AAA titles at different resolutions

Games

FPS Table
Forza Horizon 5
107
66
56
35
-
The Witcher 3
117
91
67
34
-
Counter-Strike 2
167
126
88
43
-
Far Cry 6
87
79
59
32
-
Hogwarts Legacy
62
52
34
20
-
CoD: Modern Warfare III
75
68
44
30
-
Ghost of Tsushima
57
45
33
17
-
Cyberpunk 2077
61
57
34
13
-
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
98
90
62
32
-
Average FPS by Resolution
1080p High 92 -
1080p Ultra 75 -
1440p Ultra 53 -
4K Ultra 28 -
Margin of Error Low Low

Benchmarks

Graphics cards’ performance in recent benchmarking apps

3D Mark

Multiplatform graphics benchmark suite that directly correlates with performance in modern games
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Time Spy 8212 -
Solar Bay 35375 16554
Port Royal 4624 -
Fire Strike 21909 -
Wild Life Extreme 15492 9610
Night Raid 84848 -
Sources: 3DMark [1], [2]

GeekBench 6 OpenCL

GPU test for computational tasks (image processing, photography, computer vision, and ML)
GB6 Compute Score
81436
Background Blur 141.4 img/sec 72.2 img/sec
Face Detection 84.1 img/sec 48.3 img/sec
Horizon Detection 3.07 Gpixels/sec 1.4 Gpixels/sec
Edge Detection 3.91 Gpixels/sec 1.94 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian Blur 3.85 Gpixels/sec 1.5 Gpixels/sec
Feature Matching 1.1 Gpixels/sec 0.53 Gpixels/sec
Stereo Matching 325.9 Gpixels/sec 123.3 Gpixels/sec
Particle Physics 11008.8 FPS 4938.4 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]

Cinebench 2024 GPU

Hardware benchmark using Maxon's Cinema 4D rendering engine
Cinebench 2024 GPU

Passmark Graphics

Videocard test that focuses on compute shaders, multi-texturing, tessellation, and other features
G3D Mark Score
G2D Mark 622 -
DirectX 11 129 FPS -
DirectX 12 60 FPS -
GPU Compute 5847 Ops/s -
Sources: PassMark [5]14311 samples

Blender

Rendering performance test for 3D modeling
Blender GPU
2568.81
Sources: Blender [9], [10]2080 & 529 samples

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-07-17 (kam)GeekBench93074
📘 2026-07-15 (Mr._.Flexo)Cinebench 20248096
📘 2026-07-02 (SuperDuck)GeekBench90032
📘 2026-05-18 (TheMan)Cinebench 20248523
📘 2026-05-15 -> ZayGeekBench89343
Apple M4 GPU (10-Core)
No benchmark results yet

Artificial Intelligence Tests

Performance in machine learning and artificial intelligence tasks

GeekBench 6 ML

Tests throughput of AI operations in single, half, and quantized precision
GB6 ML Single Precision
GB6 ML Half Precision
27160
GB6 ML Quantized
Image Classification (SP) 6233 4874
Image Segmentation (HP) 16395 8168
Image Super Resolution (Q) 18240 11983
Face Detection (HP) 30758 17036
Pose Estimation (Q) 61300 31171
Text Classification (SP) 3124 2964
Machine Translation (HP) 4357 3410
Object Detection (SP) 7812 5112
Depth Estimation (Q) 29192 22700
Style Transfer (SP) 117759 60872
Framework ONNX Core ML
Backend DirectML GPU
Sources: Geekbench [9], [10]
Results were compared using different ML frameworks

Specifications

Technical specifications of GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop and Apple M4 GPU (10-Core)

General

Vendor Nvidia Apple
Build Discrete Integrated
Released February 22, 2023 May 7, 2024
Case Laptop Laptop
Purpose Gaming Professional
Segment Entry-level Mid-range
Architecture Ada Lovelace Apple M GPU
GPU Codename AD107 (GN21-X2) Custom
Rival Equivalent - Radeon RX 7700S - Adreno X1-85
Successor - GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop - Apple M5 GPU (10-Core)
Recommended CPU - Intel Core Ultra 7 155H or above - Apple M4 (10-Core) or above
Used in CPUs - - Apple M4 (10-Core)
Laptop GPU ranking (65th and 71st place)

Graphics Processing Unit

Base Clock 1140-2070 MHz (configurable) 500 MHz
Boost Clock 1605-2370 MHz (configurable) 1470 MHz
Shading Units 2560 1280
Texture Mapping Units (TMUs) 80 80
Render Output Units (ROPs) 32 40
Compute Units (Pipelines) 20 160
Tensor Cores 80 -
Ray-tracing Cores 20 -
L1 Cache 128KB per cluster -
L2 Cache 12MB shared -
Instructions Per Cycle 2 IPC 2 IPC

Raw Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 51-76 GPixel/s 59 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate 128-190 GTexel/s 118 GTexel/s
FLOPS (FP32)
8.2-12.1 TFLOPS
3.8 TFLOPS

Physical

Interface PCIe 4.0 x16 Custom
TGP 35-140 W (configurable) 18 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Fabrication Process 5 nm 3 nm
Die Size 156 mm² -
Transistor Count 18.9 billion 28 billion
Transistor Density 121.15 MTr/mm² -
Max. Temperature - 100°C

Memory

Memory Type GDDR6 System Shared
Memory Size 6 GB -
Memory Clock 2000 MHz 7500 MHz
Effective Memory Speed 16000 Mbps 15000 Mbps
Bus 96-bit 128-bit
ECC No No
Memory Bandwidth
192 GB/s
120 GB/s

API

DirectX 12 -
Vulkan 1.3 -
OpenGL 4.6 -
OpenCL 3.0 -
CUDA 8.9 -
Ray Tracing Yes Yes
DLSS DLSS 3 No
DisplayPort 1.4a -

Cast your vote

Choose between two graphics cards
113 (66.5%)
57 (33.5%)
Total votes: 170

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!