GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop vs GTX 1660 Ti Mobile

We compared two discrete laptop gaming GPUs: the GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile with 20 pipelines and 2560 shaders against the 3 years and 11 months older GTX 1660 Ti Mobile that utilizes 24 pipelines and 1536 shaders. Here you will find complete details about specs, efficiency, performance tests, and more.

Some GPUs come in different configurations. For greater precision, pick a specific config below
TGP / Version
-

Review

General comparison of performance in games, applications, power efficiency, and other metrics
Gaming
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan games
Workstation
Perf. in 3D modeling, video editing and rendering apps
AI/ML
Capabilities for machine learning and AI-related tasks
Energy Efficiency
Power consumption efficiency in different scenarios
NanoReview Final Score
Overall video card score

Key differences

Key distinctions and advantages of GTX 1660 Ti Laptop over RTX 4050 Mobile
Reasons to consider the GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop
  • Performs significantly better (up to 48%) in 3DMark Steel Nomad Lite
  • 2.5x higher maximum theoretical performance (12.1 vs 4.9 TFLOPS)
  • Manufactured using a more efficient 5 nm process technology
  • Shows 47% higher average frame rate in modern games at QHD resolution – 53 vs 36 FPS
  • Ray-tracing support with 20 dedicated RT cores
Reasons to consider the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  • Has 50% higher memory bandwidth: 288 vs 192 GB/s

Gaming Performance

Frame rate comparison across popular AAA titles at different resolutions

Games

FPS Table
Forza Horizon 5
107
66
56
35
80
47
38
22
The Witcher 3
117
91
67
34
76
62
42
23
Counter-Strike 2
167
126
88
43
122
87
62
27
Far Cry 6
87
79
59
32
66
60
44
23
Hogwarts Legacy
62
52
34
20
43
32
23
14
CoD: Modern Warfare III
75
68
44
30
49
44
29
17
Ghost of Tsushima
57
45
33
17
37
29
22
12
Cyberpunk 2077
61
57
34
13
43
37
23
9
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
98
90
62
32
71
65
42
20
Average FPS by Resolution
1080p High 92 65
1080p Ultra 75 51
1440p Ultra 53 36
4K Ultra 28 19
Margin of Error Low Low

Benchmarks

Graphics cards’ performance in recent benchmarking apps

3D Mark

Multiplatform graphics benchmark suite that directly correlates with performance in modern games
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Time Spy 8212 5596
Solar Bay 35375 18008
Port Royal 4624 1507
Fire Strike 21909 14839
Wild Life Extreme 15492 11434
Night Raid 84848 60345
Sources: 3DMark [1], [2]

GeekBench 6 OpenCL

GPU test for computational tasks (image processing, photography, computer vision, and ML)
GB6 Compute Score
Background Blur 141.4 img/sec 119.1 img/sec
Face Detection 84.1 img/sec 64.8 img/sec
Horizon Detection 3.07 Gpixels/sec 2.58 Gpixels/sec
Edge Detection 3.91 Gpixels/sec 3.28 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian Blur 3.85 Gpixels/sec 3.37 Gpixels/sec
Feature Matching 1.1 Gpixels/sec 0.88 Gpixels/sec
Stereo Matching 325.9 Gpixels/sec 300.1 Gpixels/sec
Particle Physics 11008.8 FPS 8599.6 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]

Cinebench 2024 GPU

Hardware benchmark using Maxon's Cinema 4D rendering engine
Cinebench 2024 GPU

Passmark Graphics

Videocard test that focuses on compute shaders, multi-texturing, tessellation, and other features
G3D Mark Score
G2D Mark 622 473
DirectX 11 129 FPS 87 FPS
DirectX 12 60 FPS 39 FPS
GPU Compute 5847 Ops/s 3652 Ops/s
Sources: PassMark [5], [6] – 14311 & 5628 samples

Blender

Rendering performance test for 3D modeling
Blender GPU
2567.25
Sources: Blender [9], [10] – 2120 & 70 samples

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-07-17 (kam)Geekbench 6 OpenCL93074
📘 2026-07-15 (Mr._.Flexo)Cinebench 20248096
📘 2026-07-02 (SuperDuck)Geekbench 6 OpenCL90032
📘 2026-05-18 (TheMan)Cinebench 20248523
📘 2026-05-15 -> ZayGeekbench 6 OpenCL89343
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
No benchmark results yet

Artificial Intelligence Tests

Performance in machine learning and artificial intelligence tasks

GeekBench 6 ML

Tests throughput of AI operations in single, half, and quantized precision
GB6 ML Single Precision
GB6 ML Half Precision
GB6 ML Quantized
Image Classification (SP) 6233 3378
Image Segmentation (HP) 16395 4732
Image Super Resolution (Q) 18240 8716
Face Detection (HP) 30758 7909
Pose Estimation (Q) 61300 35887
Text Classification (SP) 3124 1591
Machine Translation (HP) 4357 1912
Object Detection (SP) 7812 4195
Depth Estimation (Q) 29192 15599
Style Transfer (SP) 117759 70176
Framework ONNX ONNX
Backend DirectML DirectML
Sources: Geekbench [9], [10]

Specifications

Technical specifications of GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop and GTX 1660 Ti Mobile

General

Vendor Nvidia Nvidia
Build Discrete Discrete
Released February 22, 2023 April 23, 2019
Case Laptop Laptop
Purpose Gaming Gaming
Segment Entry-level Mid-range
Architecture Ada Lovelace Turing
GPU Codename AD107 (GN21-X2) TU116 (N18E-G0)
Rival Equivalent - Radeon RX 7700S -
Successor - GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop -
Recommended CPU - Intel Core Ultra 7 155H or above - Intel Core i5 10300H or above
Laptop GPU ranking (67th and 91st place)

Graphics Processing Unit

Base Clock 1140-2070 MHz (configurable) 1455 MHz
Boost Clock 1605-2370 MHz (configurable) 1590 MHz
Shading Units 2560 1536
Texture Mapping Units (TMUs) 80 96
Render Output Units (ROPs) 32 48
Compute Units (Pipelines) 20 24
Tensor Cores 80 No
Ray-tracing Cores 20 No
L1 Cache 128KB per cluster 64KB per cluster
L2 Cache 12MB shared 1536KB shared
Instructions Per Cycle 2 IPC 2 IPC

Raw Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 51-76 GPixel/s 76 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate 128-190 GTexel/s 153 GTexel/s
FLOPS (FP32)
8.2-12.1 TFLOPS
4.9 TFLOPS

Physical

Interface PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
TGP 35-140 W (configurable) 80 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Fabrication Process 5 nm 12 nm
Die Size 156 mm² 284 mm²
Transistor Count 18.9 billion 6.6 billion
Transistor Density 121.15 MTr/mm² 23.24 MTr/mm²

Memory

Memory Type GDDR6 GDDR6
Memory Size 6 GB 6 GB
Memory Clock 2000 MHz 1500 MHz
Effective Memory Speed 16000 Mbps 12000 Mbps
Bus 96-bit 192-bit
ECC No No
Memory Bandwidth
192 GB/s
288 GB/s

API

DirectX 12 12
Vulkan 1.3 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
OpenCL 3.0 1.2
CUDA 8.9 7.5
Ray Tracing Yes No
DLSS DLSS 3 No
DisplayPort 1.4a 1.4

Cast your vote

Choose between two graphics cards
22 (78.6%)
6 (21.4%)
Total votes: 28

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!