Intel Arc 140V vs Arc 130T

VS
Intel Arc 140V
Lunar Lake iGPU
Intel Arc 130T
Arrow Lake iGPU

We compared two integrated laptop GPUs: the Intel Arc 140V with 1024 shaders against the 4 months newer Arc 130T that utilizes 7 pipelines and 896 shaders. Here you will find complete details about specs, efficiency, performance tests, and more.

Review

General comparison of performance in games, applications, power efficiency, and other metrics
Gaming
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan games
Workstation
Perf. in 3D modeling, video editing and rendering apps
Energy Efficiency
Power consumption efficiency in different scenarios
NanoReview Final Score
Overall video card score

Key differences

Key distinctions and advantages of Arc 130T over Arc 140V
Reasons to consider the Intel Arc 140V
  • Manufactured using a more efficient 3 nm process technology
Reasons to consider the Intel Arc 130T
  • Achieves 21% more points in the GeekBench 6 Compute test (36K vs 30K)
  • Features 112 tensor cores for effective deep learning and AI workloads

Gaming Performance

Frame rate comparison across popular AAA titles at different resolutions

Games

FPS Table
Forza Horizon 5 -
46
26
21
10
The Witcher 3 -
37
29
22
10
Counter-Strike 2 -
40
28
22
-
Far Cry 6 -
34
28
23
11
Hogwarts Legacy -
19
11
-
-
CoD: Modern Warfare III -
29
27
20
11
Ghost of Tsushima -
22
14
11
-
Cyberpunk 2077 -
21
16
11
-
Shadow of the Tomb Raider -
34
32
20
13
Average FPS by Resolution
1080p High - 31
1080p Ultra - 23
1440p Ultra - 18
4K Ultra - 9
Margin of Error High Low

Benchmarks

Graphics cards’ performance in recent benchmarking apps

3D Mark

Multiplatform graphics benchmark suite that directly correlates with performance in modern games
Steel Nomad Lite Score
n/a
2904
Time Spy 3715 3409
Solar Bay - 12704
Port Royal - 1902
Fire Strike - 8001
Wild Life Extreme - 5990
Night Raid - 36940
Sources: 3DMark [1]

GeekBench 6 OpenCL

GPU test for computational tasks (image processing, photography, computer vision, and ML)
GB6 Compute Score
30059
Arc 130T +21%
36282
Background Blur 73.6 img/sec 70.9 img/sec
Face Detection 39 img/sec 34.9 img/sec
Horizon Detection 0.79 Gpixels/sec 1.13 Gpixels/sec
Edge Detection 1.11 Gpixels/sec 1.42 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian Blur 1.6 Gpixels/sec 1.96 Gpixels/sec
Feature Matching 0.38 Gpixels/sec 0.45 Gpixels/sec
Stereo Matching 107.1 Gpixels/sec 131.5 Gpixels/sec
Particle Physics 4521.5 FPS 7360.9 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]

Passmark Graphics

Videocard test that focuses on compute shaders, multi-texturing, tessellation, and other features
G3D Mark Score
5142
Arc 130T +19%
6114
G2D Mark 657 791
DirectX 11 38 FPS 42 FPS
DirectX 12 28 FPS 27 FPS
GPU Compute 2750 Ops/s 2620 Ops/s
Sources: PassMark [5], [6] – 4653 & 360 samples

Blender

Rendering performance test for 3D modeling
Blender GPU
562.02
Arc 130T +7%
604.09
Sources: Blender [9], [10] – 90 & 10 samples

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Intel Arc 140V
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-04-15 -> maheshkondrajuGeekbench 6 OpenCL31387
Intel Arc 130T
No benchmark results yet

Artificial Intelligence Tests

Performance in machine learning and artificial intelligence tasks

GeekBench 6 ML

Tests throughput of AI operations in single, half, and quantized precision
GB6 ML Single Precision
n/a
7262
GB6 ML Half Precision
n/a
9964
GB6 ML Quantized
n/a
5008
Image Classification (SP) - 3978
Image Segmentation (HP) - 8374
Image Super Resolution (Q) - 5792
Face Detection (HP) - 13023
Pose Estimation (Q) - 16149
Text Classification (SP) - 1356
Machine Translation (HP) - 2594
Object Detection (SP) - 4754
Depth Estimation (Q) - 12040
Style Transfer (SP) - 51653
Framework - ONNX
Backend - DirectML
Sources: Geekbench [9], [10]

Specifications

Technical specifications of Intel Arc 140V and Arc 130T

General

Vendor Intel Intel
Build Integrated Integrated
Released September 4, 2024 January 6, 2025
Case Laptop Laptop
Purpose Generic Generic
Segment Mid-range Entry-level
Architecture Xe2 Xe+
GPU Codename Lunar Lake iGPU Arrow Lake iGPU
Rival Equivalent - - Radeon 840M
Recommended CPU - Intel Core Ultra 7 256V or above - Intel Core Ultra 5 225H or above
Used in CPUs - Intel Core Ultra 9 288V
- Intel Core Ultra 7 268V
- Intel Core Ultra 7 266V
- Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
- Intel Core Ultra 7 256V
- Intel Core Ultra 5 225H
Laptop GPU ranking (72nd and 100th place)

Graphics Processing Unit

Base Clock 600 MHz 300 MHz
Boost Clock 1950-2050 MHz (configurable) 2200 MHz
Shading Units 1024 896
Texture Mapping Units (TMUs) - 56
Render Output Units (ROPs) - 28
Compute Units (Pipelines) - 7
Tensor Cores No 112
Ray-tracing Cores 8 7
L2 Cache - 4MB shared
Instructions Per Cycle 2 IPC 2 IPC

Raw Performance

Pixel Fill Rate - 62 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate - 123 GTexel/s
FLOPS (FP32)
Arc 140V +8%
4-4.2 TFLOPS
3.9 TFLOPS

Physical

Interface Ring Bus PCIe 4.0 x8
TGP 30 W 35 W
Manufacturing Intel TSMC
Fabrication Process 3 nm 5 nm
Max. Temperature 100°C 110°C

Memory

Memory Type System Shared System Shared
ECC No -

API

DirectX 12.2 12.2
Vulkan - 1.3
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
OpenCL 3.0 3.0
CUDA No No
Ray Tracing Yes Yes
DLSS No No
DisplayPort 2.1 2.1

Cast your vote

Choose between two graphics cards
2 (10.5%)
17 (89.5%)
Total votes: 19

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
human9889745764 September 26, 2026 at 07:05 PM
arc 130 better and cost effective :/
0 Reply