Intel Arc 140T vs Arc 130T

VS
Intel Arc 140T
Arrow Lake iGPU
Intel Arc 130T
Arrow Lake iGPU

We compared two integrated laptop GPUs: the Intel Arc 140T with 8 pipelines and 1024 shaders against the Arc 130T that utilizes 7 pipelines and 896 shaders. Here you will find complete details about specs, efficiency, performance tests, and more.

Review

General comparison of performance in games, applications, power efficiency, and other metrics
Gaming
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan games
Workstation
Perf. in 3D modeling, video editing and rendering apps
AI/ML
Capabilities for machine learning and AI-related tasks
Energy Efficiency
Power consumption efficiency in different scenarios
NanoReview Final Score
Overall video card score

Key differences

Key distinctions and advantages of Arc 130T over Arc 140T
Reasons to consider the Intel Arc 140T
  • 23% higher maximum theoretical performance (4.8 vs 3.9 TFLOPS)

Gaming Performance

Frame rate comparison across popular AAA titles at different resolutions

Games

FPS Table
Forza Horizon 5
53
28
21
12
46
26
21
10
The Witcher 3
42
33
23
12
37
29
22
10
Counter-Strike 2
48
33
22
10
40
28
22
-
Far Cry 6
37
35
24
11
34
28
23
11
Hogwarts Legacy
19
14
-
-
19
11
-
-
CoD: Modern Warfare III
31
29
21
11
29
27
20
11
Ghost of Tsushima
21
18
13
-
22
14
11
-
Cyberpunk 2077
23
19
11
-
21
16
11
-
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
38
36
22
12
34
32
20
13
Average FPS by Resolution
1080p High 35 31
1080p Ultra 27 23
1440p Ultra 18 18
4K Ultra 10 9
Margin of Error Low Low

Benchmarks

Graphics cards’ performance in recent benchmarking apps

3D Mark

Multiplatform graphics benchmark suite that directly correlates with performance in modern games
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Arc 140T +10%
3199
2904
Time Spy 3769 3409
Solar Bay 14421 12704
Port Royal 1966 1902
Fire Strike 8568 8001
Wild Life Extreme 6618 5990
Night Raid 38478 36940
Sources: 3DMark [1], [2]

GeekBench 6 OpenCL

GPU test for computational tasks (image processing, photography, computer vision, and ML)
GB6 Compute Score
Arc 140T +17%
42502
36282
Background Blur 90 img/sec 70.9 img/sec
Face Detection 39.5 img/sec 34.9 img/sec
Horizon Detection 1.21 Gpixels/sec 1.13 Gpixels/sec
Edge Detection 1.52 Gpixels/sec 1.42 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian Blur 2.41 Gpixels/sec 1.96 Gpixels/sec
Feature Matching 0.51 Gpixels/sec 0.45 Gpixels/sec
Stereo Matching 161.8 Gpixels/sec 131.5 Gpixels/sec
Particle Physics 9155.9 FPS 7360.9 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]

Passmark Graphics

Videocard test that focuses on compute shaders, multi-texturing, tessellation, and other features
G3D Mark Score
Arc 140T +8%
6597
6114
G2D Mark 833 791
DirectX 11 47 FPS 42 FPS
DirectX 12 30 FPS 27 FPS
GPU Compute 2892 Ops/s 2620 Ops/s
Sources: PassMark [5], [6] – 2205 & 360 samples

Blender

Rendering performance test for 3D modeling
Blender GPU
Arc 140T +27%
765.53
604.09
Sources: Blender [9], [10] – 41 & 10 samples

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Intel Arc 140T
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-04-16 -> Lello75Geekbench 6 OpenCL42034
📘 2025-09-19 (JacoIsHere)Geekbench 6 OpenCL42182
Intel Arc 130T
No benchmark results yet

Artificial Intelligence Tests

Performance in machine learning and artificial intelligence tasks

GeekBench 6 ML

Tests throughput of AI operations in single, half, and quantized precision
GB6 ML Single Precision
Arc 140T +21%
8764
7262
GB6 ML Half Precision
Arc 140T +21%
12046
9964
GB6 ML Quantized
Arc 140T +16%
5815
5008
Image Classification (SP) 5224 3978
Image Segmentation (HP) 10501 8374
Image Super Resolution (Q) 6436 5792
Face Detection (HP) 15277 13023
Pose Estimation (Q) 19008 16149
Text Classification (SP) 1566 1356
Machine Translation (HP) 2969 2594
Object Detection (SP) 6172 4754
Depth Estimation (Q) 14526 12040
Style Transfer (SP) 62049 51653
Framework ONNX ONNX
Backend DirectML DirectML
Sources: Geekbench [9], [10]

Specifications

Technical specifications of Intel Arc 140T and Arc 130T

General

Vendor Intel Intel
Build Integrated Integrated
Released January 6, 2025 January 6, 2025
Case Laptop Laptop
Purpose Generic Generic
Segment Entry-level Entry-level
Architecture Xe+ Xe+
GPU Codename Arrow Lake iGPU Arrow Lake iGPU
Rival Equivalent - Radeon 860M - Radeon 840M
Recommended CPU - Intel Core Ultra 5 235H or above - Intel Core Ultra 5 225H or above
Used in CPUs - Intel Core Ultra 5 235H
- Intel Core Ultra 7 255H
- Intel Core Ultra 7 265H
- Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
- Intel Core Ultra 5 225H
Laptop GPU ranking (95th and 100th place)

Graphics Processing Unit

Base Clock 300 MHz 300 MHz
Boost Clock 2250-2350 MHz (configurable) 2200 MHz
Shading Units 1024 896
Texture Mapping Units (TMUs) 64 56
Render Output Units (ROPs) 32 28
Compute Units (Pipelines) 8 7
Tensor Cores 128 112
Ray-tracing Cores 8 7
L2 Cache 4MB shared 4MB shared
Instructions Per Cycle 2 IPC 2 IPC

Raw Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 72-75 GPixel/s 62 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate 144-150 GTexel/s 123 GTexel/s
FLOPS (FP32)
Arc 140T +23%
4.6-4.8 TFLOPS
3.9 TFLOPS

Physical

Interface PCIe 4.0 x8 PCIe 4.0 x8
TGP 35 W 35 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Fabrication Process 5 nm 5 nm
Max. Temperature 110°C 110°C

Memory

Memory Type System Shared System Shared

API

DirectX 12.2 12.2
Vulkan 1.3 1.3
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
OpenCL 3.0 3.0
CUDA No No
Ray Tracing Yes Yes
DLSS No No
DisplayPort 2.1 2.1

Cast your vote

Choose between two graphics cards
45 (45.5%)
54 (54.5%)
Total votes: 99

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Shreshth October 17, 2025 at 09:09 PM
Why people like arc 130t more when compare with 140t??
+33 Reply
Avatar
ShuBh November 3, 2025 at 07:25 PM
Also have same question
+4 Reply
Avatar
Pegion November 16, 2025 at 06:00 AM
Maybe cost-effectiveness - just a guess
+14 Reply
Avatar
human9889745764 September 26, 2026 at 07:03 PM
becas of cost effective, if u see pcurrent prices, u will see that freaky huge diff on cost diff of 130t laptops and 140t laptops
0 Reply