AMD Radeon 890M vs Intel Arc 140V

VS
AMD Radeon 890M
Strix Point
Intel Arc 140V
Lunar Lake iGPU

We compared two integrated laptop GPUs: the Radeon 890M with 16 pipelines and 1024 shaders against the 3 months newer Intel Arc 140V that utilizes 1024 shaders. Here you will find complete details about specs, efficiency, performance tests, and more.

Review

General comparison of performance in games, applications, power efficiency, and other metrics
Gaming
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan games
Workstation
Perf. in 3D modeling, video editing and rendering apps
Energy Efficiency
Power consumption efficiency in different scenarios
NanoReview Final Score
Overall video card score

Key differences

Key distinctions and advantages of Arc 140V over Radeon 890M
Reasons to consider the Radeon 890M
  • 40% higher maximum theoretical performance (5.9 vs 4.2 TFLOPS)
  • Achieves 43% more points in the GeekBench 6 Compute test (42K vs 30K)
Reasons to consider the Intel Arc 140V
  • Manufactured using a more efficient 3 nm process technology

Gaming Performance

Frame rate comparison across popular AAA titles at different resolutions

Games

FPS Table
Forza Horizon 5
57
30
25
14
-
The Witcher 3
36
32
18
-
-
Counter-Strike 2
51
34
25
10
-
Far Cry 6
43
37
23
13
-
Hogwarts Legacy
25
17
14
-
-
CoD: Modern Warfare III
39
34
22
14
-
Ghost of Tsushima
25
17
12
-
-
Cyberpunk 2077
23
23
12
-
-
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
43
34
21
10
-
Average FPS by Resolution
1080p High 38 -
1080p Ultra 29 -
1440p Ultra 19 -
4K Ultra 10 -
Margin of Error Low High

Benchmarks

Graphics cards’ performance in recent benchmarking apps

3D Mark

Multiplatform graphics benchmark suite that directly correlates with performance in modern games
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Time Spy 3305 3715
Solar Bay 15412 -
Port Royal 1795 -
Fire Strike 8908 -
Wild Life Extreme 6884 -
Night Raid 37640 -
Sources: 3DMark [1]

GeekBench 6 OpenCL

GPU test for computational tasks (image processing, photography, computer vision, and ML)
GB6 Compute Score
42932
30059
Background Blur 98.6 img/sec 73.6 img/sec
Face Detection 42 img/sec 39 img/sec
Horizon Detection 1.25 Gpixels/sec 0.79 Gpixels/sec
Edge Detection 1.6 Gpixels/sec 1.11 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian Blur 1.69 Gpixels/sec 1.6 Gpixels/sec
Feature Matching 0.55 Gpixels/sec 0.38 Gpixels/sec
Stereo Matching 214.8 Gpixels/sec 107.1 Gpixels/sec
Particle Physics 7757.7 FPS 4521.5 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]

Passmark Graphics

Videocard test that focuses on compute shaders, multi-texturing, tessellation, and other features
G3D Mark Score
8083
5142
G2D Mark 979 657
DirectX 11 73 FPS 38 FPS
DirectX 12 37 FPS 28 FPS
GPU Compute 4162 Ops/s 2750 Ops/s
Sources: PassMark [5], [6] – 2175 & 4653 samples

Blender

Rendering performance test for 3D modeling
Blender GPU
302.04
Arc 140V +86%
562.02
Sources: Blender [9], [10] – 94 & 90 samples

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Radeon 890M
No benchmark results yet
Intel Arc 140V
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-04-15 -> maheshkondrajuGeekbench 6 OpenCL31387

Artificial Intelligence Tests

Performance in machine learning and artificial intelligence tasks

GeekBench 6 ML

Tests throughput of AI operations in single, half, and quantized precision
GB6 ML Single Precision
GB6 ML Half Precision
15157
n/a
GB6 ML Quantized
Image Classification (SP) 3563 -
Image Segmentation (HP) 6170 -
Image Super Resolution (Q) 10762 -
Face Detection (HP) 13773 -
Pose Estimation (Q) 37861 -
Text Classification (SP) 2572 -
Machine Translation (HP) 4699 -
Object Detection (SP) 2845 -
Depth Estimation (Q) 17260 -
Style Transfer (SP) 86751 -
Framework ONNX -
Backend DirectML -
Sources: Geekbench [9], [10]

Specifications

Technical specifications of Radeon 890M and Intel Arc 140V

General

Vendor Amd Intel
Build Integrated Integrated
Released June 3, 2024 September 4, 2024
Case Laptop Laptop
Purpose Generic Generic
Segment Mid-range Mid-range
Architecture RDNA 3.5 Xe2
GPU Codename Strix Point Lunar Lake iGPU
Rival Equivalent - Intel Arc 140V -
Successor - Radeon 8060S -
Recommended CPU - AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 or above - Intel Core Ultra 7 256V or above
Used in CPUs - AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470
- AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475
- AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme
- AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
- AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
- Intel Core Ultra 9 288V
- Intel Core Ultra 7 268V
- Intel Core Ultra 7 266V
- Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
- Intel Core Ultra 7 256V
Laptop GPU ranking (80th and 72nd place)

Graphics Processing Unit

Base Clock 400 MHz 600 MHz
Boost Clock 2900 MHz 1950-2050 MHz (configurable)
Shading Units 1024 1024
Texture Mapping Units (TMUs) 64 -
Render Output Units (ROPs) 32 -
Compute Units (Pipelines) 16 -
Tensor Cores No No
Ray-tracing Cores 16 8
L1 Cache 128KB per cluster -
L2 Cache 2MB shared -
Instructions Per Cycle 2 IPC 2 IPC

Raw Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 93 GPixel/s -
Texture Fill Rate 186 GTexel/s -
FLOPS (FP32)
5.9 TFLOPS
4-4.2 TFLOPS

Physical

Interface PCIe 4.0 x8 Ring Bus
TGP 15 W 30 W
Manufacturing TSMC Intel
Fabrication Process 4 nm 3 nm
Die Size 233 mm² -
Transistor Count 34 billion -
Transistor Density 145.92 MTr/mm² -
Max. Temperature 100°C 100°C

Memory

Memory Type System Shared System Shared
ECC No No

API

DirectX 12 12.2
Vulkan 1.4 -
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
OpenCL 2.1 3.0
CUDA None No
Ray Tracing Yes Yes
DLSS No No
DisplayPort 2.1 2.1

Cast your vote

Choose between two graphics cards
145 (61.7%)
90 (38.3%)
Total votes: 235

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Randlemahn August 25, 2025 at 09:40 AM
Intel redemption arc? Pun intended.
+3 Reply
Avatar
guy August 1, 2025 at 07:10 AM
Intel has improved alot. Now intel iGpus can beat amd's iGpus.
+1 Reply
Avatar
Unknown December 1, 2024 at 11:19 AM
I find it rather funny that although on paper the 890m has better specs and it really does while in real world gaming perfomance the 140v takes the lead in most of the titles while consuming 5-6 watts less and in a few titles it consumes 1-2 watts less and no I will not ask you to take my word for it. Here's the link to KitGuru's comparison between the two. https://youtu.be/eg74aUQGdSg?si=09HWpgbRS8hnm63P (PS: If the link isn't working by clicking on it, copy and paste it).
+38 Reply