Intel Arc A770 vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB

We compared two discrete desktop gaming GPUs: the Intel Arc A770 with 4096 shaders against the 9 months newer GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB that utilizes 34 pipelines and 4352 shaders. Here you will find complete details about specs, efficiency, performance tests, and more.

Review

General comparison of performance in games, applications, power efficiency, and other metrics
Gaming
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan games
Workstation
Perf. in 3D modeling, video editing and rendering apps
AI/ML
Capabilities for machine learning and AI-related tasks
Energy Efficiency
Power consumption efficiency in different scenarios
NanoReview Final Score
Overall video card score
Scores marked with a red asterisk (**) represent initial estimates from early testing.

Value for money (Beta)

We use average GPU prices from all manufacturers by default. Enter the current price of a specific card for better accuracy.
Currency
16 GB GDDR6
VS
16 GB GDDR6
67.4
(Good)
Value Index
30.4
(Mediocre)

Key differences

Key distinctions and advantages of RTX 4060 Ti 16GB over Arc A770
Reasons to consider the Intel Arc A770
  • Features 376 more tensor cores for effective ML and AI workloads
  • Has 78% higher memory bandwidth: 512 vs 288 GB/s
Reasons to consider the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
  • Shows 30% higher average frame rate in modern games at QHD resolution – 86 vs 66 FPS
  • Manufactured using a more efficient 5 nm process technology
  • Supports Nvidia DLSS 3 technology

Gaming Performance

Frame rate comparison across popular AAA titles at different resolutions

Games

FPS Table
Forza Horizon 5
119
77
64
50
144
94
83
62
The Witcher 3
147
126
91
46
172
141
99
53
Counter-Strike 2
162
114
82
42
245
190
132
76
Far Cry 6
108
98
75
41
129
117
92
56
Hogwarts Legacy
69
57
45
22
95
81
62
32
CoD: Modern Warfare III
80
81
58
37
118
112
81
52
Ghost of Tsushima
69
58
45
25
88
75
57
31
Cyberpunk 2077
86
77
53
24
105
92
56
26
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
118
105
81
43
161
147
111
59
Average FPS by Resolution
1080p High 106 140
1080p Ultra 88 117
1440p Ultra 66 86
4K Ultra 37 50
Margin of Error Low Low

Benchmarks

Graphics cards’ performance in recent benchmarking apps

3D Mark

Multiplatform graphics benchmark suite that directly correlates with performance in modern games
Steel Nomad Lite Score
12635
13566
Time Spy 13554 13456
Solar Bay 51133 62446
Port Royal 7236 8119
Fire Strike 34120 34258
Wild Life Extreme 26276 25587
Night Raid 122449 135657
Sources: 3DMark [1], [2]

GeekBench 6 OpenCL

GPU test for computational tasks (image processing, photography, computer vision, and ML)
GB6 Compute Score
113935
135837
Background Blur 175 img/sec 232.6 img/sec
Face Detection 98 img/sec 138.4 img/sec
Horizon Detection 3.63 Gpixels/sec 4.68 Gpixels/sec
Edge Detection 5.51 Gpixels/sec 6.06 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian Blur 8.51 Gpixels/sec 6.99 Gpixels/sec
Feature Matching 0.89 Gpixels/sec 1.6 Gpixels/sec
Stereo Matching 492.6 Gpixels/sec 652.6 Gpixels/sec
Particle Physics 24819.2 FPS 19534.7 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]

Cinebench 2024 GPU

Hardware benchmark using Maxon's Cinema 4D rendering engine
Cinebench 2024 GPU

Passmark Graphics

Videocard test that focuses on compute shaders, multi-texturing, tessellation, and other features
G3D Mark Score
13351
22592
G2D Mark 760 1079
DirectX 11 78 FPS 199 FPS
DirectX 12 74 FPS 89 FPS
GPU Compute 5820 Ops/s 11976 Ops/s
Sources: PassMark [5], [6]1790 & 2345 samples

Blender

Rendering performance test for 3D modeling
Blender GPU
2047.42
3832.6
Sources: Blender [9], [10]795 & 2712 samples

Artificial Intelligence Tests

Performance in machine learning and artificial intelligence tasks

GeekBench 6 ML

Tests throughput of AI operations in single, half, and quantized precision
GB6 ML Single Precision
GB6 ML Half Precision
GB6 ML Quantized
Image Classification (SP) 5750 -
Image Segmentation (HP) 16175 -
Image Super Resolution (Q) 12997 -
Face Detection (HP) 21409 -
Pose Estimation (Q) 67820 -
Text Classification (SP) 849 -
Machine Translation (HP) 2627 -
Object Detection (SP) 7465 -
Depth Estimation (Q) 24186 -
Style Transfer (SP) 183238 -
Framework ONNX -
Backend DirectML -
Sources: Geekbench [9]

Specifications

Technical specifications of Intel Arc A770 and GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB

General

Vendor Intel Nvidia
Build Discrete Discrete
Released October 12, 2022 July 18, 2023
Launch price (MSRP) $329 $499
Case Desktop Desktop
Purpose Gaming Gaming
Segment Mid-range Mid-range
Architecture Generation 12.7 Ada Lovelace
GPU Codename DG2-512 AD106
Rival Equivalent - GeForce RTX 3050 -
Successor - - GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (16GB)
Recommended CPU - Intel Core i5 12500 or above - Intel Core i5 14600K or above
Desktop GPU rating (51st and 39th place)

Graphics Processing Unit

Base Clock 2100 MHz 2310 MHz
Boost Clock 2400 MHz 2535 MHz
Shading Units 4096 4352
Texture Mapping Units (TMUs) 256 136
Render Output Units (ROPs) 128 48
Compute Units (Pipelines) - 34
Tensor Cores 512 136
Ray-tracing Cores 32 34
L1 Cache - 128KB per cluster
L2 Cache 16MB shared 32MB shared
Instructions Per Cycle 2 IPC 2 IPC

Raw Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 307 GPixel/s 122 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate 614 GTexel/s 345 GTexel/s
FLOPS (FP32)
19.7 TFLOPS
22.1 TFLOPS

Physical

Interface PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x8
TGP 225 W 165 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Fabrication Process 6 nm 5 nm
Die Size 406 mm² 188 mm²
Transistor Count 21 billion 22 billion
Transistor Density 51.72 MTr/mm² 117.02 MTr/mm²

Memory

Memory Type GDDR6 GDDR6
Memory Size 16 GB 16 GB
Memory Clock 2000 MHz 2250 MHz
Effective Memory Speed 16000 Mbps 18000 Mbps
Bus 256-bit 128-bit
ECC No No
Memory Bandwidth
Arc A770 +78%
512 GB/s
288 GB/s

API

DirectX 12 12
Vulkan 1.3 1.3
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
OpenCL 3.0 3.0
CUDA - 8.9
Ray Tracing Yes Yes
DLSS No DLSS 3
DisplayPort - 1.4a

Cast your vote

Choose between two graphics cards
40 (71.4%)
16 (28.6%)
Total votes: 56

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!