Intel Arc B580 vs Arc A770

We compared two discrete desktop gaming GPUs: the Intel Arc B580 12 GB with 20 pipelines and 2560 shaders against the 2 years and 2 months older Arc A770 16 GB that utilizes 4096 shaders. Here you will find complete details about specs, efficiency, performance tests, and more.

Review

General comparison of performance in games, applications, power efficiency, and other metrics
Gaming
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan games
Workstation
Perf. in 3D modeling, video editing and rendering apps
AI/ML
Capabilities for machine learning and AI-related tasks
Energy Efficiency
Power consumption efficiency in different scenarios
NanoReview Final Score
Overall video card score

Value for money (Beta)

We use average GPU prices from all manufacturers by default. Enter the current price of a specific card for better accuracy.
Currency
12 GB GDDR6
VS
16 GB GDDR6
62.8
(Average)
Value Index
67.4
(Good)

Key differences

Key distinctions and advantages of Arc A770 over Arc B580
Reasons to consider the Intel Arc B580
  • Manufactured using a more efficient 5 nm process technology
Reasons to consider the Intel Arc A770
  • Performs slightly better (up to 13%) in 3DMark Steel Nomad Lite
  • 44% higher maximum theoretical performance (19.7 vs 13.7 TFLOPS)
  • Includes 4 GB more video memory
  • Features 352 more tensor cores for effective ML and AI workloads
  • Has 60% more shading units (4096 vs 2560)

Gaming Performance

Frame rate comparison across popular AAA titles at different resolutions

Games

FPS Table
Forza Horizon 5
123
78
67
51
119
77
64
50
The Witcher 3
147
128
91
46
147
126
91
46
Counter-Strike 2
162
116
83
40
162
114
82
42
Far Cry 6
108
98
76
43
108
98
75
41
Hogwarts Legacy
71
57
44
26
69
57
45
22
CoD: Modern Warfare III
82
85
61
38
80
81
58
37
Ghost of Tsushima
72
61
42
25
69
58
45
25
Cyberpunk 2077
90
82
55
26
86
77
53
24
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
124
107
83
43
118
105
81
43
Average FPS by Resolution
1080p High 109 106
1080p Ultra 90 88
1440p Ultra 67 66
4K Ultra 38 37
Margin of Error Low Low

Benchmarks

Graphics cards’ performance in recent benchmarking apps

3D Mark

Multiplatform graphics benchmark suite that directly correlates with performance in modern games
Steel Nomad Lite Score
11186
Arc A770 +13%
12635
Time Spy 14685 13554
Solar Bay 55846 51133
Port Royal 7939 7236
Fire Strike 36801 34120
Wild Life Extreme 28331 26276
Night Raid 125066 122449
Sources: 3DMark [1], [2]

GeekBench 6 OpenCL

GPU test for computational tasks (image processing, photography, computer vision, and ML)
GB6 Compute Score
111561
Arc A770 +2%
113935
Background Blur 284.6 img/sec 175 img/sec
Face Detection 150 img/sec 98 img/sec
Horizon Detection 2.67 Gpixels/sec 3.63 Gpixels/sec
Edge Detection 5.22 Gpixels/sec 5.51 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian Blur 6.35 Gpixels/sec 8.51 Gpixels/sec
Feature Matching 1.18 Gpixels/sec 0.89 Gpixels/sec
Stereo Matching 397 Gpixels/sec 492.6 Gpixels/sec
Particle Physics 15177.3 FPS 24819.2 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]

Passmark Graphics

Videocard test that focuses on compute shaders, multi-texturing, tessellation, and other features
G3D Mark Score
Arc B580 +20%
16050
13351
G2D Mark 702 760
DirectX 11 126 FPS 78 FPS
DirectX 12 78 FPS 74 FPS
GPU Compute 8003 Ops/s 5820 Ops/s
Sources: PassMark [5], [6]3665 & 1790 samples

Blender

Rendering performance test for 3D modeling
Blender GPU
Arc B580 +6%
2175.32
2047.42
Sources: Blender [9], [10]357 & 795 samples

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Intel Arc B580
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-07-07 (Mike)GeekBench113977
📘 2026-07-07 (Mike)Steel Nomad Light11944
📘 2026-06-17 (Mike)GeekBench103868
Intel Arc A770
No benchmark results yet

Artificial Intelligence Tests

Performance in machine learning and artificial intelligence tasks

GeekBench 6 ML

Tests throughput of AI operations in single, half, and quantized precision
GB6 ML Single Precision
Arc B580 +62%
21661
13344
GB6 ML Half Precision
Arc B580 +144%
34463
14119
GB6 ML Quantized
Arc B580 +42%
14366
10082
Image Classification (SP) 10654 5750
Image Segmentation (HP) 18608 16175
Image Super Resolution (Q) 16715 12997
Face Detection (HP) 40348 21409
Pose Estimation (Q) 64494 67820
Text Classification (SP) 3091 849
Machine Translation (HP) 3530 2627
Object Detection (SP) 13690 7465
Depth Estimation (Q) 36797 24186
Style Transfer (SP) 197057 183238
Framework ONNX ONNX
Backend DirectML DirectML
Sources: Geekbench [9], [10]

Specifications

Technical specifications of Intel Arc B580 and Arc A770

General

Vendor Intel Intel
Build Discrete Discrete
Released December 3, 2024 October 12, 2022
Launch price (MSRP) $249 $329
Case Desktop Desktop
Purpose Gaming Gaming
Segment Mid-range Mid-range
Architecture Generation 12.7 Generation 12.7
GPU Codename BMG-G21 DG2-512
Rival Equivalent - GeForce RTX 4060 - GeForce RTX 3050
Recommended CPU - Intel Core Ultra 5 245K or above - Intel Core i5 12500 or above
Desktop GPU rating (49th and 51st place)

Graphics Processing Unit

Base Clock 1700 MHz 2100 MHz
Boost Clock 2670 MHz 2400 MHz
Shading Units 2560 4096
Texture Mapping Units (TMUs) 160 256
Render Output Units (ROPs) 80 128
Compute Units (Pipelines) 20 -
Tensor Cores 160 512
Ray-tracing Cores 20 32
L1 Cache 256KB per cluster -
L2 Cache 12MB shared 16MB shared
Instructions Per Cycle 2 IPC 2 IPC

Raw Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 214 GPixel/s 307 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate 427 GTexel/s 614 GTexel/s
FLOPS (FP32)
13.7 TFLOPS
Arc A770 +44%
19.7 TFLOPS

Physical

Interface PCIe 4.0 x8 PCIe 4.0 x16
TGP 190 W 225 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Fabrication Process 5 nm 6 nm
Die Size 272 mm² 406 mm²
Transistor Count 19.6 billion 21 billion
Transistor Density 72.06 MTr/mm² 51.72 MTr/mm²

Memory

Memory Type GDDR6 GDDR6
Memory Size 12 GB 16 GB
Memory Clock 2375 MHz 2000 MHz
Effective Memory Speed 19000 Mbps 16000 Mbps
Bus 192-bit 256-bit
ECC No No
Memory Bandwidth
456 GB/s
Arc A770 +12%
512 GB/s

API

DirectX 12 12
Vulkan 1.3 1.3
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
OpenCL 3.0 3.0
CUDA No -
Ray Tracing Yes Yes
DLSS No No
DisplayPort 2.1 -

Cast your vote

Choose between two graphics cards
85 (40.9%)
123 (59.1%)
Total votes: 208

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!