AMD Radeon 780M vs Apple M5 Max GPU (40-core)

We compared two integrated laptop graphics cards: the Radeon 780M with 12 pipelines and 768 shaders against the 3 years and 3 months newer Apple M5 Max GPU (40-core) that utilizes 640 pipelines and 5120 shaders. Here you will find complete details about specs, efficiency, performance tests, and more.

Review

General comparison of performance in games, applications, power efficiency, and other metrics
Gaming
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan games
Workstation
Perf. in 3D modeling, video editing and rendering apps
AI/ML
Capabilities for machine learning and AI-related tasks
Energy Efficiency
Power consumption efficiency in different scenarios
NanoReview Final Score
Overall video card score

Key differences

Key distinctions and advantages of M5 Max GPU (40-core) over Radeon 780M
Reasons to consider the Apple M5 Max GPU (40-core)
  • Performs significantly better (up to 6.7x) in 3DMark Steel Nomad Lite
  • 3.9x higher maximum theoretical performance (16.6 vs 4.3 TFLOPS)
  • Manufactured using a more efficient 3 nm process technology
  • Achieves 4.5x more points in the GeekBench 6 Compute test (146K vs 32K)
  • Has 6.7x more shading units (5120 vs 768)

Gaming Performance

Frame rate comparison across popular AAA titles at different resolutions

Games

FPS Table
Forza Horizon 5
52
26
22
11
-
The Witcher 3
26
26
13
-
-
Counter-Strike 2
44
31
21
9
-
Far Cry 6
39
29
21
10
-
Hogwarts Legacy
22
15
11
-
-
CoD: Modern Warfare III
34
29
19
12
-
Ghost of Tsushima
21
15
10
-
-
Cyberpunk 2077
19
20
10
-
-
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
36
31
20
9
-
Average FPS by Resolution
1080p High 33 -
1080p Ultra 25 -
1440p Ultra 16 -
4K Ultra - -
Margin of Error Low Low

Benchmarks

Graphics cards’ performance in recent benchmarking apps

3D Mark

Multiplatform graphics benchmark suite that directly correlates with performance in modern games
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Time Spy 2787 -
Solar Bay 11525 79229
Port Royal 1579 -
Fire Strike 7885 -
Wild Life Extreme 5305 42463
Night Raid 33367 -
Sources: 3DMark [1], [2]

GeekBench 6 OpenCL

GPU test for computational tasks (image processing, photography, computer vision, and ML)
GB6 Compute Score
32713
146407
Background Blur 86.4 img/sec 257 img/sec
Face Detection 35.8 img/sec 182.1 img/sec
Horizon Detection 1.03 Gpixels/sec 5.4 Gpixels/sec
Edge Detection 1.36 Gpixels/sec 8.33 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian Blur 1.41 Gpixels/sec 8.86 Gpixels/sec
Feature Matching 0.41 Gpixels/sec 1.28 Gpixels/sec
Stereo Matching 132.4 Gpixels/sec 455.4 Gpixels/sec
Particle Physics 4470.7 FPS 21658 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]

Cinebench 2024 GPU

Hardware benchmark using Maxon's Cinema 4D rendering engine
Cinebench 2024 GPU

Passmark Graphics

Videocard test that focuses on compute shaders, multi-texturing, tessellation, and other features
G3D Mark Score
G2D Mark 885 -
DirectX 11 65 FPS -
DirectX 12 30 FPS -
GPU Compute 3577 Ops/s -
Sources: PassMark [5] – 12072 samples

Blender

Rendering performance test for 3D modeling
Blender GPU
262.43
8112.54
Sources: Blender [9], [10] – 182 & 250 samples

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Radeon 780M
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-10-01 -> RennsportGeekbench 6 OpenCL27852
📘 2026-10-01 -> RennsportGeekbench 7 OpenCL23850
📘 2026-10-01 -> RennsportGeekbench 7 OpenCL28775
📘 2026-08-17 -> RennsportGeekbench 6 OpenCL32197
📘 2026-02-26 (iFraan)Geekbench 6 OpenCL28558
Apple M5 Max GPU (40-core)
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-04-16 -> Apple loverGeekbench 6 OpenCL146276
📘 2026-03-25 (Steven)Cinebench 20249283
📘 2026-03-25 (Steven)Steel Nomad Light18486

Artificial Intelligence Tests

Performance in machine learning and artificial intelligence tasks

GeekBench 6 ML

Tests throughput of AI operations in single, half, and quantized precision
GB6 ML Single Precision
GB6 ML Half Precision
13510
46343
GB6 ML Quantized
Image Classification (SP) 3860 10711
Image Segmentation (HP) 5435 42406
Image Super Resolution (Q) 10580 42905
Face Detection (HP) 12855 73489
Pose Estimation (Q) 34716 289766
Text Classification (SP) 2578 6087
Machine Translation (HP) 3897 8881
Object Detection (SP) 3078 10130
Depth Estimation (Q) 14989 84224
Style Transfer (SP) 78608 264552
Framework ONNX Core ML
Backend DirectML GPU
Sources: Geekbench [9], [10]
Results were compared using different ML frameworks

Specifications

Technical specifications of Radeon 780M and Apple M5 Max GPU (40-core)

General

Vendor Amd Apple
Build Integrated Integrated
Released January 4, 2023 March 3, 2026
Case Laptop Laptop
Purpose Generic Professional
Segment Mid-range Mid-range
Architecture RDNA 3.0 Apple M GPU
GPU Codename Phoenix Custom
Rival Equivalent - Intel Arc iGPU (8-Cores) -
Successor - Radeon 8050S -
Recommended CPU - AMD Ryzen 7 7840U or above - Apple M5 Max (40-сore GPU) or above
Used in CPUs - AMD Ryzen 7 H 255
- AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS
- AMD Ryzen 7 250
- AMD Ryzen 7 260
- AMD Ryzen 9 270
- AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
- AMD Ryzen 7 8700G
- AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
- and 6 more
- Apple M5 Max (40-сore GPU)
Laptop GPU ranking (99th and 6th place)

Graphics Processing Unit

Base Clock 800 MHz -
Boost Clock 2700-2800 MHz (configurable) 1620 MHz
Shading Units 768 5120
Texture Mapping Units (TMUs) 48 320
Render Output Units (ROPs) 32 160
Compute Units (Pipelines) 12 640
Ray-tracing Cores 12 -
L1 Cache 128KB per cluster -
L2 Cache 2MB shared -
Instructions Per Cycle 2 IPC 2 IPC

Raw Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 86-90 GPixel/s 259 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate 130-134 GTexel/s 518 GTexel/s
FLOPS (FP32)
4.1-4.3 TFLOPS
16.6 TFLOPS

Physical

Interface PCIe 4.0 x8 Custom
TGP 15 W -
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Fabrication Process 4 nm 3 nm
Die Size 178 mm² -
Transistor Count 25.4 billion 28 billion
Transistor Density 142.7 MTr/mm² -
Max. Temperature - 100°C

Memory

Memory Type System Shared System Shared
Memory Clock - 9600 MHz
Bus - 512-bit
ECC - No
Memory Bandwidth

API

DirectX 12 -
Vulkan 1.3 -
OpenGL 4.6 -
OpenCL 2.1 -
Ray Tracing Yes Yes
DLSS No No
DisplayPort 2.1 -

Cast your vote

Choose between two graphics cards
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total votes: < 1

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!