AMD Radeon 780M vs Intel Arc 140T

VS
Intel Arc 140T
Arrow Lake iGPU

We compared two integrated laptop GPUs: the Radeon 780M with 12 pipelines and 768 shaders against the 2 years newer Intel Arc 140T that utilizes 8 pipelines and 1024 shaders. Here you will find complete details about specs, efficiency, performance tests, and more.

Review

General comparison of performance in games, applications, power efficiency, and other metrics
Gaming
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan games
Workstation
Perf. in 3D modeling, video editing and rendering apps
AI/ML
Capabilities for machine learning and AI-related tasks
Energy Efficiency
Power consumption efficiency in different scenarios
NanoReview Final Score
Overall video card score

Key differences

Key distinctions and advantages of Arc 140T over Radeon 780M
Reasons to consider the Radeon 780M
  • Manufactured using a more efficient 4 nm process technology
Reasons to consider the Intel Arc 140T
  • Performs better (up to 20%) in 3DMark Steel Nomad Lite
  • Achieves 30% more points in the GeekBench 6 Compute test (42K vs 32K)
  • Has 33% more shading units (1024 vs 768)

Gaming Performance

Frame rate comparison across popular AAA titles at different resolutions

Games

FPS Table
Forza Horizon 5
52
26
22
11
53
28
21
12
The Witcher 3
26
26
13
-
42
33
23
12
Counter-Strike 2
44
31
21
9
48
33
22
10
Far Cry 6
39
29
21
10
37
35
24
11
Hogwarts Legacy
22
15
11
-
19
14
-
-
CoD: Modern Warfare III
34
29
19
12
31
29
21
11
Ghost of Tsushima
21
15
10
-
21
18
13
-
Cyberpunk 2077
19
20
10
-
23
19
11
-
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
36
31
20
9
38
36
22
12
Average FPS by Resolution
1080p High 33 35
1080p Ultra 25 27
1440p Ultra 16 18
4K Ultra - 10
Margin of Error Low Low

Benchmarks

Graphics cards’ performance in recent benchmarking apps

3D Mark

Multiplatform graphics benchmark suite that directly correlates with performance in modern games
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Arc 140T +20%
3199
Time Spy 2787 3769
Solar Bay 11525 14421
Port Royal 1579 1966
Fire Strike 7885 8568
Wild Life Extreme 5305 6618
Night Raid 33367 38478
Sources: 3DMark [1], [2]

GeekBench 6 OpenCL

GPU test for computational tasks (image processing, photography, computer vision, and ML)
GB6 Compute Score
32713
Arc 140T +30%
42502
Background Blur 86.4 img/sec 90 img/sec
Face Detection 35.8 img/sec 39.5 img/sec
Horizon Detection 1.03 Gpixels/sec 1.21 Gpixels/sec
Edge Detection 1.36 Gpixels/sec 1.52 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian Blur 1.41 Gpixels/sec 2.41 Gpixels/sec
Feature Matching 0.41 Gpixels/sec 0.51 Gpixels/sec
Stereo Matching 132.4 Gpixels/sec 161.8 Gpixels/sec
Particle Physics 4470.7 FPS 9155.9 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]

Passmark Graphics

Videocard test that focuses on compute shaders, multi-texturing, tessellation, and other features
G3D Mark Score
6762
6606
G2D Mark 885 835
DirectX 11 65 FPS 47 FPS
DirectX 12 30 FPS 30 FPS
GPU Compute 3577 Ops/s 2906 Ops/s
Sources: PassMark [5], [6] – 12072 & 2088 samples

Blender

Rendering performance test for 3D modeling
Blender GPU
262.58
Arc 140T +192%
765.53
Sources: Blender [9], [10] – 179 & 41 samples

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Radeon 780M
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-08-17 -> RennsportGeekbench 6 OpenCL32197
📘 2026-02-26 (iFraan)Geekbench 6 OpenCL28558
Intel Arc 140T
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-04-16 -> Lello75Geekbench 6 OpenCL42034
📘 2025-09-19 (JacoIsHere)Geekbench 6 OpenCL42182

Artificial Intelligence Tests

Performance in machine learning and artificial intelligence tasks

GeekBench 6 ML

Tests throughput of AI operations in single, half, and quantized precision
GB6 ML Single Precision
9091
8764
GB6 ML Half Precision
13510
12046
GB6 ML Quantized
6786
5815
Image Classification (SP) 3860 5224
Image Segmentation (HP) 5435 10501
Image Super Resolution (Q) 10580 6436
Face Detection (HP) 12855 15277
Pose Estimation (Q) 34716 19008
Text Classification (SP) 2578 1566
Machine Translation (HP) 3897 2969
Object Detection (SP) 3078 6172
Depth Estimation (Q) 14989 14526
Style Transfer (SP) 78608 62049
Framework ONNX ONNX
Backend DirectML DirectML
Sources: Geekbench [9], [10]

Specifications

Technical specifications of Radeon 780M and Intel Arc 140T

General

Vendor Amd Intel
Build Integrated Integrated
Released January 4, 2023 January 6, 2025
Case Laptop Laptop
Purpose Generic Generic
Segment Mid-range Entry-level
Architecture RDNA 3.0 Xe+
GPU Codename Phoenix Arrow Lake iGPU
Rival Equivalent - Intel Arc iGPU (8-Cores) - Radeon 860M
Successor - Radeon 8050S -
Recommended CPU - AMD Ryzen 7 7840U or above - Intel Core Ultra 5 235H or above
Used in CPUs - AMD Ryzen 7 H 255
- AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS
- AMD Ryzen 7 250
- AMD Ryzen 7 260
- AMD Ryzen 9 270
- AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
- AMD Ryzen 7 8700G
- AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
- and 6 more
- Intel Core Ultra 5 235H
- Intel Core Ultra 7 255H
- Intel Core Ultra 7 265H
- Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
Laptop GPU ranking (98th and 94th place)

Graphics Processing Unit

Base Clock 800 MHz 300 MHz
Boost Clock 2700-2800 MHz (configurable) 2250-2350 MHz (configurable)
Shading Units 768 1024
Texture Mapping Units (TMUs) 48 64
Render Output Units (ROPs) 32 32
Compute Units (Pipelines) 12 8
Tensor Cores - 128
Ray-tracing Cores 12 8
L1 Cache 128KB per cluster -
L2 Cache 2MB shared 4MB shared
Instructions Per Cycle 2 IPC 2 IPC

Raw Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 86-90 GPixel/s 72-75 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate 130-134 GTexel/s 144-150 GTexel/s
FLOPS (FP32)
4.1-4.3 TFLOPS
Arc 140T +12%
4.6-4.8 TFLOPS

Physical

Interface PCIe 4.0 x8 PCIe 4.0 x8
TGP 15 W 35 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Fabrication Process 4 nm 5 nm
Die Size 178 mm² -
Transistor Count 25.4 billion -
Transistor Density 142.7 MTr/mm² -
Max. Temperature - 110°C

Memory

Memory Type System Shared System Shared

API

DirectX 12 12.2
Vulkan 1.3 1.3
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
OpenCL 2.1 3.0
CUDA - No
Ray Tracing Yes Yes
DLSS No No
DisplayPort 2.1 2.1

Cast your vote

Choose between two graphics cards
50 (45%)
61 (55%)
Total votes: 111

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
David May 29, 2026 at 02:37 AM
My guy 780m still rocking hard !!!
0 Reply
akp831 June 14, 2026 at 02:31 PM
680m is rocking hard as well
0 Reply
Avatar
nanotech December 27, 2025 at 04:22 AM
Not bad for aIntel igpu buts its also 15w vs 35w
+6 Reply
Avatar
ComputerNerd November 7, 2025 at 12:57 PM
I'm very impressed with the Arc 140T iGPU. You can game on it and do light video editing using Intel's QuickSynch feature. The gaming part is on par or slightly better than the 780M, which is excellent for an iGPU in it's own right. Also, Intel has improved on the gaming driver's department. Thus, making gaming on Intel's new iGPUs respectable at the very least.
+4 Reply