AMD Radeon 8050S vs Adreno X2-90
AMD Radeon 8050S
Strix Halo
Adreno X2-90
Adreno X2
We compared two integrated laptop GPUs: the Radeon 8050S with 32 pipelines and 2048 shaders against the 9 months newer Adreno X2-90 that utilizes 12 pipelines and 2048 shaders. Here you will find complete details about specs, efficiency, performance tests, and more.
Review
Gaming
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan games
Workstation
Perf. in 3D modeling, video editing and rendering apps
Energy Efficiency
Power consumption efficiency in different scenarios
NanoReview Final Score
Overall video card score
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Radeon 8050S
- Performs significantly better (up to 66%) in 3DMark Steel Nomad Lite
- 51% higher maximum theoretical performance (11.5 vs 7.6 TFLOPS)
Reasons to consider the Adreno X2-90
- Manufactured using a more efficient 3 nm process technology
Gaming Performance
Frame rate comparison across popular AAA titles at different resolutionsGames
| Forza Horizon 5 | 127 68 59 38 |
- |
| The Witcher 3 | 113 94 60 33 |
- |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 178 124 88 47 |
- |
| Far Cry 6 | 98 89 64 34 |
- |
| Hogwarts Legacy | 65 57 40 21 |
- |
| CoD: Modern Warfare III | 89 81 54 35 |
- |
| Ghost of Tsushima | 71 58 41 19 |
- |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 67 60 33 17 |
- |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 118 103 71 36 |
- |
| 1080p High | 103 | - |
| 1080p Ultra | 82 | - |
| 1440p Ultra | 57 | - |
| 4K Ultra | 31 | - |
| Margin of Error | Medium | Low |
Benchmarks
Graphics cards’ performance in recent benchmarking apps3D Mark
Steel Nomad Lite Score
| Time Spy | 9171 | 3644 |
| Solar Bay | 41110 | 24178 |
| Port Royal | 5181 | 1578 |
| Fire Strike | 24607 | 10109 |
| Wild Life Extreme | 18225 | 10017 |
| Night Raid | 98347 | 57060 |
GeekBench 6 GPU Compute
GB6 Compute Score
| Background Blur | 201.1 img/sec | - |
| Face Detection | 104.8 img/sec | - |
| Horizon Detection | 2.53 Gpixels/sec | - |
| Edge Detection | 3.37 Gpixels/sec | - |
| Gaussian Blur | 3.12 Gpixels/sec | - |
| Feature Matching | 0.93 Gpixels/sec | - |
| Stereo Matching | 327.5 Gpixels/sec | - |
| Particle Physics | 12215.6 FPS | - |
| API | OpenCL | - |
Passmark Graphics
G3D Mark Score
| G2D Mark | 1125 | 604 |
| DirectX 11 | 149 FPS | 58 FPS |
| DirectX 12 | 70 FPS | 30 FPS |
| GPU Compute | 7622 Ops/s | 3552 Ops/s |
Artificial Intelligence Tests
Performance in machine learning and artificial intelligence tasksGeekBench 6 ML
GB6 ML Single Precision
GB6 ML Half Precision
GB6 ML Quantized
| Image Classification (SP) | 9259 | - |
| Image Segmentation (HP) | 11219 | - |
| Image Super Resolution (Q) | 19775 | - |
| Face Detection (HP) | 31987 | - |
| Pose Estimation (Q) | 62399 | - |
| Text Classification (SP) | 3757 | - |
| Machine Translation (HP) | 6121 | - |
| Object Detection (SP) | 6979 | - |
| Depth Estimation (Q) | 35735 | - |
| Style Transfer (SP) | 129996 | - |
| Framework | ONNX | - |
| Backend | DirectML | - |
Specifications
Technical specifications of Radeon 8050S and Adreno X2-90General
| Vendor | Amd | Qualcomm |
| Build | Integrated | Integrated |
| Released | January 7, 2025 | September 25, 2025 |
| Case | Laptop | Laptop |
| Purpose | Generic | Generic |
| Segment | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.5 | Adreno X2 |
| GPU Codename | Strix Halo | Adreno X2 |
| Rival Equivalent | - GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop | - Apple M4 Max GPU (40-core) |
| Recommended CPU | - AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 or above | - Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite Extreme (X2E-96-100) or above |
| Used in CPUs | - AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 - AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 490 - AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 - AMD Ryzen AI Max 390 |
- Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite (X2E-90-100) - Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite (X2E-88-100) - Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite Extreme (X2E-94-100) - Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite Extreme (X2E-96-100) |
Laptop GPU ranking (36th and 35th place)
Graphics Processing Unit
| Base Clock | 1295 MHz | 500 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 2800 MHz | 1700-1850 MHz (configurable) |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2048 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMUs) | 128 | 128 |
| Render Output Units (ROPs) | 64 | 64 |
| Compute Units (Pipelines) | 32 | 12 |
| Tensor Cores | No | No |
| Ray-tracing Cores | 32 | - |
| L2 Cache | 2MB shared | - |
| Instructions Per Cycle | 2 IPC | 2 IPC |
Raw Performance
| Pixel Fill Rate | 179 GPixel/s | 109-118 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 358 GTexel/s | 218-237 GTexel/s |
FLOPS (FP32)
Physical
| Interface | PCIe 5.0 x16 | IGP |
| TGP | 55 W | - |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Fabrication Process | 4 nm | 3 nm |
| Die Size | 308 mm² | 220 mm² |
| Max. Temperature | 100°C | - |
Memory
| Memory Type | System Shared | System Shared |
| Bus | - | 192-bit |
| ECC | No | No |
Memory Bandwidth
API
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | - |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 3.0 |
| CUDA | No | No |
| Ray Tracing | Yes | Yes |
| DLSS | No | No |
| DisplayPort | 2.1a | 1.4 |
Cast your vote
Total votes: < 1