AMD Radeon 8050S vs GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop

We performed a head-to-head comparison of the Radeon 8050S with 32 pipelines and 2048 shaders against the 1 year and 11 months older GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile 6 GB that utilizes 20 pipelines and 2560 shaders. Here you will find complete details about specs, efficiency, performance tests, and more.

Some GPUs come in different configurations. For greater precision, pick a specific config below
TGP / Version -

Review

General comparison of performance in games, applications, power efficiency, and other metrics
Gaming
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan games
Workstation
Perf. in 3D modeling, video editing and rendering apps
AI/ML
Capabilities for machine learning and AI-related tasks
Energy Efficiency
Power consumption efficiency in different scenarios
NanoReview Final Score
Overall video card score

Key differences

Key distinctions and advantages of RTX 4050 Mobile over Radeon 8050S
Reasons to consider the Radeon 8050S
  • Manufactured using a more efficient 4 nm process technology
Reasons to consider the GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop
  • Includes 6 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory
  • Supports Nvidia DLSS 3 technology
  • Has 25% more shading units (2560 vs 2048)
  • Features 80 tensor cores for effective deep learning and AI workloads

Gaming Performance

Frame rate comparison across popular AAA titles at different resolutions

Games

FPS Table
Forza Horizon 5
127
68
59
38
107
66
56
35
The Witcher 3
113
94
60
33
117
91
67
34
Counter-Strike 2
178
124
88
47
167
126
88
43
Far Cry 6
98
89
64
34
87
79
59
32
Hogwarts Legacy
65
57
40
21
62
52
34
20
CoD: Modern Warfare III
89
81
54
35
75
68
44
30
Ghost of Tsushima
71
58
41
19
57
45
33
17
Cyberpunk 2077
67
60
33
17
61
57
34
13
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
118
103
71
36
98
90
62
32
Average FPS by Resolution
1080p High 103 92
1080p Ultra 82 75
1440p Ultra 57 53
4K Ultra 31 28
Margin of Error Medium Low

Benchmarks

Graphics cards’ performance in recent benchmarking apps

3D Mark

Multiplatform graphics benchmark suite that directly correlates with performance in modern games
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Time Spy 9171 8212
Solar Bay 41110 35375
Port Royal 5181 4624
Fire Strike 24607 21909
Wild Life Extreme 18225 15492
Night Raid 98347 84848
Sources: 3DMark [1], [2]

GeekBench 6 OpenCL

GPU test for computational tasks (image processing, photography, computer vision, and ML)
GB6 Compute Score
Background Blur 201.1 img/sec 141.4 img/sec
Face Detection 104.8 img/sec 84.1 img/sec
Horizon Detection 2.53 Gpixels/sec 3.07 Gpixels/sec
Edge Detection 3.37 Gpixels/sec 3.91 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian Blur 3.12 Gpixels/sec 3.85 Gpixels/sec
Feature Matching 0.93 Gpixels/sec 1.1 Gpixels/sec
Stereo Matching 327.5 Gpixels/sec 325.9 Gpixels/sec
Particle Physics 12215.6 FPS 11008.8 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]

Cinebench 2024 GPU

Hardware benchmark using Maxon's Cinema 4D rendering engine
Cinebench 2024 GPU

Passmark Graphics

Videocard test that focuses on compute shaders, multi-texturing, tessellation, and other features
G3D Mark Score
16443
G2D Mark 1126 622
DirectX 11 149 FPS 129 FPS
DirectX 12 70 FPS 60 FPS
GPU Compute 7649 Ops/s 5847 Ops/s
Sources: PassMark [5], [6] – 189 & 14311 samples

Blender

Rendering performance test for 3D modeling
Blender GPU
1188.98
2568.81
Sources: Blender [9], [10] – 3 & 2080 samples

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Radeon 8050S
No benchmark results yet
GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-07-17 (kam)Geekbench 6 OpenCL93074
📘 2026-07-15 (Mr._.Flexo)Cinebench 20248096
📘 2026-07-02 (SuperDuck)Geekbench 6 OpenCL90032
📘 2026-05-18 (TheMan)Cinebench 20248523
📘 2026-05-15 -> ZayGeekbench 6 OpenCL89343

Artificial Intelligence Tests

Performance in machine learning and artificial intelligence tasks

GeekBench 6 ML

Tests throughput of AI operations in single, half, and quantized precision
GB6 ML Single Precision
18145
GB6 ML Half Precision
22099
27160
GB6 ML Quantized
14884
Image Classification (SP) 9259 6233
Image Segmentation (HP) 11219 16395
Image Super Resolution (Q) 19775 18240
Face Detection (HP) 31987 30758
Pose Estimation (Q) 62399 61300
Text Classification (SP) 3757 3124
Machine Translation (HP) 6121 4357
Object Detection (SP) 6979 7812
Depth Estimation (Q) 35735 29192
Style Transfer (SP) 129996 117759
Framework ONNX ONNX
Backend DirectML DirectML
Sources: Geekbench [9], [10]

Specifications

Technical specifications of Radeon 8050S and GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop

General

Vendor Amd Nvidia
Build Integrated Discrete
Released January 7, 2025 February 22, 2023
Case Laptop Laptop
Purpose Generic Gaming
Segment Mid-range Entry-level
Architecture RDNA 3.5 Ada Lovelace
GPU Codename Strix Halo AD107 (GN21-X2)
Rival Equivalent - GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop - Radeon RX 7700S
Successor - - GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
Recommended CPU - AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 or above - Intel Core Ultra 7 155H or above
Used in CPUs - AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 490
- AMD Ryzen AI Max 385
- AMD Ryzen AI Max 390
-
Laptop GPU ranking (36th and 66th place)

Graphics Processing Unit

Base Clock 1295 MHz 1140-2070 MHz (configurable)
Boost Clock 2800 MHz 1605-2370 MHz (configurable)
Shading Units 2048 2560
Texture Mapping Units (TMUs) 128 80
Render Output Units (ROPs) 64 32
Compute Units (Pipelines) 32 20
Tensor Cores No 80
Ray-tracing Cores 32 20
L1 Cache - 128KB per cluster
L2 Cache 2MB shared 12MB shared
Instructions Per Cycle 2 IPC 2 IPC

Raw Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 179 GPixel/s 51-76 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate 358 GTexel/s 128-190 GTexel/s
FLOPS (FP32)
11.5 TFLOPS
8.2-12.1 TFLOPS

Physical

Interface PCIe 5.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x16
TGP 55 W 35-140 W (configurable)
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Fabrication Process 4 nm 5 nm
Die Size 308 mm² 156 mm²
Transistor Count - 18.9 billion
Transistor Density - 121.15 MTr/mm²
Max. Temperature 100°C -

Memory

Memory Type System Shared GDDR6
Memory Size - 6 GB
Memory Clock - 2000 MHz
Effective Memory Speed - 16000 Mbps
Bus - 96-bit
ECC No No
Memory Bandwidth

API

DirectX 12.2 12
Vulkan 1.4 1.3
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
OpenCL 2.1 3.0
CUDA No 8.9
Ray Tracing Yes Yes
DLSS No DLSS 3
DisplayPort 2.1a 1.4a

Cast your vote

Choose between two graphics cards
7 (63.6%)
4 (36.4%)
Total votes: 11

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!