AMD Radeon 820M vs Adreno X1-45

VS
AMD Radeon 820M
Krackan Point
Adreno X1-45
Adreno X1

We compared two integrated laptop GPUs: the Radeon 820M with 2 pipelines and 128 shaders against the 1 year and 3 months older Adreno X1-45 that utilizes 3 pipelines and 768 shaders. Here you will find complete details about specs, efficiency, performance tests, and more.

Review

General comparison of performance in games, applications, power efficiency, and other metrics
Gaming
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan games
Workstation
Perf. in 3D modeling, video editing and rendering apps
Energy Efficiency
Power consumption efficiency in different scenarios
NanoReview Final Score
Overall video card score

Key differences

Key distinctions and advantages of Adreno X1-45 over Radeon 820M
Reasons to consider the Adreno X1-45
  • 3x higher maximum theoretical performance (2.1 vs 0.7 TFLOPS)
  • Has 6x more shading units (768 vs 128)

Benchmarks

Graphics cards’ performance in recent benchmarking apps

3D Mark

Multiplatform graphics benchmark suite that directly correlates with performance in modern games
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Time Spy - 928
Solar Bay - 5990
Fire Strike - 3707
Wild Life Extreme - 3225
Night Raid - 16550
Sources: 3DMark [1]

GeekBench 6 GPU Compute

GPU test for computational tasks (image processing, photography, computer vision, and ML)
GB6 Compute Score
Background Blur - 14.2 img/sec
Face Detection - 6.82 img/sec
Horizon Detection - 0.56 Gpixels/sec
Edge Detection - 0.65 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian Blur - 0.55 Gpixels/sec
Feature Matching - 0.12 Gpixels/sec
Stereo Matching - 26.6 Gpixels/sec
Particle Physics - 1746.7 FPS
API - OpenCL
Sources: Geekbench [3]

Passmark Graphics

Videocard test that focuses on compute shaders, multi-texturing, tessellation, and other features
G3D Mark Score
2199
G2D Mark 756 348
DirectX 11 21 FPS 13 FPS
DirectX 12 10 FPS 10 FPS
GPU Compute 986 Ops/s 807 Ops/s
Sources: PassMark [5], [6] – 85 & 696 samples

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Radeon 820M
No benchmark results yet
Adreno X1-45
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2025-03-18 (Rennsport)Geekbench 6 OpenCL9564

Specifications

Technical specifications of Radeon 820M and Adreno X1-45

General

Vendor Amd Qualcomm
Build Integrated Integrated
Released January 6, 2025 October 24, 2023
Case Laptop Laptop
Purpose Generic Generic
Segment Entry-level Entry-level
Architecture RDNA 3.5 Adreno X1
GPU Codename Krackan Point Adreno X1
Rival Equivalent - Intel Xe3 Graphics (2-Core) - Apple M2 GPU (8-core)
Recommended CPU - AMD Ryzen AI 5 330 or above - Qualcomm Snapdragon X (X1-26-100) or above
Used in CPUs - AMD Ryzen AI 5 330 - Qualcomm Snapdragon X (X1-26-100)
- Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus (X1P-42-100)
- Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus (X1P-46-100)
Laptop GPU ranking (62nd and 106th place)

Graphics Processing Unit

Base Clock 400 MHz 280 MHz
Boost Clock 2800 MHz 1107-1367 MHz (configurable)
Shading Units 128 768
Texture Mapping Units (TMUs) 8 48
Render Output Units (ROPs) 4 24
Compute Units (Pipelines) 2 3
Tensor Cores No -
Ray-tracing Cores 2 -
L1 Cache 128KB per cluster 192KB per cluster
L2 Cache 1MB shared 1MB shared
Instructions Per Cycle 2 IPC 2 IPC

Raw Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 11 GPixel/s 27-33 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate 22 GTexel/s 53-66 GTexel/s
FLOPS (FP32)
0.7 TFLOPS
Adreno X1-45 +200%
1.7-2.1 TFLOPS

Physical

Interface PCIe 4.0 x8 IGP
TGP 15 W -
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Fabrication Process 4 nm 4 nm
Die Size 195 mm² -
Max. Temperature 100°C -

Memory

Memory Type System Shared System Shared
ECC No -

API

DirectX 12 12.1
Vulkan 1.4 1.3
OpenGL 4.6 3.2
OpenCL 2.1 3.0
CUDA No No
Ray Tracing Yes Yes
DLSS No No
DisplayPort 2.1 1.4

Cast your vote

Choose between two graphics cards
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total votes: < 1

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!