AMD Radeon 840M vs Intel Xe3 Graphics (4-Core)

We compared two integrated laptop GPUs: the Radeon 840M with 4 pipelines and 256 shaders against the 1 year newer Intel Xe3 Graphics (4-Core) that utilizes 4 pipelines and 512 shaders. Here you will find complete details about specs, efficiency, performance tests, and more.

Review

General comparison of performance in games, applications, power efficiency, and other metrics
Gaming
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan games
Workstation
Perf. in 3D modeling, video editing and rendering apps
AI/ML
Capabilities for machine learning and AI-related tasks
Energy Efficiency
Power consumption efficiency in different scenarios
NanoReview Final Score
Overall video card score

Key differences

Key distinctions and advantages of Xe3 Graphics (4-Core) over Radeon 840M
Reasons to consider the Intel Xe3 Graphics (4-Core)
  • 73% higher maximum theoretical performance (2.6 vs 1.5 TFLOPS)
  • Manufactured using a more efficient 3 nm process technology
  • Achieves 65% more points in the GeekBench 6 Compute test (23K vs 14K)
  • Has 2x more shading units (512 vs 256)
  • Features 32 tensor cores for effective deep learning and AI workloads

Gaming Performance

Frame rate comparison across popular AAA titles at different resolutions

Games

FPS Table
Forza Horizon 5
25
14
12
-
-
The Witcher 3
11
12
-
-
-
Counter-Strike 2
27
20
14
-
-
Far Cry 6
21
17
12
-
-
Hogwarts Legacy
11
-
-
-
-
CoD: Modern Warfare III
22
19
14
9
-
Ghost of Tsushima
13
10
-
-
-
Cyberpunk 2077
10
10
-
-
-
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
16
18
11
-
-
Average FPS by Resolution
1080p High 17 -
1080p Ultra 14 -
1440p Ultra 10 -
4K Ultra - -
Margin of Error High High

Benchmarks

Graphics cards’ performance in recent benchmarking apps

3D Mark

Multiplatform graphics benchmark suite that directly correlates with performance in modern games
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Time Spy 1699 -
Solar Bay 6960 -
Port Royal 553 -
Fire Strike 5303 -
Wild Life Extreme 2671 -
Night Raid 22563 -
Sources: 3DMark [1]

GeekBench 6 OpenCL

GPU test for computational tasks (image processing, photography, computer vision, and ML)
GB6 Compute Score
Background Blur 31.8 img/sec 57.6 img/sec
Face Detection 16.8 img/sec 29.1 img/sec
Horizon Detection 0.46 Gpixels/sec 0.79 Gpixels/sec
Edge Detection 0.58 Gpixels/sec 1.02 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian Blur 0.42 Gpixels/sec 1.02 Gpixels/sec
Feature Matching 0.18 Gpixels/sec 0.34 Gpixels/sec
Stereo Matching 52.5 Gpixels/sec 61.2 Gpixels/sec
Particle Physics 2048.6 FPS 3352.7 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]

Passmark Graphics

Videocard test that focuses on compute shaders, multi-texturing, tessellation, and other features
G3D Mark Score
G2D Mark 870 -
DirectX 11 32 FPS -
DirectX 12 17 FPS -
GPU Compute 1697 Ops/s -
Sources: PassMark [5] – 1020 samples

Blender

Rendering performance test for 3D modeling
Blender GPU
Sources: Blender [9] – 12 samples

Artificial Intelligence Tests

Performance in machine learning and artificial intelligence tasks

GeekBench 6 ML

Tests throughput of AI operations in single, half, and quantized precision
GB6 ML Single Precision
GB6 ML Half Precision
GB6 ML Quantized
Image Classification (SP) 1988 4265
Image Segmentation (HP) 2184 11549
Image Super Resolution (Q) 4788 4466
Face Detection (HP) 6857 16012
Pose Estimation (Q) 17396 8425
Text Classification (SP) 1628 1380
Machine Translation (HP) 2053 4037
Object Detection (SP) 1825 4026
Depth Estimation (Q) 8471 10708
Style Transfer (SP) 31032 35823
Framework ONNX ONNX
Backend DirectML DirectML
Sources: Geekbench [9], [10]

Specifications

Technical specifications of Radeon 840M and Intel Xe3 Graphics (4-Core)

General

Vendor Amd Intel
Build Integrated Integrated
Released January 7, 2025 January 5, 2026
Case Laptop Laptop
Purpose Generic Generic
Segment Entry-level Entry-level
Architecture RDNA 3.5 Celestial
GPU Codename Krackan Point Panther Lake
Rival Equivalent - Intel Arc 130T -
Recommended CPU - AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 or above - Intel Core Ultra 9 386H or above
Used in CPUs - AMD Ryzen AI 7 345
- AMD Ryzen AI 5 430
- AMD Ryzen AI 7 445
- AMD Ryzen AI 5 435
- AMD Ryzen AI 5 440
- AMD Ryzen AI 5 340
- Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
- Intel Core Ultra 7 366H
- Intel Core Ultra 7 365
- Intel Core Ultra 7 356H
- Intel Core Ultra 7 355
- Intel Core Ultra 5 336H
- Intel Core Ultra 5 335
- Intel Core Ultra 5 325
Laptop GPU ranking (107th and 75th place)

Graphics Processing Unit

Base Clock 400 MHz 300 MHz
Boost Clock 2900 MHz 2500 MHz
Shading Units 256 512
Texture Mapping Units (TMUs) 16 32
Render Output Units (ROPs) 8 16
Compute Units (Pipelines) 4 4
Tensor Cores No 32
Ray-tracing Cores 4 4
L1 Cache 128KB per cluster 64KB per cluster
L2 Cache 1MB shared 4MB shared
Instructions Per Cycle 2 IPC 2 IPC

Raw Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 23 GPixel/s 40 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate 46 GTexel/s 80 GTexel/s
FLOPS (FP32)
1.5 TFLOPS
2.6 TFLOPS

Physical

Interface PCIe 4.0 x8 PCIe 5.0
TGP 15 W 25 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Fabrication Process 4 nm 3 nm
Die Size 195 mm² -
Max. Temperature 100°C 100°C

Memory

Memory Type System Shared System Shared
ECC No No

API

DirectX 12 12.1
Vulkan 1.4 1.4
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
OpenCL 2.1 3.0
CUDA No -
Ray Tracing Yes Yes
DLSS No No
DisplayPort 2.1 2.1

Cast your vote

Choose between two graphics cards
0 (0%)
3 (100%)
Total votes: 3

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!