Intel Xe3 Graphics (4-Core) vs Arc iGPU (4-Cores)

We compared two integrated laptop GPUs: the Intel Xe3 Graphics (4-Core) with 4 pipelines and 512 shaders against the 2 years and 1 month older Arc iGPU (4-Cores) that utilizes 64 pipelines and 512 shaders. Here you will find complete details about specs, efficiency, performance tests, and more.

Review

General comparison of performance in games, applications, power efficiency, and other metrics
Gaming
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan games
Workstation
Perf. in 3D modeling, video editing and rendering apps
AI/ML
Capabilities for machine learning and AI-related tasks
Energy Efficiency
Power consumption efficiency in different scenarios
NanoReview Final Score
Overall video card score

Key differences

Key distinctions and advantages of Arc iGPU (4-Cores) over Xe3 Graphics (4-Core)
Reasons to consider the Intel Xe3 Graphics (4-Core)
  • Manufactured using a more efficient 3 nm process technology
  • 30% higher maximum theoretical performance (2.6 vs 2 TFLOPS)
  • Achieves 42% more points in the GeekBench 6 Compute test (23K vs 16K)

Benchmarks

Graphics cards’ performance in recent benchmarking apps

GeekBench 6 OpenCL

GPU test for computational tasks (image processing, photography, computer vision, and ML)
GB6 Compute Score
Background Blur 57.6 img/sec 37.6 img/sec
Face Detection 29.1 img/sec 17.2 img/sec
Horizon Detection 0.79 Gpixels/sec 0.3 Gpixels/sec
Edge Detection 1.02 Gpixels/sec 0.63 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian Blur 1.02 Gpixels/sec 0.94 Gpixels/sec
Feature Matching 0.34 Gpixels/sec 0.22 Gpixels/sec
Stereo Matching 61.2 Gpixels/sec 60 Gpixels/sec
Particle Physics 3352.7 FPS 3695.9 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]

Artificial Intelligence Tests

Performance in machine learning and artificial intelligence tasks

GeekBench 6 ML

Tests throughput of AI operations in single, half, and quantized precision
GB6 ML Single Precision
GB6 ML Half Precision
GB6 ML Quantized
Image Classification (SP) 4265 2902
Image Segmentation (HP) 11549 5473
Image Super Resolution (Q) 4466 2967
Face Detection (HP) 16012 6068
Pose Estimation (Q) 8425 8220
Text Classification (SP) 1380 609
Machine Translation (HP) 4037 1146
Object Detection (SP) 4026 2766
Depth Estimation (Q) 10708 6405
Style Transfer (SP) 35823 26796
Framework ONNX ONNX
Backend DirectML DirectML
Sources: Geekbench [9], [10]

Specifications

Technical specifications of Intel Xe3 Graphics (4-Core) and Arc iGPU (4-Cores)

General

Vendor Intel Intel
Build Integrated Integrated
Released January 5, 2026 December 14, 2023
Case Laptop Laptop
Purpose Generic Generic
Segment Entry-level Mid-range
Architecture Celestial Xe LPG
GPU Codename Panther Lake -
Rival Equivalent - - Radeon 740M
Recommended CPU - Intel Core Ultra 9 386H or above - Intel Core Ultra 5 125U or above
Used in CPUs - Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
- Intel Core Ultra 7 366H
- Intel Core Ultra 7 365
- Intel Core Ultra 7 356H
- Intel Core Ultra 7 355
- Intel Core Ultra 5 336H
- Intel Core Ultra 5 335
- Intel Core Ultra 5 325
- Intel Core Ultra 7 251HX
- Intel Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus
- Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus
- Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus
- Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus
- Intel Core Ultra 5 225U
- Intel Core Ultra 5 235U
- Intel Core Ultra 7 255U
- and 12 more
Laptop GPU ranking (76th and 98th place)

Graphics Processing Unit

Base Clock 300 MHz 300 MHz
Boost Clock 2500 MHz 1750-2000 MHz (configurable)
Shading Units 512 512
Texture Mapping Units (TMUs) 32 32
Render Output Units (ROPs) 16 16
Compute Units (Pipelines) 4 64
Tensor Cores 32 -
Ray-tracing Cores 4 4
L1 Cache 64KB per cluster 768KB shared
L2 Cache 4MB shared -
Instructions Per Cycle 2 IPC 2 IPC

Raw Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 40 GPixel/s 28-32 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate 80 GTexel/s 56-64 GTexel/s
FLOPS (FP32)
2.6 TFLOPS
1.8-2 TFLOPS

Physical

Interface PCIe 5.0 Ring Bus
TGP 25 W 14 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Fabrication Process 3 nm 5 nm
Max. Temperature 100°C -

Memory

Memory Type System Shared System Shared
ECC No -

API

DirectX 12.1 12
Vulkan 1.4 1.3
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
OpenCL 3.0 3.0
Ray Tracing Yes Yes
DLSS No No
DisplayPort 2.1 2.1

Cast your vote

Choose between two graphics cards
13 (100%)
0 (0%)
Total votes: 13

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
idk my name May 11, 2026 at 04:57 AM
Whats the difference
0 Reply
Avatar
1.8nm July 18, 2026 at 11:27 AM
Difference is the new architecture.
0 Reply