AMD Radeon 860M vs Intel Xe3 Graphics (4-Core)

We compared two integrated laptop GPUs: the Radeon 860M with 8 pipelines and 512 shaders against the 1 year newer Intel Xe3 Graphics (4-Core) that utilizes 4 pipelines and 512 shaders. Here you will find complete details about specs, efficiency, performance tests, and more.

Review

General comparison of performance in games, applications, power efficiency, and other metrics
Gaming
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan games
Workstation
Perf. in 3D modeling, video editing and rendering apps
AI/ML
Capabilities for machine learning and AI-related tasks
Energy Efficiency
Power consumption efficiency in different scenarios
NanoReview Final Score
Overall video card score

Key differences

Key distinctions and advantages of Xe3 Graphics (4-Core) over Radeon 860M
Reasons to consider the Radeon 860M
  • 19% higher maximum theoretical performance (3.1 vs 2.6 TFLOPS)
Reasons to consider the Intel Xe3 Graphics (4-Core)
  • Manufactured using a more efficient 3 nm process technology
  • Features 32 tensor cores for effective deep learning and AI workloads

Gaming Performance

Frame rate comparison across popular AAA titles at different resolutions

Games

FPS Table
Forza Horizon 5
41
24
20
11
-
The Witcher 3
19
18
11
-
-
Counter-Strike 2
39
26
19
9
-
Far Cry 6
31
26
16
9
-
Hogwarts Legacy
16
12
10
-
-
CoD: Modern Warfare III
28
27
17
12
-
Ghost of Tsushima
16
12
9
-
-
Cyberpunk 2077
19
13
-
-
-
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
29
22
15
-
-
Average FPS by Resolution
1080p High 26 -
1080p Ultra 20 -
1440p Ultra 14 -
4K Ultra - -
Margin of Error Low High

Benchmarks

Graphics cards’ performance in recent benchmarking apps

3D Mark

Multiplatform graphics benchmark suite that directly correlates with performance in modern games
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Time Spy 2604 -
Solar Bay 11094 -
Port Royal 1046 -
Fire Strike 6772 -
Wild Life Extreme 5124 -
Night Raid 29064 -
Sources: 3DMark [1]

GeekBench 6 OpenCL

GPU test for computational tasks (image processing, photography, computer vision, and ML)
GB6 Compute Score
Background Blur 57.2 img/sec 57.6 img/sec
Face Detection 30.5 img/sec 29.1 img/sec
Horizon Detection 0.83 Gpixels/sec 0.79 Gpixels/sec
Edge Detection 1.16 Gpixels/sec 1.02 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian Blur 0.93 Gpixels/sec 1.02 Gpixels/sec
Feature Matching 0.35 Gpixels/sec 0.34 Gpixels/sec
Stereo Matching 97.8 Gpixels/sec 61.2 Gpixels/sec
Particle Physics 3933.5 FPS 3352.7 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]

Passmark Graphics

Videocard test that focuses on compute shaders, multi-texturing, tessellation, and other features
G3D Mark Score
G2D Mark 918 -
DirectX 11 37 FPS -
DirectX 12 25 FPS -
GPU Compute 2434 Ops/s -
Sources: PassMark [5] – 2139 samples

Blender

Rendering performance test for 3D modeling
Blender GPU
Sources: Blender [9] – 32 samples

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Radeon 860M
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-08-17 (flauzwerfer)Geekbench 6 OpenCL24017
📘 2026-08-17 (flauzwerfer)Steel Nomad Light2476
📘 2026-07-04 -> Starjack36Geekbench 6 OpenCL24971
Intel Xe3 Graphics (4-Core)
No benchmark results yet

Artificial Intelligence Tests

Performance in machine learning and artificial intelligence tasks

GeekBench 6 ML

Tests throughput of AI operations in single, half, and quantized precision
GB6 ML Single Precision
GB6 ML Half Precision
GB6 ML Quantized
Image Classification (SP) 2022 4265
Image Segmentation (HP) 3987 11549
Image Super Resolution (Q) 6657 4466
Face Detection (HP) 10337 16012
Pose Estimation (Q) 28437 8425
Text Classification (SP) 2326 1380
Machine Translation (HP) 4011 4037
Object Detection (SP) 1995 4026
Depth Estimation (Q) 12031 10708
Style Transfer (SP) 56710 35823
Framework ONNX ONNX
Backend DirectML DirectML
Sources: Geekbench [9], [10]

Specifications

Technical specifications of Radeon 860M and Intel Xe3 Graphics (4-Core)

General

Vendor Amd Intel
Build Integrated Integrated
Released January 7, 2025 January 5, 2026
Case Laptop Laptop
Purpose Generic Generic
Segment Mid-range Entry-level
Architecture RDNA 3.5 Celestial
GPU Codename Krackan Point Panther Lake
Rival Equivalent - Intel Arc 140T -
Successor - Radeon 8040S -
Recommended CPU - AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 or above - Intel Core Ultra 9 386H or above
Used in CPUs - AMD Ryzen AI 7 450
- AMD Ryzen AI 7 350
- Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
- Intel Core Ultra 7 366H
- Intel Core Ultra 7 365
- Intel Core Ultra 7 356H
- Intel Core Ultra 7 355
- Intel Core Ultra 5 336H
- Intel Core Ultra 5 335
- Intel Core Ultra 5 325
Laptop GPU ranking (100th and 75th place)

Graphics Processing Unit

Base Clock 600 MHz 300 MHz
Boost Clock 3000 MHz 2500 MHz
Shading Units 512 512
Texture Mapping Units (TMUs) 32 32
Render Output Units (ROPs) 16 16
Compute Units (Pipelines) 8 4
Tensor Cores No 32
Ray-tracing Cores 8 4
L1 Cache 128KB per cluster 64KB per cluster
L2 Cache 2MB shared 4MB shared
Instructions Per Cycle 2 IPC 2 IPC

Raw Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 48 GPixel/s 40 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate 96 GTexel/s 80 GTexel/s
FLOPS (FP32)
3.1 TFLOPS

Physical

Interface PCIe 4.0 x8 PCIe 5.0
TGP 15 W 25 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Fabrication Process 4 nm 3 nm
Die Size 233 mm² -
Transistor Count 34 billion -
Transistor Density 145.92 MTr/mm² -
Max. Temperature 100°C 100°C

Memory

Memory Type System Shared System Shared
ECC No No

API

DirectX 12 12.1
Vulkan 1.4 1.4
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
OpenCL 2.1 3.0
CUDA No -
Ray Tracing Yes Yes
DLSS No No
DisplayPort 2.1 2.1

Cast your vote

Choose between two graphics cards
1 (50%)
1 (50%)
Total votes: 2

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!