AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

We compared two discrete desktop gaming GPUs: the Radeon RX 5600 XT with 2304 shaders against the 11 months older GeForce GTX 1660 Ti that utilizes 24 pipelines and 1536 shaders. Here you will find complete details about specs, efficiency, performance tests, and more.

Review

General comparison of performance in games, applications, power efficiency, and other metrics
Gaming
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan games
Workstation
Perf. in 3D modeling, video editing and rendering apps
AI/ML
Capabilities for machine learning and AI-related tasks
Energy Efficiency
Power consumption efficiency in different scenarios
NanoReview Final Score
Overall video card score

Value for money (Beta)

We use average GPU prices from all manufacturers by default. Enter the current price of a specific card for better accuracy.
Currency
6 GB GDDR6
VS
6 GB GDDR6
13.0
(Bad)
Value Index
25.7
(Mediocre)

Key differences

Key distinctions and advantages of GTX 1660 Ti over RX 5600 XT
Reasons to consider the Radeon RX 5600 XT
  • Performs slightly better (up to 18%) in 3DMark Steel Nomad Lite
  • Manufactured using a more efficient 7 nm process technology
  • 33% higher maximum theoretical performance (7.2 vs 5.4 TFLOPS)
  • Shows 12% higher average frame rate in modern games at QHD resolution – 46 vs 41 FPS
  • Has 50% more shading units (2304 vs 1536)

Gaming Performance

Frame rate comparison across popular AAA titles at different resolutions

Games

FPS Table
Forza Horizon 5
110
61
48
28
89
51
44
24
The Witcher 3
94
75
48
28
88
70
46
24
Counter-Strike 2
154
108
75
36
140
95
71
30
Far Cry 6
89
76
54
29
73
63
49
22
Hogwarts Legacy
56
44
34
15
49
40
26
15
CoD: Modern Warfare III
72
67
43
28
58
47
35
24
Ghost of Tsushima
60
48
32
15
45
35
24
14
Cyberpunk 2077
57
49
25
12
46
41
25
10
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
101
88
56
31
78
75
50
25
Average FPS by Resolution
1080p High 88 74
1080p Ultra 68 57
1440p Ultra 46 41
4K Ultra 25 21
Margin of Error Low Low

Benchmarks

Graphics cards’ performance in recent benchmarking apps

3D Mark

Multiplatform graphics benchmark suite that directly correlates with performance in modern games
Steel Nomad Lite Score
RX 5600 XT +18%
6991
Time Spy 7631 6339
Solar Bay - 20515
Port Royal - 1649
Fire Strike 22323 16654
Wild Life Extreme 14672 13006
Night Raid 86634 76387
Sources: 3DMark [1], [2]

GeekBench 6 OpenCL

GPU test for computational tasks (image processing, photography, computer vision, and ML)
GB6 Compute Score
66629
72340
Background Blur 123.2 img/sec 124.8 img/sec
Face Detection 71.4 img/sec 69.4 img/sec
Horizon Detection 2.85 Gpixels/sec 2.67 Gpixels/sec
Edge Detection 4.1 Gpixels/sec 3.48 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian Blur 3.48 Gpixels/sec 3.52 Gpixels/sec
Feature Matching 0.62 Gpixels/sec 0.92 Gpixels/sec
Stereo Matching 253.9 Gpixels/sec 355.9 Gpixels/sec
Particle Physics 7670.6 FPS 9094.4 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]

Cinebench 2024 GPU

Hardware benchmark using Maxon's Cinema 4D rendering engine
Cinebench 2024 GPU
2988
3510

Passmark Graphics

Videocard test that focuses on compute shaders, multi-texturing, tessellation, and other features
G3D Mark Score
13384
12581
G2D Mark 871 769
DirectX 11 95 FPS 103 FPS
DirectX 12 52 FPS 51 FPS
GPU Compute 6184 Ops/s 5020 Ops/s
Sources: PassMark [5], [6] – 4842 & 14541 samples

Blender

Rendering performance test for 3D modeling
Blender GPU
618.03
792.56
Sources: Blender [9], [10] – 281 & 795 samples

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Radeon RX 5600 XT
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-04-11 (Flixsus)Geekbench 6 OpenCL70675
📘 2026-04-11 (Flixsus)Steel Nomad Light7074
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
No benchmark results yet

Artificial Intelligence Tests

Performance in machine learning and artificial intelligence tasks

GeekBench 6 ML

Tests throughput of AI operations in single, half, and quantized precision
GB6 ML Single Precision
RX 5600 XT +16%
12529
10788
GB6 ML Half Precision
RX 5600 XT +67%
14594
GB6 ML Quantized
RX 5600 XT +24%
9434
Image Classification (SP) 5459 4272
Image Segmentation (HP) 6448 6435
Image Super Resolution (Q) 15013 9635
Face Detection (HP) 17318 10867
Pose Estimation (Q) 62592 41061
Text Classification (SP) 1533 1737
Machine Translation (HP) 3771 3301
Object Detection (SP) 5601 5600
Depth Estimation (Q) 22988 18914
Style Transfer (SP) 120386 83427
Framework ONNX ONNX
Backend DirectML DirectML
Sources: Geekbench [9], [10]

Specifications

Technical specifications of Radeon RX 5600 XT and GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

General

Vendor Amd Nvidia
Build Discrete Discrete
Released January 21, 2020 February 22, 2019
Launch price (MSRP) $279 $279
Case Desktop Desktop
Purpose Gaming Gaming
Segment Mid-range Entry-level
Architecture RDNA 1.0 Turing
GPU Codename Navi 10 TU116
Rival Equivalent - GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER - Radeon RX 5600 XT
Successor - Radeon RX 9060 XT -
Recommended CPU - Intel Core i5 9500 or above - Intel Core i5 9500 or above
Desktop GPU rating (70th and 73rd place)

Graphics Processing Unit

Base Clock 1130 MHz 1500 MHz
Boost Clock 1560 MHz 1770 MHz
Shading Units 2304 1536
Texture Mapping Units (TMUs) 144 96
Render Output Units (ROPs) 64 48
Compute Units (Pipelines) - 24
Tensor Cores No No
Ray-tracing Cores No No
L1 Cache - 64KB per cluster
L2 Cache 3MB shared 1536KB shared
Instructions Per Cycle 2 IPC 2 IPC

Raw Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 100 GPixel/s 85 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate 225 GTexel/s 170 GTexel/s
FLOPS (FP32)
RX 5600 XT +33%
7.2 TFLOPS
5.4 TFLOPS

Physical

Interface PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
TGP 150 W 120 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Fabrication Process 7 nm 12 nm
Die Size 251 mm² 284 mm²
Transistor Count 10 billion 6 billion
Transistor Density 39.84 MTr/mm² 21.13 MTr/mm²

Memory

Memory Type GDDR6 GDDR6
Memory Size 6 GB 6 GB
Memory Clock 1500 MHz 1500 MHz
Effective Memory Speed 12000 Mbps 12000 Mbps
Bus 192-bit 192-bit
ECC No No
Memory Bandwidth
288 GB/s
288 GB/s

API

DirectX 12 12
Vulkan 1.3 1.3
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
OpenCL 2.1 3.0
CUDA - 7.5
Ray Tracing No No
DLSS No No
DisplayPort 1.4a 1.4a

Cast your vote

Choose between two graphics cards
20 (71.4%)
8 (28.6%)
Total votes: 28

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!