AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB

We compared two discrete desktop gaming GPUs: the Radeon RX 7600 XT with 2048 shaders against the 6 months older GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB that utilizes 34 pipelines and 4352 shaders. Here you will find complete details about specs, efficiency, performance tests, and more.

Review

General comparison of performance in games, applications, power efficiency, and other metrics
Gaming
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan games
Workstation
Perf. in 3D modeling, video editing and rendering apps
AI/ML
Capabilities for machine learning and AI-related tasks
Energy Efficiency
Power consumption efficiency in different scenarios
NanoReview Final Score
Overall video card score
Scores marked with a red asterisk (**) represent initial estimates from early testing.

Value for money (Beta)

We use average GPU prices from all manufacturers by default. Enter the current price of a specific card for better accuracy.
Currency
16 GB GDDR6
VS
16 GB GDDR6
38.5
(Mediocre)
Value Index
30.4
(Mediocre)

Key differences

Key distinctions and advantages of RTX 4060 Ti 16GB over RX 7600 XT
Reasons to consider the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
  • Performs better (up to 32%) in 3DMark Steel Nomad Lite
  • Shows 26% higher average frame rate in modern games at QHD resolution – 86 vs 68 FPS
  • Manufactured using a more efficient 5 nm process technology
  • Supports Nvidia DLSS 3 technology
  • Achieves 56% more points in the GeekBench 6 Compute test (135K vs 86K)
  • Has 2.1x more shading units (4352 vs 2048)

Gaming Performance

Frame rate comparison across popular AAA titles at different resolutions

Games

FPS Table
Forza Horizon 5
141
81
67
46
144
94
83
62
The Witcher 3
131
109
78
42
172
141
99
53
Counter-Strike 2
206
140
103
52
245
190
132
76
Far Cry 6
111
97
73
43
129
117
92
56
Hogwarts Legacy
77
67
45
23
95
81
62
32
CoD: Modern Warfare III
107
98
68
41
118
112
81
52
Ghost of Tsushima
82
69
47
29
88
75
57
31
Cyberpunk 2077
83
70
45
19
105
92
56
26
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
140
120
84
42
161
147
111
59
Average FPS by Resolution
1080p High 120 140
1080p Ultra 95 117
1440p Ultra 68 86
4K Ultra 37 50
Margin of Error Low Low

Benchmarks

Graphics cards’ performance in recent benchmarking apps

3D Mark

Multiplatform graphics benchmark suite that directly correlates with performance in modern games
Steel Nomad Lite Score
10250
13566
Time Spy 11136 13456
Solar Bay 44475 62446
Port Royal 5890 8119
Fire Strike 31732 34258
Wild Life Extreme 20437 25587
Night Raid 122566 135657
Sources: 3DMark [1], [2]

GeekBench 6 OpenCL

GPU test for computational tasks (image processing, photography, computer vision, and ML)
GB6 Compute Score
86899
135837
Background Blur 199.6 img/sec 232.6 img/sec
Face Detection 106.8 img/sec 138.4 img/sec
Horizon Detection 3.23 Gpixels/sec 4.68 Gpixels/sec
Edge Detection 4.3 Gpixels/sec 6.06 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian Blur 3.92 Gpixels/sec 6.99 Gpixels/sec
Feature Matching 1 Gpixels/sec 1.6 Gpixels/sec
Stereo Matching 292.4 Gpixels/sec 652.6 Gpixels/sec
Particle Physics 10709.1 FPS 19534.7 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]

Cinebench 2024 GPU

Hardware benchmark using Maxon's Cinema 4D rendering engine
Cinebench 2024 GPU
5589
15700

Passmark Graphics

Videocard test that focuses on compute shaders, multi-texturing, tessellation, and other features
G3D Mark Score
17344
22551
G2D Mark 1026 1078
DirectX 11 167 FPS 199 FPS
DirectX 12 67 FPS 89 FPS
GPU Compute 8965 Ops/s 11953 Ops/s
Sources: PassMark [5], [6] – 2277 & 2402 samples

Blender

Rendering performance test for 3D modeling
Blender GPU
1270.34
3832.52
Sources: Blender [9], [10] – 160 & 2727 samples

Artificial Intelligence Tests

Performance in machine learning and artificial intelligence tasks

GeekBench 6 ML

Tests throughput of AI operations in single, half, and quantized precision
GB6 ML Single Precision
GB6 ML Half Precision
GB6 ML Quantized
Image Classification (SP) 9915 -
Image Segmentation (HP) 10595 -
Image Super Resolution (Q) 25345 -
Face Detection (HP) 33847 -
Pose Estimation (Q) 92252 -
Text Classification (SP) 3842 -
Machine Translation (HP) 4096 -
Object Detection (SP) 7170 -
Depth Estimation (Q) 43860 -
Style Transfer (SP) 185627 -
Framework ONNX -
Backend DirectML -
Sources: Geekbench [9]

Specifications

Technical specifications of Radeon RX 7600 XT and GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB

General

Vendor Amd Nvidia
Build Discrete Discrete
Released January 24, 2024 July 18, 2023
Launch price (MSRP) $329 $499
Case Desktop Desktop
Purpose Gaming Gaming
Segment Mid-range Mid-range
Architecture RDNA 3.0 Ada Lovelace
GPU Codename Navi 33 AD106
Rival Equivalent - GeForce RTX 4060 -
Successor - Radeon RX 9060 XT - GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (16GB)
Recommended CPU - Intel Core i5 13600K or above - Intel Core i5 14600K or above
Desktop GPU rating (53rd and 40th place)

Graphics Processing Unit

Base Clock 1980 MHz 2310 MHz
Boost Clock 2755 MHz 2535 MHz
Shading Units 2048 4352
Texture Mapping Units (TMUs) 128 136
Render Output Units (ROPs) 64 48
Compute Units (Pipelines) - 34
Tensor Cores - 136
Ray-tracing Cores 32 34
L1 Cache 128KB per cluster 128KB per cluster
L2 Cache 2MB shared 32MB shared
Instructions Per Cycle 4 IPC 2 IPC

Raw Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 176 GPixel/s 122 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate 353 GTexel/s 345 GTexel/s
FLOPS (FP32)
22.6 TFLOPS
22.1 TFLOPS
Differences in GPUs' instructions per clock make TFLOPS values not directly comparable.

Physical

Interface PCIe 4.0 x8 PCIe 4.0 x8
TGP 190 W 165 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Fabrication Process 6 nm 5 nm
Die Size 204 mm² 188 mm²
Transistor Count 13 billion 22 billion
Transistor Density 63.73 MTr/mm² 117.02 MTr/mm²

Memory

Memory Type GDDR6 GDDR6
Memory Size 16 GB 16 GB
Memory Clock 2250 MHz 2250 MHz
Effective Memory Speed 18000 Mbps 18000 Mbps
Bus 128-bit 128-bit
ECC No No
Memory Bandwidth
288 GB/s
288 GB/s

API

DirectX 12 12
Vulkan 1.3 1.3
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
OpenCL 2.2 3.0
CUDA - 8.9
Ray Tracing Yes Yes
DLSS No DLSS 3
DisplayPort 2.1 1.4a

Cast your vote

Choose between two graphics cards
45 (67.2%)
22 (32.8%)
Total votes: 67

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!