AMD Radeon RX 9070 vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8GB

We compared two discrete desktop gaming GPUs: the Radeon RX 9070 16 GB with 56 pipelines and 3584 shaders against the 1 year and 8 months older GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8GB 8 GB that utilizes 34 pipelines and 4352 shaders. Here you will find complete details about specs, efficiency, performance tests, and more.

Review

General comparison of performance in games, applications, power efficiency, and other metrics
Gaming
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan games
Workstation
Perf. in 3D modeling, video editing and rendering apps
AI/ML
Capabilities for machine learning and AI-related tasks
Energy Efficiency
Power consumption efficiency in different scenarios
NanoReview Final Score
Overall video card score

Value for money (Beta)

We use average GPU prices from all manufacturers by default. Enter the current price of a specific card for better accuracy.
Currency
16 GB GDDR6
VS
8 GB GDDR6
94.9
(Very good)
Value Index
45.1
(Average)

Key differences

Key distinctions and advantages of RTX 4060 Ti 8GB over RX 9070
Reasons to consider the Radeon RX 9070
  • Performs significantly better (up to 68%) in 3DMark Steel Nomad Lite
  • Shows 62% higher average frame rate in modern games at QHD resolution – 139 vs 86 FPS
  • 63% higher maximum theoretical performance (36.1 vs 22.1 TFLOPS)
  • Manufactured using a more efficient 4 nm process technology
  • Includes 8 GB more video memory
  • Has 2.2x higher memory bandwidth: 644.6 vs 288 GB/s
Reasons to consider the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8GB
  • Supports Nvidia DLSS 3 technology

Gaming Performance

Frame rate comparison across popular AAA titles at different resolutions

Games

FPS Table
Forza Horizon 5
229
156
137
102
150
97
84
61
The Witcher 3
240
216
159
84
167
137
98
52
Counter-Strike 2
307
215
158
84
239
187
136
76
Far Cry 6
192
163
148
95
129
119
95
54
Hogwarts Legacy
146
119
97
52
97
80
59
34
CoD: Modern Warfare III
219
212
157
107
121
112
80
53
Ghost of Tsushima
146
122
105
65
86
74
56
33
Cyberpunk 2077
174
149
102
47
102
91
57
26
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
262
248
188
99
164
146
109
58
Average FPS by Resolution
1080p High 213 139
1080p Ultra 178 116
1440p Ultra 139 86
4K Ultra 82 50
Margin of Error Low Low

Benchmarks

Graphics cards’ performance in recent benchmarking apps

3D Mark

Multiplatform graphics benchmark suite that directly correlates with performance in modern games
Steel Nomad Lite Score
RX 9070 +68%
22841
Time Spy 26693 13479
Solar Bay 106118 62428
Port Royal 15939 8103
Fire Strike 60053 34401
Wild Life Extreme 48323 25599
Night Raid 177554 136255
Sources: 3DMark [1], [2]

GeekBench 6 OpenCL

GPU test for computational tasks (image processing, photography, computer vision, and ML)
GB6 Compute Score
RX 9070 +17%
149949
Background Blur 377.5 img/sec 198.3 img/sec
Face Detection 221.3 img/sec 126.2 img/sec
Horizon Detection 6.4 Gpixels/sec 4.35 Gpixels/sec
Edge Detection 8.99 Gpixels/sec 5.69 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian Blur 8.52 Gpixels/sec 6.72 Gpixels/sec
Feature Matching 1.36 Gpixels/sec 1.53 Gpixels/sec
Stereo Matching 606 Gpixels/sec 656.3 Gpixels/sec
Particle Physics 8521.2 FPS 19149.2 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]

Cinebench 2024 GPU

Hardware benchmark using Maxon's Cinema 4D rendering engine
Cinebench 2024 GPU

Passmark Graphics

Videocard test that focuses on compute shaders, multi-texturing, tessellation, and other features
G3D Mark Score
RX 9070 +12%
25366
G2D Mark 1262 1094
DirectX 11 280 FPS 202 FPS
DirectX 12 73 FPS 85 FPS
GPU Compute 14799 Ops/s 12003 Ops/s
Sources: PassMark [5], [6] – 3038 & 15714 samples

Blender

Rendering performance test for 3D modeling
Blender GPU
2776.63
Sources: Blender [9] – 218 samples

Artificial Intelligence Tests

Performance in machine learning and artificial intelligence tasks

GeekBench 6 ML

Tests throughput of AI operations in single, half, and quantized precision
GB6 ML Single Precision
RX 9070 +68%
37056
GB6 ML Half Precision
RX 9070 +51%
54866
GB6 ML Quantized
RX 9070 +73%
29946
Image Classification (SP) 15375 9359
Image Segmentation (HP) 37834 21463
Image Super Resolution (Q) 43910 26023
Face Detection (HP) 67858 42533
Pose Estimation (Q) 172939 99698
Text Classification (SP) 4469 3181
Machine Translation (HP) 8499 4956
Object Detection (SP) 15393 11009
Depth Estimation (Q) 66890 43518
Style Transfer (SP) 365633 203667
Framework ONNX ONNX
Backend DirectML DirectML
Sources: Geekbench [9], [10]

Specifications

Technical specifications of Radeon RX 9070 and GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8GB

General

Vendor Amd Nvidia
Build Discrete Discrete
Released January 7, 2025 May 18, 2023
Launch price (MSRP) $549 $399
Case Desktop Desktop
Purpose Gaming Gaming
Segment High-end Mid-range
Architecture RDNA 4.0 Ada Lovelace
GPU Codename Navi 48 AD106
Rival Equivalent - GeForce RTX 5070 - Radeon RX 7700 XT
Successor - - GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (8GB)
Recommended CPU - Intel Core Ultra 5 245K or above - Intel Core i5 14600K or above
Desktop GPU rating (16th and 43rd place)

Graphics Processing Unit

Base Clock 1330 MHz 2310 MHz
Boost Clock 2520 MHz 2535 MHz
Shading Units 3584 4352
Texture Mapping Units (TMUs) 224 136
Render Output Units (ROPs) 128 48
Compute Units (Pipelines) 56 34
Tensor Cores 112 136
Ray-tracing Cores 56 34
L1 Cache 128KB per cluster 128KB per cluster
L2 Cache 8MB shared 32MB shared
Instructions Per Cycle 4 IPC 2 IPC

Raw Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 323 GPixel/s 122 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate 564 GTexel/s 345 GTexel/s
FLOPS (FP32)
RX 9070 +63%
36.1 TFLOPS
22.1 TFLOPS
Differences in GPUs' instructions per clock make TFLOPS values not directly comparable.

Physical

Interface PCIe 5.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x8
TGP 220 W 160 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Fabrication Process 4 nm 5 nm
Die Size 357 mm² 188 mm²
Transistor Count 53.9 billion 22 billion
Transistor Density 150.98 MTr/mm² 117.02 MTr/mm²

Memory

Memory Type GDDR6 GDDR6
Memory Size 16 GB 8 GB
Memory Clock 2518 MHz 2250 MHz
Effective Memory Speed 20100 Mbps 18000 Mbps
Bus 256-bit 128-bit
ECC No No
Memory Bandwidth
RX 9070 +124%
644.6 GB/s
288 GB/s

API

DirectX 12.2 12
Vulkan 1.4 1.3
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
OpenCL 2.2 3.0
CUDA No 8.9
Ray Tracing Yes Yes
DLSS No DLSS 3
DisplayPort 2.1a 1.4a

Cast your vote

Choose between two graphics cards
10 (71.4%)
4 (28.6%)
Total votes: 14

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!