Asus Vivobook Pro 15 OLED (Q533/N6506) vs TUF Gaming F15 (2023)

Please select specific configurations for the laptops to get a more accurate comparative review
Display
CPU
GPU
RAM
Storage

Review

Evaluation of Asus Vivobook Pro 15 OLED (Q533/N6506) and TUF Gaming F15 (2023) important characteristics
Performance
System and application performance
Gaming
Performance in popular 3D games
Display
Viewing angle, color accuracy, brightness
Battery Life
Potential battery life in light and average use
Connectivity
Ports, webcam and other interfaces
Portability
Design, materials, durability and usability
Pick the usage scenario that best matches your needs
Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

Please input up-to-date prices for the selected laptop configurations to get an accurate value-for-money index.
Currency
VS
43.2
(Average)
Value Index
56.7
(Average)

Key Differences

What are the key differences between the notebooks
Advantages of the Asus Vivobook Pro 15 OLED (Q533/N6506)
  • Significantly easier to carry: weighs 400 grams less (around 0.88 lbs)
  • Thinner bezels and 6% higher screen-to-body ratio
  • Better webcam recording quality
  • Provides 100% higher max. screen brightness: 600 vs 300 nits
Advantages of the Asus TUF Gaming F15 (2023)
  • Higher screen refresh rate: 144 versus 60 Hz
  • Can run popular games at about 117-159% higher FPS
  • Performs significantly better (up to 2.6x) in 3DMark Steel Nomad Lite
  • Around 16% better multi-core CPU performance in the Cinebench 2024 test
  • Features a bigger (~20%) battery – 90 against 75 watt-hours

Tests and Specifications

Comparison table of test results and technical specs

Case

Weight 1.8 kg (3.97 lbs) 2.2 kg (4.85 lbs)
Dimensions 355.7 x 235.3 x 19.9 mm
14 x 9.26 x 0.78 inches
354 x 251 x 22.4-24.9 mm
13.94 x 9.88 x 0.88-0.98 inches
Area 837 cm2 (129.6 inches2) 889 cm2 (137.7 inches2)
Screen-to-body ratio ~80.2% ~75.5%
Side bezels 5.2 mm 4.3 mm
Colors Silver, Gray Gray
Material Top: Aluminum
Middle: Plastic
Bottom: Plastic
Top: Aluminum
Middle: Plastic
Bottom: Plastic
Transformer No No
Opening angle 180° 145°
Size comparison
Cooling solution
Cooling system Active Active
Vapor chamber No No
Liquid metal No No
Number of fans 2 2
Noise level (max. load) 58.5 dB -

Display

Size 15.6 inches 15.6 inches
Type OLED IPS LCD
Refresh rate 60 Hz 144 Hz
PPI 141 ppi 141 ppi
Aspect ratio 16:9 16:9
Resolution 1920 x 1080 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels
HDR support Yes, Dolby Vision No
Sync technology No G-Sync
Touchscreen No No
Coating Glossy (Antireflective) Matte
Ambient light sensor - No
Display tests
Contrast 1000000:1 960:1
sRGB color space 100% 100%
Adobe RGB profile 97% 75.3%
DCI-P3 color gamut 100% -
Response time 1 ms 7 ms
Max. brightness

Battery

Capacity
Full charging time - 1:30 hr
Battery type Li-Ion Li-Ion
Replaceable No No
Fast charging Yes Yes
Charging via USB (Power Delivery) Yes Yes
Charging port position Right Left
Charge power 200 W 200 / 240 W
Weight of AC adapter 571 grams 655 grams

CPU

CPU name
Base frequency 1.4 GHz 2.3 GHz
Turbo frequency 4.8 GHz 4.7 GHz
Cores 16 (6P + 10E) 14 (6P + 8E)
Threads 22 20
L3 Cache 24 MB 24 MB
Integrated GPU Arc Graphics (8-Cores) Intel Iris Xe Graphics (96EU)
Fabrication process 7 nm 10 nm

Benchmarks

Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench 2024 (Single-Core)
Cinebench 2024 (Multi-Core)

Graphics Card

GPU name
TGP - 140 W
Nvidia Optimus MUX MUX
Type Dedicated Dedicated
Fabrication process 8 nm 5 nm
GPU base clock - 2070 MHz
GPU boost clock - 2370 MHz
FLOPS 4.3-7.1 TFLOPS 13.4 TFLOPS
Memory size 6 GB 6 GB
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR6
Memory bus 128 bit 96 bit
Memory speed ~12 Gbps ~16 Gbps
Shading units (cores) 2048 2560
Texture mapping units (TMUs) 64 80
Raster operations pipelines (ROPs) 40 32
GPU performance 4.3-7.1 TFLOPS 13.4 TFLOPS

GPU Benchmarks

Steel Nomad Lite Score
Blender GPU 810 2730
Solar Bay 15241 36504
Expected FPS based on average performance across 9 popular games. Details

RAM

RAM size
Channels 1x8 GB 2x4 GB
Clock 5600 MHz 4800 MHz
Type DDR5 DDR5
Upgradable Yes Yes
Total slots 1 2
Max. ram size 24 GB 32 GB

Storage

Storage size
Bus PCI-E Gen 4.0 (4x) PCI-E Gen 4.0 (4x)
Storage type SSD (M2) SSD (M2)
Channels 1x512 GB 1x512 GB
Upgradable Yes Yes
Total slots 2 2
NVMe Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers 2.0 2.0
Power 2x2W -
Dolby Atmos Yes Yes
Loudness ~84 dB -
Microphones 2 2

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard v6E v6
Bluetooth v5.3 v5.2
Fingerprint No No
Infrared sensor Yes No
Optical drive No No
Webcam Above the display Above the display
Webcam resolution 2560 x 1440 1280 x 720
Ports
USB-A 2x USB 3.2 2x USB 3.2
USB Type-C 2x USB 3.2 2x USB 4.0
Thunderbolt Thunderbolt 4 Thunderbolt 4
HDMI 1x HDMI 2.1 1x HDMI 2.1
DisplayPort No No
VGA No No
Audio jack (3.5 mm) Yes Yes
Ethernet (RJ45) Yes Yes
SD card reader Yes No
Proprietary charging port Yes Yes

Input

Keyboard
Keyboard type Island Island
Numpad Yes Yes
Backlight Yes Yes
Key travel 1.4 mm 1.7 mm
Touchpad
Surface Plastic Plastic
Windows Precision Yes Yes
*Disclaimer! Ports, speakers, display, and other specifications can vary depending on the laptop's specific configuration or region.

Cast your vote

So, which laptop would you choose?
8 (50%)
8 (50%)
Total votes: 16

Comments

Write your opinion about the comparison of Asus TUF Gaming F15 (2023) and Vivobook Pro 15 OLED (Q533/N6506) or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!