HP Omen Transcend 14 vs Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401

Please select specific configurations for the laptops to get a more accurate comparative review
CPU
GPU
RAM
Storage

Review

Evaluation of HP Omen Transcend 14 and Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401 important characteristics
Performance
System and application performance
Gaming
Performance in popular 3D games
Display
Viewing angle, color accuracy, brightness
Battery Life
Potential battery life in light and average use
Connectivity
Ports, webcam and other interfaces
Portability
Design, materials, durability and usability
NanoReview Score
Pick the usage scenario that best matches your needs
Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

Please input up-to-date prices for the selected laptop configurations to get an accurate value-for-money index.
Currency
VS
35.3
(Mediocre)
Value Index
38.2
(Mediocre)

Key Differences

What are the key differences between the notebooks
Advantages of the HP Omen Transcend 14
  • Can run popular games at about 9-13% higher FPS
  • Around 9% better multi-core CPU performance in the Cinebench 2024 test
  • Performs slightly better (up to 13%) in 3DMark Steel Nomad Lite
  • Provides 25% higher max. screen brightness: 500 vs 400 nits
Advantages of the Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401
  • Higher screen refresh rate: 165 versus 120 Hz
  • Slightly easier to carry: weighs 170 grams less (around 0.37 lbs)
  • Thinner bezels and 3% higher screen-to-body ratio

Tests and Specifications

Comparison table of test results and technical specs

Case

Weight 1.63 kg (3.59 lbs) 1.46 kg (3.22 lbs)
Dimensions 313 x 233.5 x 16.9 mm
12.32 x 9.19 x 0.67 inches
311 x 227 x 16.9-19.9 mm
12.24 x 8.94 x 0.67-0.78 inches
Area 731 cm2 (113.2 inches2) 706 cm2 (109.4 inches2)
Screen-to-body ratio ~77.8% ~80.5%
Side bezels 5.8 mm 4.8 mm
Colors White, Black Gray
Material Aluminum Top: Aluminum
Middle: Plastic
Bottom: Plastic
Transformer No No
Opening angle 135° -
Size comparison
Cooling solution
Cooling system Active Active
Vapor chamber No No
Liquid metal No No
Number of fans 2 2
Max. fan speed (RPM) 4900 RPM -
Noise level (max. load) 51.9 dB -

Display

Size 14 inches 14 inches
Type OLED IPS LCD
Refresh rate 120 Hz 165 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate - No
PPI 243 ppi 216 ppi
Aspect ratio 16:10 16:10
Resolution 2880 x 1800 pixels 2560 x 1600 pixels
HDR support Yes, HDR10 No
Sync technology No G-Sync
Touchscreen No No
Coating Glossy Matte
Ambient light sensor No No
Display tests
Contrast 1000000:1 -
sRGB color space 100% 100%
Adobe RGB profile 96.1% -
DCI-P3 color gamut 100% -
Response time 1 ms 3 ms
Max. brightness
500 nits

Battery

Capacity
Full charging time 1:30 hr -
Battery type Li-Po Li-Ion
Replaceable No No
Fast charging Yes Yes
Charging via USB (Power Delivery) Yes, 140 W Yes, 100 W
Charging port position Left, Bottom Left
Charge power 140 W 100 / 200 W
Weight of AC adapter 506 grams -

CPU

CPU name
Base frequency 1.4 GHz 3.8 GHz
Turbo frequency 4.8 GHz 5.1 GHz
Cores 16 (6P + 10E) 8
Threads 22 16
L3 Cache 24 MB 16 MB
Integrated GPU Arc Graphics (8-Cores) Radeon 780M
Fabrication process 7 nm 4 nm

Benchmarks

Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench 2024 (Single-Core)
Cinebench 2024 (Multi-Core)

Graphics Card

GPU name
TGP 65 W -
Nvidia Optimus Yes, Advanced Optimus MUX
Type Dedicated Dedicated
Fabrication process 5 nm 5 nm
FLOPS 9.6 TFLOPS 8.2-12.1 TFLOPS
Memory size 6 GB 6 GB
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR6
Memory bus 96 bit 96 bit
Memory speed ~16 Gbps ~16 Gbps
Shading units (cores) 2560 2560
Texture mapping units (TMUs) 80 80
Raster operations pipelines (ROPs) 32 32
GPU performance 9.6 TFLOPS 8.2-12.1 TFLOPS

GPU Benchmarks

Steel Nomad Lite Score
Blender GPU 2149 1827
Solar Bay 27641 26490
Expected FPS based on average performance across 9 popular games. Details

RAM

RAM size
Channels 2x8 GB 2x4 GB
Clock 7467 MHz 8533 MHz
Type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Upgradable No No

Storage

Storage size
Bus PCI-E Gen 4.0 (4x) PCI-E Gen 4.0 (4x)
Storage type SSD (M2) SSD (M2)
Channels 1x512 GB 1x512 GB
Upgradable Yes Yes
Total slots 1 2
NVMe Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers 2.0 2.0
Power 2x2W 2x2W
Dolby Atmos No Yes
Loudness ~80.6 dB -
Microphones 2 2

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard v7 v6E
Bluetooth v5.4 v5.4
Fingerprint No No
Infrared sensor Yes Yes
Optical drive No No
Webcam Above the display Above the display
Webcam resolution 1920 x 1080 1920 x 1080
Ports
USB-A 2x USB 3.2 2x USB 3.2
USB Type-C 2x USB 4.0 2x USB 4.0
Thunderbolt Thunderbolt 4 No
HDMI 1x HDMI 2.1 1x HDMI 2.1
DisplayPort No No
VGA No No
Audio jack (3.5 mm) Yes Yes
Ethernet (RJ45) No No
SD card reader No Yes
Proprietary charging port No Yes

Input

Keyboard
Keyboard type Monolith Island
Numpad No No
Backlight Yes Yes
Key travel 1.5 mm 1.7 mm
Touchpad
Size 12.5 x 8.0 cm -
Surface Plastic Glass
Windows Precision Yes Yes
Further details
Notes on Omen Transcend 14:
    - Discrete GPU output is available only via HDMI, despite both HDMI and Thunderbolt 4 ports being present.
    - It supports dual-sided SSDs with capacity up to 4 TB.
Notes on TUF Gaming A14 FA401:
    - The second SSD slot is limited to PCIe Gen 4x2.
*Disclaimer! Ports, speakers, display, and other specifications can vary depending on the laptop's specific configuration or region.

Cast your vote

So, which laptop would you choose?
13 (25%)
39 (75%)
Total votes: 52

Comments

Write your opinion about the comparison of Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401 and HP Omen Transcend 14 or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Joanna October 16, 2024 at 03:27 PM
thank you for this comparison, it really helped me to make a decision ;)
+6 Reply