Nothing Phone (2) vs Honor 200 Pro
Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.7-inch Nothing Phone (2) (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1) that was released on July 11, 2023, against the Honor 200 Pro, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 and came out 11 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Nothing Phone (2)
- Shows 12% longer battery life (23:16 vs 20:51 hours)
Reasons to consider the Honor 200 Pro
- The rear camera has a 2.5x optical zoom
- Has 50% more RAM: 12GB versus 8GB
- Water-resistant body (IP65 classification)
- Supports higher wattage charging (100W versus 45W)
- 18% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (1698K versus 1436K)
- Delivers 12% higher peak brightness (1108 against 992 nits)
- 11% higher pixel density (437 vs 394 PPI)
- The phone is 11 months newer
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | OLED |
| Size | 6.7 inches | 6.78 inches |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels | 1224 x 2700 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 19.85:9 |
| PPI | 394 ppi | 437 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (10-120 Hz) | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max rated brightness | 600 nits | 1200 nits |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | 1600 nits | 4000 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, HDR10+ | Yes, HDR10+ |
| Touch sampling rate | 360 Hz | - |
| Screen protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Aluminosilicate glass |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 87.5% | 90.8% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
| RGB color space | 98.3% | 99.8% |
| PWM | 90 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Response time | 1 ms | 2 ms |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinity | ∞ Infinity |
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 162.1 mm (6.38 inches) | 163.3 mm (6.43 inches) |
| Width | 76.4 mm (3.01 inches) | 75.2 mm (2.96 inches) |
| Thickness | 8.6 mm (0.34 inches) | 8.2 mm (0.32 inches) |
| Weight | 201.2 g (7.1 oz) | 199 g (7.02 oz) |
| Waterproof | IP54 | IP65 |
| Advanced cooling | Vapor chamber | Vapor chamber |
| Rear material | Glass | Glass |
| Frame material | Metal | Plastic |
| Colors | White, Gray | White, Black, Blue, Pink |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-display | Yes, in-display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 |
| Max clock | 3200 MHz | 3000 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (1 + 4 + 3) |
| Architecture | - 4 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A510 - 3 cores at 2.75 GHz: Cortex-A710 - 1 core at 3.2 GHz: Cortex-X2 |
- 3 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A520 - 4 cores at 2.8 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 1 core at 3 GHz: Cortex-X4 |
| L3 cache | 6 MB | 8 MB |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 4 nanometers | 4 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Hexagon | Hexagon |
| Graphics | Adreno 730 | Adreno 735 |
| GPU shading units | 1024 | 768 |
| GPU clock | 900 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~1843.2 GFLOPS | ~1689.6 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 5931 | 8821 |
| Single-core score | 1729 | 1820 |
| Multi-core score | 4563 | 4579 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 545410 | 516831 |
| GPU | 241847 | 495795 |
| Memory | 249651 | 270542 |
| UX | 399726 | 414892 |
| Total score | 1436634 | 1698060 |
| Samples | [7 tests] | [16 tests] |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | 76% | 60% |
| Graphics test | 6 FPS | 7 FPS |
| Graphics score | 823 | 998 |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Graphics test | - | 17 FPS |
| Section 1 | - | 19 FPS |
| Section 2 | - | 17 FPS |
| Section 3 | - | 14 FPS |
| Graphics score | - | 4494 |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | - | 15496 |
| Video editing | - | 7821 |
| Photo editing | - | 29476 |
| Data manipulation | - | 12021 |
| Writing score | - | 16099 |
Recent User Tests
Nothing Phone (2)
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-10-24 (Nothing) | AnTuTu 12 | 1364146 |
| 📘 2026-10-21 (T0rt1lla) | AnTuTu 12 | 1572879 |
| 📘 2026-10-15 (Hekoow) | AnTuTu 11 | 1406051 |
| 📘 2026-06-11 (Ramalama) | AnTuTu 11 | 1375740 |
| 📘 2026-03-26 (meqvice) | AnTuTu 11 | 1395466 |
Honor 200 Pro
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-09-08 (ChenTH) | AnTuTu 11 | 1573533 |
| 📘 2026-06-07 (Dimik) | AnTuTu 11 | 1768071 |
| 📘 2026-05-26 (Jason) | AnTuTu 11 | 1633389 |
| 📘 2026-04-25 (Олег) | AnTuTu 11 | 1801694 |
| 📘 2026-03-29 (Fenrir) | AnTuTu 11 | 1421683 |
Memory
| RAM size | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5X |
| Memory clock | 3200 MHz | - |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage size | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 13 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) | Android 14 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) |
| ROM | Nothing OS 4.0 | MagicOS 10 |
| OS size | 28 GB | 55 GB |
| OS updates | - | 4 years |
| Security updates | - | 5 years |
Battery
| Capacity | 4700 mAh | 5200 mAh |
| Max charge power | 45 W | 100 W |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | Yes (15 W) | Yes (66 W) |
| Reverse charging | Yes, (wireless) | Yes, (wireless) |
| Bypass charging | - | No |
| Fast charging | Yes (62% in 30 min) | Yes (75% in 30 min) |
| Full charging time | 1:04 hr | 0:45 hr |
| Web browsing | 10:12 hr | 10:55 hr |
| Watching video | 16:37 hr | 08:13 hr |
| Gaming | 06:07 hr | 05:51 hr |
| Standby | 91 hr | 99 hr |
General battery life
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8192 x 6144 | 8192 x 6144 |
| Zoom | Digital | Optical, 2.5x |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Slow motion | 240 FPS (1080p) | - |
| Angle of widest lens | 114° | 112° |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Ultrawide: 50 MP |
1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 50 MP 3) Ultrawide: 12 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
- Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.9 |
| Focal length | 24 mm | - |
| Sensor | Sony IMX890 | OmniVision OV50H |
| Sensor size | 1/1.56" (≈ 0.64 inch) | 1/1.3" (≈ 0.77 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1 micron | 1.2 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | - | 50 MP |
| Aperture | - | f/2.4 |
| Focal length | - | 68 mm |
| Sensor | - | Sony IMX856 |
| Stabilization | - | Optical |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 12 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | - | 16 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KJN1 | - |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 0.64 micron | - |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
DxOMark main camera tests
Photo quality
Video quality
Generic main camera score
| Bokeh | - | 70 |
| Preview | - | 69 |
| Zoom | - | 132 |
| Samples | Photo samples of Nothing Phone (2) from DxOMark | Photo samples of Honor 200 Pro from DxOMark |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 32 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 6528 x 4896 | 8192 x 6144 |
| Aperture | f/2.5 | f/2.1 |
| Focal length | - | 21 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX615 | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.74" (≈ 0.36 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 0.8 micron | - |
| Autofocus | No | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 60 FPS | 2160p (4K) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | - | No |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared port | No | Yes |
| Number of SIM* | 2 | 2 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
| eSIM support* | No | Yes |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| LTE Cat* | 20 | 20 |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | July 2023 | May 2024 |
| Release date | July 2023 | May 2024 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $599 | $699 |
| Successor | - Nothing Phone (3) | - Honor 600 Pro |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Not included | Yes, 100 W |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
These smartphones have a lot in common, but we would recommend the Honor 200 Pro. It has a better display, camera, performance, gaming, software, design, and sound.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 16
Related comparisons
7.
Honor 200 Pro vs Honor 200 (2)