Oppo Find X5 vs X3 Pro
Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.55-inch Oppo Find X5 (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 888) that was released on February 24, 2022, against the Oppo Find X3 Pro, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G and came out 1 year before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Oppo Find X5
- Shows 17% longer battery life (19:56 vs 16:59 hours)
- Slow-motion recording at 480FPS
- Supports higher wattage charging (80W versus 65W)
- The phone is 1 year newer
- 18% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 1488 and 1263 points
- Ready for eSIM technology
Reasons to consider the Oppo Find X3 Pro
- Better camera quality (According to DxOMark rating)
- 31% higher pixel density (525 vs 402 PPI)
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.55 inches | 6.7 inches |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels | 1440 x 3216 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| PPI | 402 ppi | 525 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | Yes |
| Max rated brightness | 500 nits | 500 nits |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | 1000 nits | 1300 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, HDR10+ | Yes, HDR10+ |
| Touch sampling rate | 240 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Screen protection | Gorilla Glass Victus | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89% | 89.5% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
| RGB color space | - | 98.4% |
| PWM | - | 362 Hz |
| Response time | - | 4.8 ms |
| Contrast | - | β Infinity |
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 160.3 mm (6.31 inches) | 163.6 mm (6.44 inches) |
| Width | 72.6 mm (2.86 inches) | 74 mm (2.91 inches) |
| Thickness | 8.7 mm (0.34 inches) | 8.3 mm (0.33 inches) |
| Weight | 196 g (6.91 oz) | 193 g (6.81 oz) |
| Waterproof | IP68 | IP68 |
| Advanced cooling | - | Vapor chamber |
| Rear material | Glass | Glass |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | White, Black, Purple | White, Black, Blue |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-display | Yes, in-display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G |
| Max clock | 2840 MHz | 2840 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4 cores at 1.8 GHz: Kryo 680 Silver (Cortex-A55) - 3 cores at 2.42 GHz: Kryo 680 Gold (Cortex-A78) - 1 core at 2.84 GHz: Kryo 680 Prime (Cortex-X1) |
- 4 cores at 1.8 GHz: Kryo 680 Silver (Cortex-A55) - 3 cores at 2.42 GHz: Kryo 680 Gold (Cortex-A78) - 1 core at 2.84 GHz: Kryo 680 Prime (Cortex-X1) |
| L3 cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
| Manufacturing | Samsung | Samsung |
| Lithography process | 5 nanometers | 5 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Hexagon 780 | Hexagon 780 |
| Graphics | Adreno 660 | Adreno 660 |
| GPU shading units | 768 | 768 |
| GPU clock | 840 MHz | 840 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~1290.2 GFLOPS | ~1290.2 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 4509 | - |
| Single-core score | 1488 | 1263 |
| Multi-core score | 3373 | 3476 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 380054 | 372454 |
| GPU | 265991 | 246524 |
| Memory | 171608 | 183481 |
| UX | 301555 | 320684 |
| Total score | 1119208 | 1123143 |
| Samples | Less than 3 | Less than 3 |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Graphics test | 4 FPS | - |
| Graphics score | 505 | - |
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
| Stability | 62% | 63% |
| Graphics test | 9 FPS | 9 FPS |
| Graphics score | 1527 | 1523 |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | - | 9751 |
| Video editing | - | 6136 |
| Photo editing | - | 26259 |
| Data manipulation | - | 9325 |
| Writing score | - | 14614 |
Recent User Tests
Oppo Find X5
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2024-03-28 (Omar Ahmed) | Geekbench 6 GPU | 4509 |
| π 2024-03-28 (Omar Ahmed) | Geekbench 6 CPU | 1488 / 3373 |
Oppo Find X3 Pro
No benchmark results yet
Memory
| RAM size | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5 |
| Memory clock | 3200 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage size | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 12.1 (Can be upgraded to Android 14) | Android 11 (Can be upgraded to Android 14) |
| ROM | ColorOS 12.1 | ColorOS 11.2 |
| OS size | - | 19.1 GB |
| OS updates | 3 years | - |
| Security updates | 4 years | - |
Battery
| Capacity | 4800 mAh | 4500 mAh |
| Max charge power | 80 W | 65 W |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | Yes (30 W) | Yes (30 W) |
| Reverse charging | Yes, (wireless) | Yes, (wireless) |
| Fast charging | Yes (94% in 30 min) | Yes, SuperVOOC 3.0 (100% in 29 min) |
| Full charging time | 0:42 hr | 0:29 hr |
| Web browsing | 07:47 hr | 06:45 hr |
| Watching video | 12:38 hr | 09:56 hr |
| Gaming | 05:27 hr | 04:33 hr |
| Standby | 93 hr | 83 hr |
General battery life
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8700 x 5800 | 8700 x 5800 |
| Zoom | Optical, 2x | Optical, 2x |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Slow motion | 480 FPS (720p) | 240 FPS (1080p) |
| Angle of widest lens | 110Β° | 110Β° |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 13 MP 3) Ultrawide: 50 MP |
1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 13 MP 3) Ultrawide: 50 MP 4) Macro: 3 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode - RAW support |
- Bokeh mode - Pro mode - RAW support |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | 24 mm | 26 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX766 | Sony IMX766 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.56" (β 0.64 inch) | 1/1.56" (β 0.64 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1 micron | 1 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 13 MP | 13 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | f/2.4 |
| Focal length | 52 mm | 52 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5K3M5 | Samsung S5K3M5 |
| Sensor size | 1/3.4" (β 0.29 inch) | 1/3.4" (β 0.29 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1 micron | 1 micron |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 15 mm | 16 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX766 | Sony IMX766 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.56" (β 0.64 inch) | 1/1.56" (β 0.64 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1 micron | 1 micron |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Image resolution | - | 3 MP |
| Aperture | - | f/3.0 |
| Sensor | - | GalaxyCore GC5035 |
| Sensor size | - | 1/5" (β 0.2 inch) |
| Pixel size | - | 1.12 micron |
| Stabilization | - | Digital |
DxOMark main camera tests
Photo quality
Video quality
Generic main camera score
| Bokeh | 60 | 70 |
| Preview | 60 | 71 |
| Zoom | 104 | 102 |
| Samples | Photo samples of Oppo Find X5 from DxOMark | Photo samples of Oppo Find X3 Pro from DxOMark |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 32 megapixels | 32 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 6560 x 4928 | 6560 x 4928 |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | f/2.4 |
| Focal length | 25 mm | 26 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX615 | Sony IMX615 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.74" (β 0.36 inch) | 1/2.8" (β 0.36 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.8 micron | 0.8 micron |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.1 | 3.1 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - USB-Host mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - USB-Host mode - OTG |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared port | No | No |
| Number of SIM* | 2 | 2 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
| eSIM support* | Yes | No |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| LTE Cat* | 20 | 20 |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | February 2022 | March 2021 |
| Release date | March 2022 | March 2021 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1000 | $1150 |
| Successor | - Oppo Find X9 | - Oppo Find X5 Pro |
| SAR (head) | - | 0.88 W/kg |
| SAR (body) | - | 1.22 W/kg |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 80 W | - |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
If the display and camera are more important to you, then choose the Oppo Find X3 Pro. But if the battery life and connectivity are more of a priority β go for the Oppo Find X5.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 147