Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro vs Oppo K13 Turbo Pro
79
out of 100
VS
77
out of 100
Here we compared two mid-range smartphones: the 6.83-inch Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4) that was released on April 24, 2025, against the Oppo K13 Turbo Pro, which is powered by the same chip and came out 3 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro
- Has 50% more RAM: 12GB versus 8GB
- Slow-motion recording at 960FPS
- More recent OS version: Android 16 versus 15
- Supports higher wattage charging (90W versus 80W)
- Faster storage type - UFS 4.1 versus UFS 4.0
Reasons to consider the Oppo K13 Turbo Pro
- Waterproof body (IP69 classification)
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.83 inches | 6.8 inches |
| Resolution | 1280 x 2772 pixels | 1280 x 2800 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19.5:9 | 19.5:9 |
| PPI | 447 ppi | 453 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (1-120 Hz) | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max rated brightness | 1800 nits | 1600 nits |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | 3200 nits | - |
| HDR support | Yes, Dolby Vision | No |
| Touch sampling rate | 480 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Screen protection | Tempered glass | AGC DT-Star D+ |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.1% | 90.3% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
Design and build
| Height | 163.1 mm (6.42 inches) | 162.8 mm (6.41 inches) |
| Width | 77.93 mm (3.07 inches) | 77.2 mm (3.04 inches) |
| Thickness | 7.98 mm (0.31 inches) | 8.3 mm (0.33 inches) |
| Weight | 219 g (7.72 oz) | 208 g (7.34 oz) |
| Waterproof | IP68 | IP69 |
| Advanced cooling | Vapor chamber | Active fan |
| Rear material | Glass | - |
| Frame material | Metal | Plastic |
| Colors | White, Black, Green | Black, Silver, Purple |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-display | Yes, in-display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 |
| Max clock | 3210 MHz | 3210 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 2 + 2) | 8 (1 + 3 + 2 + 2) |
| Architecture | - 2 cores at 2.02 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 2 cores at 2.8 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 3 cores at 3 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 1 core at 3.21 GHz: Cortex-X4 |
- 2 cores at 2.02 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 2 cores at 2.8 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 3 cores at 3 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 1 core at 3.21 GHz: Cortex-X4 |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | 8 MB |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 4 nanometers | 4 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Hexagon | Hexagon |
| Graphics | Adreno 825 | Adreno 825 |
| GPU shading units | 1024 | 1024 |
| GPU clock | 1150 MHz | 1150 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~2355.2 GFLOPS | ~2355.2 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 18498 | 13041 |
| Single-core score | 2002 | 2068 |
| Multi-core score | 7029 | 6385 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 660045 | 711180 |
| GPU | 807212 | 825194 |
| Memory | 351865 | 301194 |
| UX | 473419 | 504132 |
| Total score | 2292541 | 2341700 |
| Samples | [84 tests] | [25 tests] |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | 82% | 64% |
| Graphics test | 13 FPS | 13 FPS |
| Graphics score | 1688 | 1790 |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Graphics test | 29 FPS | 32 FPS |
| Section 1 | 33 FPS | 35 FPS |
| Section 2 | 29 FPS | 32 FPS |
| Section 3 | 24 FPS | 27 FPS |
| Graphics score | 7542 | 8293 |
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
| Graphics test | 22 FPS | - |
| Graphics score | 3705 | - |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 15610 | 18096 |
| Video editing | 7765 | 7532 |
| Photo editing | 30492 | 26855 |
| Data manipulation | 14151 | 14510 |
| Writing score | 18243 | 21062 |
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (187th and 175th place)
Recent User Tests
Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-09-08 (uniq) | AnTuTu | 2306405 |
| π 2026-09-07 (Kirkiri) | Battery life | SOT 6:33 / 13:02 |
| π 2026-08-09 (Dat) | AnTuTu | 2044042 |
| π 2026-08-08 (Harald "Halfdan" Zigurdzzon) | AnTuTu | 2220150 |
| π 2026-07-05 (Moen) | AnTuTu | 2325150 |
Oppo K13 Turbo Pro
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-08-27 (Dhdhd) | AnTuTu | 2519399 |
| π 2026-08-21 (Dice Morgan) | AnTuTu | 2348057 |
| π 2026-08-03 (EXILER) | AnTuTu | 2319105 |
| π 2026-08-03 -> Tushar_dmrc | AnTuTu | 2323613 |
| π 2026-07-22 (Mr Rahman) | AnTuTu | 2376220 |
Memory
| RAM size | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory clock | 4800 MHz | 4800 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage size | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) | Android 15 |
| ROM | HyperOS 3.0 | ColorOS 15 |
Battery
| Capacity | 7550 mAh | 7000 mAh |
| Max charge power | 90 W | 80 W |
| Battery type | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse charging | Yes | Yes |
| Bypass charging | No | - |
| Fast charging | Yes (50% in 27 min) | Yes (63% in 30 min) |
| Full charging time | 1:00 hr | 0:56 hr |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8192 x 6144 | 8192 x 6144 |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | Dual LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Slow motion | 960 FPS (1080p) | 120 FPS (1080p) |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Ultrawide: 8 MP |
1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Depth: 2 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
- Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.5 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | 26 mm | 27 mm |
| Sensor | Sony LYT-600 | - |
| Sensor size | 1/1.95" (β 0.51 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 0.8 micron | - |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 8 MP | - |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | - |
| Focal length | 15 mm | - |
| Sensor | Sony IMX355 | - |
| Sensor size | 1/4.0" (β 0.25 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 1.14 micron | - |
| Stabilization | Digital | - |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 20 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4920 x 3264 |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.4 |
| Focal length | 25 mm | 22 mm |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV20B | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/4.0" (β 0.25 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 0.7 micron | - |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 60 FPS | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Number of SIM* | 2 | 2 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
| eSIM support* | No | No |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Other
| Category | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Announced | April 2025 | July 2025 |
| Release date | April 2025 | July 2025 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $349 | $359 |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 90 W | Yes, 80 W |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
These smartphones have a lot in common, but we would recommend the Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro. It has a better camera and software.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 167
