Realme GT 8 Pro vs Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max

Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.79-inch Realme GT 8 Pro (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5) that was released on October 21, 2025, against the Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max, which is powered by Apple A19 Pro and came out 1 month before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Realme GT 8 Pro
  • Delivers 301% higher peak brightness (4034 against 1005 nits)
  • Comes with 1912 mAh larger battery capacity: 7000 vs 5088 mAh
  • 55% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (4024K versus 2590K)
  • Higher display refresh rate – 144 Hz
  • Shows 12% longer battery life (37:13 vs 33:14 hours)
  • Supports higher wattage charging (120W versus 40W)
  • Waterproof body (IP69 classification)
  • Fingerprint scanner
  • 10% higher pixel density (508 vs 460 PPI)
  • Has a built-in infrared port
Reasons to consider the Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
  • The rear camera has a 4x optical zoom
  • Supports Dolby Atmos sound technology

Review

Evaluation of Realme GT 8 Pro and Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
📱 Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
12 / 256 GB
VS
12 / 256 GB
33.0
(Mediocre)
Value Index
39.5
(Mediocre)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests

Display

Type OLED OLED
Size 6.79 inches 6.9 inches
Resolution 1440 x 3136 pixels 1320 x 2868 pixels
Aspect ratio 19.5:9 19.5:9
PPI 508 ppi 460 ppi
Refresh rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes Yes (1-120 Hz)
Max rated brightness 2000 nits 3000 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 7000 nits 1600 nits
HDR support Yes, Dolby Vision Yes, Dolby Vision
Screen protection 60-120 Ceramic Shield 2
Screen-to-body ratio 91% 91.6%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
- DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
Display tests
RGB color space - 99.9%
PWM - 240 Hz
Response time - 1 ms
Contrast - ∞ Infinity
Peak brightness test (auto)
GT 8 Pro +301%
4034 nits
1005 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3]

Design and build

Height 161.8 mm (6.37 inches) 163.4 mm (6.43 inches)
Width 76.87 mm (3.03 inches) 78 mm (3.07 inches)
Thickness 8.2 mm (0.32 inches) 8.75 mm (0.34 inches)
Weight 214 g (7.55 oz) 233 g (8.22 oz)
Waterproof IP69 IP68
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber Vapor chamber
Rear material Plastic Glass
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors White, Blue, Green Silver, Blue, Orange
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display No
Repairability Good (3.24/5) Good (3.04/5)
Drop resistance Average (D) · 60 drops Very good (B) · 180 drops
Screen-to-body ratio
91%
91.6%

Performance

Chipset specifications of Realme GT 8 Pro and Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
SoC
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 Apple A19 Pro
Max clock 4600 MHz 4260 MHz
CPU cores 8 (2 + 6) 6 (2 + 4)
Architecture - 6 cores at 3.63 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Performance
- 2 cores at 4.74 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Prime
- 4 cores at 2.6 GHz:
- 2 cores at 4.26 GHz:
L3 cache 12 MB -
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 3 nanometers 3 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon Apple Neural Engine
GPU
Graphics Adreno 840 6 core Apple GPU
GPU shading units 1536 768
GPU clock 1300 MHz 1620 MHz
FLOPS ~3993.6 GFLOPS ~2488.3 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Realme GT 8 Pro and Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
3711
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
GT 8 Pro +7%
11175
Compute Score (GPU)
28004
46450
Compute Score (GPU) 28004 46450
Single-core score 3711 3940
Multi-core score 11175 10434
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
GT 8 Pro +55%
4024736
CPU 1129296 788283
GPU 1516328 922741
Memory 465192 226010
UX 913920 653533
Total score 4024736 2590567
Samples [14 tests] [14 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
GT 8 Pro +21%
3001
Stability - 76%
Graphics test 22 FPS 18 FPS
Graphics score 3001 2487
3DMark Solar Bay
GT 8 Pro +18%
12974
Graphics test 49 FPS 42 FPS
Section 1 57 FPS 47 FPS
Section 2 49 FPS 42 FPS
Section 3 42 FPS 36 FPS
Graphics score 12974 10999
Sources: 3DMark [5], [6]
PCMark 3.0
Web score 30905 -
Video editing 7273 -
Photo editing 69025 -
Data manipulation 18371 -
Writing score 43824 -

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Realme GT 8 Pro
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-08-18 (Mj.)AnTuTu4016269
📘 2026-08-03 (Gulhark)AnTuTu3957182
📘 2026-07-23 (Zergo)AnTuTu3898421
📘 2026-07-16 (Vladsmesh)AnTuTu4243822
📘 2026-05-14 (mrt)AnTuTu4379440
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-07-31 (xon1005)GeekBench CPU4028 / 10579
📘 2026-06-15 (Domi)AnTuTu2427596
📘 2026-06-09 (Cristiano)AnTuTu2258714
📘 2026-05-29 (Joker)AnTuTu2433128
📘 2026-05-16 (Duy Dang)GeekBench GPU46574

Memory

RAM
RAM size 12 GB 12 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory clock 5300 MHz -
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 4.1 NVMe
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 16 iOS 26 (Can be upgraded to iOS 26.5)
ROM Realme UI 7.0 -
OS size - 20 GB
OS updates 4 years 7 years
Security updates 4 years 7 years

Battery

Capacity 7000 mAh 5088 mAh
Max charge power 120 W 40 W
Battery type Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) Li-Ion
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging Yes (50 W) Yes (25 W)
Reverse charging Yes, (wireless) Yes
Bypass charging Yes No
Fast charging Yes (86% in 15 min) Yes (65% in 30 min)
Full charging time 0:40 hr 1:12 hr
Battery cycles 1100 cycles 1000 cycles
Battery life tests
Web browsing 16:17 hr 12:36 hr
Watching video 24:49 hr 22:25 hr
Gaming 08:34 hr 08:17 hr
Standby 157 hr 154 hr
General battery life
GT 8 Pro +12%
37:13 hr

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 48 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 8064 x 6048
Zoom Optical, 3x Optical, 4x
Flash Dual LED Dual LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording Up to 30FPS No
4K video recording Up to 120FPS Up to 120FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 120FPS
Slow motion 240 FPS (1080p) 240 FPS (1080p)
Angle of widest lens 112° 120°
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 200 MP
3) Ultrawide: 50 MP
1) Standard: 48 MP
2) Telephoto: 48 MP
3) Ultrawide: 48 MP
4) Depth
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 48 MP
Aperture f/1.9 f/1.78
Focal length 24 mm 24 mm
Sensor - Sony IMX903
Sensor size 1/1.56" (≈ 0.64 inch) 1/1.28" (≈ 0.78 inch)
Pixel size 1 micron 1.22 micron
Autofocus Laser autofocus Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel)
Stabilization Optical Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution 200 MP 48 MP
Aperture f/2.6 f/2.8
Focal length 65 mm 100 mm
Sensor Samsung ISOCELL S5KHP5 Sony IMX973
Sensor size 1/1.56" (≈ 0.64 inch) 1/2.55" (≈ 0.39 inch)
Pixel size 0.5 micron 0.7 micron
Stabilization Optical Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 50 MP 48 MP
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.2
Focal length 16 mm 13 mm
Sensor OmniVision OV50D Sony IMX972
Sensor size 1/2.88" (≈ 0.35 inch) 1/2.55" (≈ 0.39 inch)
Pixel size 0.64 micron 0.7 micron
Stabilization Digital Digital

Selfie camera

Megapixels 32 megapixels 18 megapixels
Image resolution 6528 x 4896 4896 x 3672
Aperture f/2.4 f/1.9
Focal length 24 mm 20 mm
Sensor CMOS Sony IMX914
Sensor size 1/3.1" (≈ 0.32 inch) -
Pixel size 0.7 micron 1 micron
Autofocus No Phase autofocus
Stabilization Digital Optical
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No Yes

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 6.0 6.0
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 3.2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort No Yes
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port Yes No
Network
Number of SIM* 2 -
Type of SIM card Nano eSIM
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* Yes Yes
Hybrid slot No No
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos No Yes
Speakers test
Max loudness

Other

Category Flagship Flagship
Announced October 2025 September 2025
Release date November 2025 September 2025
Launch price (MSRP) $999 $1199
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Barometer
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Face recognition sensor
Bundled charger Yes, 120 W Not included
Further details
Notes on iPhone 17 Pro Max:
    - Battery is 5,088 mAh on the eSIM-only model (vs 4,832 mAh on the Nano SIM + eSIM version).
    - The Chinese model alone includes dual Nano SIM slots and 15 W wireless charging.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

If the camera, connectivity, software, design, and sound are more important to you, then choose the Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max. But if the display and battery life are more of a priority – go for the Realme GT 8 Pro.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
347 (94.3%)
21 (5.7%)
Total votes: 368

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Haha February 16, 2026 at 05:39 AM
Apple clearly lost after this realme release....
+2 Reply