Samsung Galaxy A15 4G vs Honor X7a

47 out of 100
Samsung Galaxy A15 4G
VS
37 out of 100
Honor X7a

Here we compared two budget smartphones: the 6.5-inch Samsung Galaxy A15 4G (with MediaTek Helio G99) that was released on December 11, 2023, against the Honor X7a, which is powered by MediaTek Helio G37 and came out 11 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy A15 4G
  • 2.7x better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (522K versus 194K)
  • 52% higher pixel density (396 vs 260 PPI)
  • Delivers 44% higher peak brightness (811 against 563 nits)
  • Newer Bluetooth version (v5.3)
  • More recent OS version: Android 16 versus 12
  • More energy-efficient CPU โ€“ Helio G99
  • Slow-motion recording at 120FPS
  • Super AMOLED display (versus competitor's TFT LCD)
  • The phone is 11 months newer
Reasons to consider the Honor X7a
  • Comes with 1000 mAh larger battery capacity: 6000 vs 5000 mAh
  • Reverse charging feature

Review

Evaluation of Samsung Galaxy A15 4G and Honor X7a crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
๐Ÿ“ฑ Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your countryโ€™s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
4 / 128 GB
VS
4 / 128 GB
73.6
(Good)
Value Index
14.3
(Bad)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests

Display

Type Super AMOLED TFT LCD
Size 6.5 inches 6.74 inches
Resolution 1080 x 2340 pixels 720 x 1600 pixels
Aspect ratio 19.5:9 20:9
PPI 396 ppi 260 ppi
Refresh rate 90 Hz 90 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate No No
Max rated brightness 800 nits 450 nits
HDR support No No
Screen protection Tempered glass Tempered glass
Screen-to-body ratio 84.4% 85.3%
Display features - DCI-P3 -
Display tests
RGB color space 100% 93.7%
PWM 187 Hz Not detected
Response time 1 ms 25 ms
Contrast โˆž Infinity 2254:1
Peak brightness test (auto)
811 nits
563 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3], [4]

Design and build

Height 160.1 mm (6.3 inches) 167.48 mm (6.59 inches)
Width 76.8 mm (3.02 inches) 76.85 mm (3.03 inches)
Thickness 8.4 mm (0.33 inches) 8.27 mm (0.33 inches)
Weight 200 g (7.05 oz) 196 g (6.91 oz)
Waterproof No No
Rear material Plastic Plastic
Frame material Plastic Plastic
Colors Black, Blue, Yellow Black, Silver, Blue
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-button Yes, in-button
Screen-to-body ratio
Honor X7a +1%
85.3%

Performance

Chipset specifications of Samsung Galaxy A15 4G and Honor X7a
SoC
Chipset MediaTek Helio G99 MediaTek Helio G37
Max clock 2200 MHz 2300 MHz
CPU cores 8 (2 + 6) 8 (4 + 4)
Architecture - 6 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A55
- 2 cores at 2.2 GHz: Cortex-A76
- 4 cores at 1.8 GHz: Cortex-A53
- 4 cores at 2.3 GHz: Cortex-A53
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 6 nanometers 12 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Yes No
GPU
Graphics Mali-G57 MC2 PowerVR GE8320
GPU shading units 64 32
GPU clock 1000 MHz 680 MHz
FLOPS ~128 GFLOPS ~43.5 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Samsung Galaxy A15 4G and Honor X7a
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
708
193
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
1862
845
Compute Score (GPU)
Compute Score (GPU) 32758 -
Single-core score 708 193
Multi-core score 1862 845
Sources: Geekbench [3]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
522075
194025
CPU 203294 88958
GPU 42919 12136
Memory 120509 48019
UX 155353 44912
Total score 522075 194025
Samples [18 tests] Less than 3
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Graphics test 1 FPS -
Graphics score 130 -
Sources: 3DMark [5], [6]
PCMark 3.0
9035
5552
Web score 9148 5320
Video editing 4687 5172
Photo editing 14623 7644
Data manipulation 7719 4332
Writing score 11588 5787

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Samsung Galaxy A15 4G
DateBenchmarkResult
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-08-31 (Muhammedali)AnTuTu503324
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-08-30 (Yusif)AnTuTu531994
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-07-24 (LEADER OF DAWN)GeekBench CPU724 / 1991
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-07-06 (ุนูŠู† ุดู…ุณุงูˆูŠ)AnTuTu480715
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-04-24 (Empty.surprises)AnTuTu530693
Honor X7a
DateBenchmarkResult
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-02-04 (ัŽั‚ัƒะฑ MIKOND_2010)AnTuTu194025

Memory

RAM
RAM size 4 GB 4 GB
Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory clock 2133 MHz 2133 MHz
Channels 2 2
Storage
Storage size 128 GB 128 GB
Storage type UFS 2.2 eMMC 5.1
Memory card MicroSD MicroSD
Memory card max size Up to 1024 GB Up to 1024 GB

Software

Operating system Android 14 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) Android 12
ROM One UI 8.5 Magic UI 6.1
OS size 23 GB 18 GB
OS updates 2 years -
Security updates 3 years -

Battery

Capacity 5000 mAh 6000 mAh
Max charge power 25 W 22.5 W
Battery type Li-Ion Li-Po
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging No No
Reverse charging No Yes
Fast charging Yes (47% in 30 min) Yes (80% in 80 min)
Full charging time 1:21 hr 1:55 hr
Battery life tests
Web browsing 09:21 hr -
Watching video 15:42 hr -
Gaming 07:54 hr -
Standby 137 hr -
General battery life
26:31 hr
n/a

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 8160 x 6120 8192 x 6144
Zoom Digital Digital
Flash LED LED
Stabilization Digital Digital
8K video recording No No
4K video recording No No
1080p video recording Up to 30FPS Up to 30FPS
Slow motion 120 FPS (720p) No
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Ultrawide: 5 MP
3) Macro: 2 MP
1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Ultrawide: 5 MP
3) Macro: 2 MP
4) Depth: 2 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/1.8 f/1.8
Focal length 26 mm -
Sensor Hynix Hi5022Q -
Sensor size 1/2.8" (โ‰ˆ 0.36 inch) -
Pixel size 0.64 micron 0.8 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Digital Digital
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 5 MP 5 MP
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.2
Focal length 17 mm -
Sensor SmartSense SC501CS -
Sensor size 1/5" (โ‰ˆ 0.2 inch) -
Pixel size 1.12 micron -
Stabilization Digital Digital
Macro lens
Image resolution 2 MP 2 MP
Aperture f/2.4 f/2.4
Sensor GalaxyCore GC02M1 -
Stabilization No Digital

Selfie camera

Megapixels 13 megapixels 8 megapixels
Image resolution 4128 x 3096 3264 x 2448
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.0
Focal length 26 mm -
Sensor GalaxyCore GC013A CMOS
Sensor size 1/3.06" (โ‰ˆ 0.33 inch) -
Pixel size 1.12 micron -
Autofocus No No
Stabilization No Digital
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.3 5.1
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
NFC* Depends on the region Depends on the region
Infrared port No No
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* No No
Hybrid slot No No
LTE Cat* 13 7
5G support No No

Sound

Speakers Mono Mono
Headphone audio jack Yes Yes
FM radio Yes No
Dolby Atmos Yes No
Speakers test
Max loudness
83.8 dB
79.6 dB

Other

Category Budget Budget
Announced December 2023 January 2023
Release date December 2023 January 2023
Launch price (MSRP) $170 $180
Successor - Samsung Galaxy A17 4G - Honor X7d
Sensors - Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Not included Yes, 22 W
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

After analyzing all the data, we think that the Samsung Galaxy A15 4G is definitely a better buy.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
8 (72.7%)
3 (27.3%)
Total votes: 11

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
๐ŸŒ Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!