Samsung Galaxy S10 vs Honor 400
Here we compared two smartphones: the 6.1-inch Samsung Galaxy S10 (with Exynos 9 Octa 9820) that was released on February 20, 2019, against the Honor 400, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 and came out 6 years and 4 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy S10
- The rear camera has a 2x optical zoom
- Handles Qi/PMA wireless charging up to 9W
- Expandable storage via MicroSD card up to 512GB
- Waterproof body (IP68 classification)
- 20% higher pixel density (551 vs 460 PPI)
- Supports Dolby Atmos sound technology
- Weighs 27 grams less
- Includes a 3.5 mm headphone audio jack port
Reasons to consider the Honor 400
- Comes with 2600 mAh larger battery capacity: 6000 vs 3400 mAh
- Higher display refresh rate – 120 Hz
- Delivers 88% higher peak brightness (1541 against 818 nits)
- Supports higher wattage charging (80W versus 15W)
- 46% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (1087K versus 747K)
- Newer Bluetooth version (v5.4)
- Has a 0.45 inch larger screen size
- More recent OS version: Android 16 versus 12
- The phone is 6 years and 4 months newer
- More energy-efficient CPU – Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
- Uses a faster type of memory: LPDDR5
- Has 33% more RAM: 8GB versus 6GB
- Ready for eSIM technology
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.1 inches | 6.55 inches |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3040 pixels | 1264 x 2736 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19:9 | 19.5:9 |
| PPI | 551 ppi | 460 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | Yes |
| Max rated brightness | 1215 nits | 1600 nits |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | - | 5000 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, HDR10+ | Yes, HDR10+ |
| Touch sampling rate | - | 240 Hz |
| Screen protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 | Tempered glass |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 88% | 90.2% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
| RGB color space | 98.1% | - |
| PWM | 240 Hz | - |
| Response time | 4.8 ms | - |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinity | - |
Screen space comparison
Honor 400
6.55″ (19.5:9 ratio) = 16.3 in2
Galaxy S10
6.1″ (19:9 ratio) = 14.4 in2
~13% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 149.9 mm (5.9 inches) | 156.5 mm (6.16 inches) |
| Width | 70.4 mm (2.77 inches) | 74.6 mm (2.94 inches) |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm (0.31 inches) | 7.3 mm (0.29 inches) |
| Weight | 157 g (5.54 oz) | 184 g (6.49 oz) |
| Waterproof | IP68 | IP66 |
| Advanced cooling | - | Vapor chamber |
| Rear material | Glass | Plastic |
| Frame material | Metal | Plastic |
| Colors | White, Black, Blue, Green | Black, Silver, Gold, Blue |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-display | Yes, in-display |
| Repairability | - | Good (3.63/5) |
| Drop resistance | - | Very good (B) · 180 drops |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 9820 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 |
| Max clock | 2730 MHz | 2630 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (2 + 2 + 4) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4 cores at 1.95 GHz: Cortex-A55 - 2 cores at 2.31 GHz: Cortex-A75 - 2 cores at 2.73 GHz: Mongoose M4 |
- 4 cores at 1.8 GHz: Kryo Silver (Cortex-A510) - 3 cores at 2.4 GHz: Kryo Gold (Cortex-A715) - 1 core at 2.63 GHz: Kryo Prime (Cortex-A715) |
| L3 cache | - | 3 MB |
| Manufacturing | Samsung | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 8 nanometers | 4 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes |
| Graphics | Mali G76 MP12 | Adreno 720 |
| GPU shading units | 288 | 512 |
| GPU clock | 702 MHz | 975 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~404.4 GFLOPS | ~998.4 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 4837 | 4060 |
| Single-core score | 986 | 1136 |
| Multi-core score | 2961 | 3107 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 303198 | 403084 |
| GPU | 133774 | 207834 |
| Memory | 148749 | 216538 |
| UX | 161536 | 260069 |
| Total score | 747257 | 1087525 |
| Samples | [16 tests] | [32 tests] |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | 81% | - |
| Graphics test | 3 FPS | - |
| Graphics score | 367 | - |
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
| Stability | 82% | - |
| Graphics test | 5 FPS | - |
| Graphics score | 949 | - |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 7433 | - |
| Video editing | 5772 | - |
| Photo editing | 18351 | - |
| Data manipulation | 7663 | - |
| Writing score | 10349 | - |
Recent User Tests
Samsung Galaxy S10
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-09-06 (Nythoxx) | AnTuTu | 777426 |
| 📘 2026-08-13 (ODIN_MODE) | GeekBench CPU | 1065 / 2623 |
| 📘 2026-07-11 -> Sergo67 | AnTuTu | 613741 |
| 📘 2026-04-10 (Dio) | AnTuTu | 756403 |
| 📘 2026-04-01 (LowbudgetNontecktoker) | AnTuTu | 752759 |
Honor 400
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-08-11 (Baclaven) | AnTuTu | 947758 |
| 📘 2026-07-15 (Iulitic211Rg) | AnTuTu | 1102591 |
| 📘 2026-07-04 (TheOdin) | AnTuTu | 1098513 |
| 📘 2026-06-08 (brozzlex) | AnTuTu | 1089031 |
| 📘 2026-06-02 (ElijaHaH) | GeekBench GPU | 3475 |
Memory
| RAM size | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5 |
| Memory clock | 2133 MHz | - |
| Channels | 2 | 4 |
| Storage size | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card | MicroSD | No |
| Memory card max size | Up to 512 GB | - |
Software
| Operating system | Android 9.0 (Can be upgraded to Android 12) | Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) |
| ROM | One UI 4.0 | MagicOS 10 |
| OS size | 9.5 GB | - |
| OS updates | 2 years | 6 years |
| Security updates | 4 years | 6 years |
Battery
| Capacity | 3400 mAh | 6000 mAh |
| Max charge power | 15 W | 80 W |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | Yes, Qi/PMA (9 W) | No |
| Reverse charging | Yes, (wireless) | Yes |
| Bypass charging | - | Yes |
| Fast charging | Yes, Samsung Adaptive Fast Charge (50% in 30 min) | Yes (80% in 30 min) |
| Full charging time | 1:35 hr | 0:41 hr |
| Battery cycles | - | 1200 cycles |
| Web browsing | 13:03 hr | 09:20 hr |
| Watching video | 14:48 hr | 12:17 hr |
| Gaming | 05:16 hr | 05:43 hr |
| Standby | 73 hr | 121 hr |
General battery life
Main camera
| Matrix | 12 megapixels | 200 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 16384 x 12288 |
| Zoom | Optical, 2x | Digital |
| Flash | Dual LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 30FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 240FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Slow motion | 960 FPS (720p) | - |
| Angle of widest lens | 123° | 112° |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 12 MP 2) Telephoto: 12 MP 3) Ultrawide: 16 MP |
1) Standard: 200 MP 2) Ultrawide: 12 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode - RAW support |
- Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
| Image resolution | 12 MP | 200 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.5 - 2.4 | f/1.9 |
| Focal length | 26 mm | - |
| Sensor | Samsung SAK2L4 | Samsung ISOCELL HP3 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.55" (≈ 0.39 inch) | 1/1.4" (≈ 0.71 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1.4 micron | 0.56 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 12 MP | - |
| Aperture | f/1.5 | - |
| Focal length | 52 mm | - |
| Sensor | Samsung S5K3M3 | - |
| Sensor size | 1/3.6" (≈ 0.28 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 1 micron | - |
| Stabilization | Optical | - |
| Image resolution | 16 MP | 12 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 12 mm | - |
| Sensor size | 1/3.1" (≈ 0.32 inch) | - |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
DxOMark main camera tests
Photo quality
Video quality
Generic main camera score
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 10 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 4320 x 2432 | 8192 x 6144 |
| Aperture | f/1.9 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 26 mm | - |
| Sensor | Samsung S5K3J1 | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.65" (≈ 0.38 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 1.22 micron | 0.64 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS | 2160p (4K) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ax) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | PBAP/PAB, PAN, OPP, MAP, LE, HSP, HID, HFP, DIP, AVRCP, A2DP | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.1 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | - | No |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, QZSS |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared port | No | Yes |
| Number of SIM* | 2 | 2 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
| eSIM support* | No | Yes |
| Hybrid slot | Yes | No |
| LTE Cat* | 20 | - |
| 5G support | No | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | Yes | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Flagship | Mid-range |
| Announced | February 2019 | May 2025 |
| Release date | March 2019 | May 2025 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $900 | $499 |
| Successor | - Samsung Galaxy S25 FE | - Honor 500 |
| SAR (head) | 0.48 W/kg | - |
| SAR (body) | 1.59 W/kg | - |
| Sensors | - Hall-effect sensor - Barometer - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | - | Yes, 100 W |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the Honor 400 is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 4
Related comparisons
8.
Honor 400 vs Honor 200 (4)
10.
Honor 400 vs Oppo Reno 14 (2)