Samsung Galaxy S20 vs Galaxy A13

58 out of 100
Samsung Galaxy S20
VS
42 out of 100
Samsung Galaxy A13

Here we compared two smartphones: the 6.2-inch Samsung Galaxy S20 (with Exynos 9 Octa 990) that was released on February 11, 2020, against the Samsung Galaxy A13, which is powered by Exynos 850 and came out 2 years and 1 month after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory 8 / 128 GB

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy S20
  • Waterproof body (IP68 classification)
  • 3.9x better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (907K versus 231K)
  • Has 2.7x more RAM: 8GB versus 3GB
  • Higher display refresh rate – 120 Hz
  • 42% higher pixel density (566 vs 400 PPI)
  • Delivers 39% higher peak brightness (814 against 587 nits)
  • Handles wireless charging up to 15W
  • Optical image stabilization
  • The rear camera has a 1.1x optical zoom
  • Ability to record video in 4K resolution
  • Uses a faster type of memory: LPDDR5 3200 MHz
  • Compatible with Wi-Fi 6 wireless networks
  • Stereo speakers
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy A13
  • Shows 49% longer battery life (23:56 vs 16:07 hours)
  • Comes with 1000 mAh larger battery capacity: 5000 vs 4000 mAh
  • Has a 0.4 inch larger screen size
  • More recent OS version: Android 14 versus 13
  • The phone is 2 years and 1 month newer
  • Includes a 3.5 mm headphone audio jack port

Review

Evaluation of Samsung Galaxy S20 and Galaxy A13 crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
📱 Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
8 / 128 GB
VS
3 / 32 GB
127.5
(Excellent)
Value Index
96.3
(Very good)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests

Display

Type Dynamic AMOLED PLS TFT
Size 6.2 inches 6.6 inches
Resolution 1440 x 3200 pixels 1080 x 2408 pixels
Aspect ratio 20:9 20:9
PPI 566 ppi 400 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 60 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate No No
Max rated brightness 800 nits 500 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 1200 nits -
HDR support Yes, HDR10+ No
Screen protection Corning Gorilla Glass 6 Corning Gorilla Glass 5
Screen-to-body ratio 88.5% 83.4%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
-
Display tests
RGB color space 99.8% 99.9%
PWM 242 Hz Not detected
Response time 8.5 ms 33 ms
Contrast ∞ Infinity 1257:1
Screen space comparison
Galaxy A13
6.6″ (20:9 ratio) = 16.3 in2
Galaxy S20
6.2″ (20:9 ratio) = 14.4 in2
~13% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
Galaxy S20 +39%
814 nits
587 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3], [4]

Design and build

Height 151.7 mm (5.97 inches) 165.1 mm (6.5 inches)
Width 69.1 mm (2.72 inches) 76.4 mm (3.01 inches)
Thickness 7.9 mm (0.31 inches) 8.8 mm (0.35 inches)
Weight 163 g (5.75 oz) 195 g (6.88 oz)
Waterproof IP68 No
Rear material Glass Plastic
Frame material Metal Plastic
Colors Gray, Blue, Red White, Black, Blue, Yellow
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-button
Screen-to-body ratio
88.5%
83.4%

Performance

Chipset specifications of Samsung Galaxy S20 and Samsung Galaxy A13
SoC
Chipset Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 990 Samsung Exynos 850
Max clock 3020 MHz 2000 MHz
CPU cores 8 (2 + 2 + 4) 8 (8)
Architecture - 4 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A55
- 2 cores at 2.5 GHz: Cortex-A76
- 2 cores at 2.73 GHz: Exynos M5
- 8 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A55
L3 cache 2 MB -
Manufacturing Samsung Samsung
Lithography process 7 nanometers 8 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Yes No
GPU
Graphics Mali-G77 MP11 Mali-G52
GPU shading units 352 16
GPU clock 550 MHz 1001 MHz
FLOPS ~585.7 GFLOPS ~48 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Samsung Galaxy S20 and Samsung Galaxy A13
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Galaxy S20 +110%
996
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Galaxy S20 +91%
2914
1523
Single-core score 996 474
Multi-core score 2914 1523
Sources: Geekbench [3]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
Galaxy S20 +291%
907140
231906
CPU 370196 87523
GPU 130687 17669
Memory 151878 86552
UX 254379 40162
Total score 907140 231906
Samples [4 tests] [7 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Stability 73% -
Graphics test 3 FPS -
Graphics score 391 -
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Stability 71% 97%
Graphics test 8 FPS -
Graphics score 1414 -
Sources: 3DMark [5], [6]
PCMark 3.0
Galaxy S20 +143%
11592
4777
Web score 9900 4792
Video editing 5850 4695
Photo editing 32007 7885
Data manipulation 8870 3252
Writing score 13632 4111

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Samsung Galaxy S20
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-06-17 -> wrathAnTuTu 11953700
📘 2026-06-16 (Wrath)AnTuTu 11907140
📘 2026-03-26 (Soulsinho)AnTuTu 11888046
📘 2026-01-20 (minxvix)AnTuTu 11876396
📘 2024-09-21 (Muhammad Abdullah Haider)Geekbench 6 CPU996 / 2914
Samsung Galaxy A13
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-07-25 (stockman50)AnTuTu 11266604
📘 2026-04-30 (SamsungPro)CPU Throttle95%
📘 2026-04-29 (SamsungPro)CPU Throttle94%
📘 2026-04-26 -> Viljami22CPU Throttle91%
📘 2026-04-26 -> Viljami22AnTuTu 11231833

Memory

RAM
RAM size 8 GB 3 GB
Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR4X
Memory clock 3200 MHz 2133 MHz
Channels 2 2
Storage
Storage size 128 GB 32 GB
Storage type UFS 3.0 eMMC 5.1
Memory card MicroSD MicroSD
Memory card max size Up to 1000 GB Up to 1024 GB

Software

Operating system Android 10.0 (Can be upgraded to Android 13) Android 12 (Can be upgraded to Android 14)
ROM One UI 5.1 One UI Core 6.1
OS size 20.1 GB 16.5 GB
OS updates 2 years 2 years
Security updates 4 years 3 years

Battery

Capacity 4000 mAh 5000 mAh
Max charge power 25 W 15 W
Battery type Li-Ion Li-Ion
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging Yes (15 W) No
Reverse charging Yes, (wireless) No
Fast charging Yes (100% in 75 min) Yes (27% in 30 min)
Full charging time 1:15 hr 2:18 hr
Battery life tests
Web browsing 06:49 hr 08:52 hr
Watching video 10:33 hr 13:18 hr
Gaming 04:30 hr 05:46 hr
Standby 69 hr 127 hr
General battery life
16:07 hr
Galaxy A13 +49%
23:56 hr

Main camera

Matrix 12 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 4000 x 3000 8192 x 6144
Zoom Optical, 1.1x Digital
Flash LED LED
Stabilization Optical Digital
8K video recording Up to 24FPS No
4K video recording Up to 60FPS No
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 30FPS
Slow motion 960 FPS (720p) -
Angle of widest lens 120° -
Lenses 1) Standard: 12 MP
2) Telephoto: 64 MP
3) Ultrawide: 12 MP
1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Ultrawide: 5 MP
3) Macro: 2 MP
4) Depth: 2 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
Standard lens
Image resolution 12 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/1.8 f/1.8
Focal length 26 mm 26 mm
Sensor Samsung S5K2LD Samsung S5KJN1
Sensor size 1/1.76" (≈ 0.57 inch) 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch)
Pixel size 1.8 micron 0.64 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) Phase autofocus
Stabilization Optical Digital
Telephoto lens
Image resolution 64 MP -
Aperture f/2.0 -
Focal length 29 mm -
Sensor Samsung Bright S5KGW2 -
Sensor size 1/1.72" (≈ 0.58 inch) -
Pixel size 0.8 micron -
Stabilization Optical -
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 12 MP 5 MP
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.2
Focal length 13 mm -
Sensor Samsung S5K2LA -
Sensor size 1/2.55" (≈ 0.39 inch) 1/5" (≈ 0.2 inch)
Pixel size 1.4 micron 1.12 micron
Stabilization Digital Digital
Macro lens
Image resolution - 2 MP
Aperture - f/2.4
Stabilization - Digital

Selfie camera

Megapixels 10 megapixels 8 megapixels
Image resolution 2592 x 3872 3264 x 2448
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.2
Focal length 26 mm -
Sensor Samsung S5K3J1 CMOS
Sensor size 1/3.2" (≈ 0.31 inch) -
Pixel size 1.22 micron -
Autofocus Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 b/g/n/ac/ax) Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac)
Wi-Fi features - Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5 5
Bluetooth features LE, A2DP PBAP/PAB, PAN, OPP, MAP, HSP, HID, HFP, DIP, AVRCP, A2DP
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 3.1 2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
NFC* Yes Depends on the region
Infrared port No No
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* Yes No
Hybrid slot Yes -
LTE Cat* 22 7
5G support No No

Sound

Speakers Stereo Mono
Headphone audio jack No Yes
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes Yes
Speakers test
Max loudness
85.9 dB
83.3 dB

Other

Category Flagship Budget
Announced February 2020 March 2022
Release date March 2020 March 2022
Launch price (MSRP) $999 $189
Successor - Samsung Galaxy S25 FE - Samsung Galaxy A17 4G
SAR (head) 0.28 W/kg 0.37 W/kg
SAR (body) 1.52 W/kg 1.39 W/kg
Sensors - Barometer
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Accelerometer
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger - Yes, 15 W
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

After analyzing all the data, we think that the Samsung Galaxy S20 is definitely a better buy.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
57 (56.4%)
44 (43.6%)
Total votes: 101

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Savagedanny September 12, 2022 at 06:52 PM
The Samsung galaxy A13 is a very good phone the battery last 2 days at a time.
+3 Reply
Avatar
Siroos August 26, 2022 at 05:04 PM
Very nice and detailed comparison.
+7 Reply