Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra vs OnePlus 13

87 out of 100
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
VS
87 out of 100
OnePlus 13

Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.9-inch Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite) that was released on January 22, 2025, against the OnePlus 13, which is powered by the same chip and came out 2 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
  • The rear camera has a 5x optical zoom
  • Delivers 18% higher peak brightness (1429 against 1208 nits)
  • Supports Dolby Atmos sound technology
  • 10% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 3202 and 2899 points
Reasons to consider the OnePlus 13
  • Comes with 1000 mAh larger battery capacity: 6000 vs 5000 mAh
  • Shows 9% longer battery life (31:17 vs 28:43 hours)
  • Waterproof body (IP69 classification)
  • Supports higher wattage charging (100W versus 45W)
  • Has 2 SIM card slots
  • Has a built-in infrared port

Review

Evaluation of Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra and OnePlus 13 crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
📱 Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
12 / 256 GB
VS
12 / 256 GB
38.2
(Mediocre)
Value Index
83.0
(Good)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests

Display

Type Dynamic AMOLED AMOLED
Size 6.9 inches 6.82 inches
Resolution 1440 x 3120 pixels 1440 x 3168 pixels
Aspect ratio 19.5:9 20:9
PPI 498 ppi 510 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (1-120 Hz) Yes (1-120 Hz)
Max rated brightness - 1600 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 2600 nits 4500 nits
HDR support Yes, HDR10+ Yes, Dolby Vision
Touch sampling rate 240 Hz -
Screen protection Corning Gorilla Armor 2 Ceramic Guard
Screen-to-body ratio 92.4% 90.1%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
- DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
Display tests
RGB color space 97.7% 99.6%
PWM 240 Hz 120 Hz
Response time 1 ms 2 ms
Contrast ∞ Infinity ∞ Infinity
Peak brightness test (auto)
1429 nits
1208 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3], [4]

Design and build

Height 162.8 mm (6.41 inches) 162.9 mm (6.41 inches)
Width 77.6 mm (3.06 inches) 76.5 mm (3.01 inches)
Thickness 8.2 mm (0.32 inches) 8.5 mm (0.33 inches)
Weight 218 g (7.69 oz) 213 g (7.51 oz)
Waterproof IP68 IP69
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber Vapor chamber
Rear material Glass Glass
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors Black, Silver, Gray, Blue White, Black, Blue
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Repairability Good (3.23/5) Good (3.71/5)
Drop resistance Excellent (A) · 270 drops Average (D) · 45 drops
Screen-to-body ratio
92.4%
90.1%

Performance

Chipset specifications of Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra and OnePlus 13
SoC
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
Max clock 4470 MHz 4320 MHz
CPU cores 8 (2 + 6) 8 (2 + 6)
Architecture - 6 cores at 3.53 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix M)
- 2 cores at 4.32 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix L)
- 6 cores at 3.53 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix M)
- 2 cores at 4.32 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix L)
L3 cache 8 MB 8 MB
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 3 nanometers 3 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon Hexagon
GPU
Graphics Adreno 830 Adreno 830
GPU shading units 1536 1536
GPU clock 1100 MHz 1100 MHz
FLOPS ~3379.2 GFLOPS ~3379.2 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra and OnePlus 13
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
3202
2899
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
10347
8945
Compute Score (GPU)
26581
24988
Compute Score (GPU) 26581 24988
Single-core score 3202 2899
Multi-core score 10347 8945
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
3145582
CPU 987646 946374
GPU 1190760 1154478
Memory 362214 370624
UX 587932 674106
Total score 3128552 3145582
Samples [66 tests] [33 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Stability 61% 74%
Graphics test 17 FPS 18 FPS
Graphics score 2272 2455
3DMark Solar Bay
11360
Graphics test 40 FPS 43 FPS
Section 1 50 FPS 49 FPS
Section 2 40 FPS 44 FPS
Section 3 29 FPS 37 FPS
Graphics score 10441 11360
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Stability 56% 84%
Graphics test 34 FPS 37 FPS
Graphics score 5827 6241
Sources: 3DMark [5], [6]
PCMark 3.0
19901
15714
Web score 21582 14928
Video editing 8625 6982
Photo editing 34425 28408
Data manipulation 17556 14424
Writing score 26844 22334
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (86th and 84th place)

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-09-29 (VortexGen)AnTuTu 123414404
📘 2026-09-06 (Trexsotiy)Battery lifeSOT 12:30 / 03:16
📘 2026-09-02 -> Mohamed_136Battery lifeSOT 8:02 / 17:11
📘 2026-08-29 (PaWK)AnTuTu 113034536
📘 2026-08-23 (Apple Slayer)AnTuTu 113254557
OnePlus 13
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-09-25 (InDominusRex)AnTuTu 123200877
📘 2026-09-22 (Keremss)Geekbench 6 CPU3032 / 9438
📘 2026-08-28 -> pavlikk69AnTuTu 113139994
📘 2026-08-23 ([006])AnTuTu 113121992
📘 2026-08-08 (Ilxom)AnTuTu 113257102

Memory

RAM
RAM size 12 GB 12 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory clock 5300 MHz 5300 MHz
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 4.0 UFS 4.0
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 16)
ROM One UI 8.0 OxygenOS 16
OS size 30.4 GB 54 GB
OS updates 7 years 4 years
Security updates 7 years 6 years

Battery

Capacity 5000 mAh 6000 mAh
Max charge power 45 W 100 W
Battery type Li-Ion Silicon-Carbon (Si/C)
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging Yes (25 W) Yes (50 W)
Reverse charging Yes, (wireless) Yes, (wireless)
Bypass charging Yes Yes
Fast charging Yes (72% in 30 min) Yes (55% in 15 min)
Full charging time 0:59 hr 0:35 hr
Battery cycles 2000 cycles 1000 cycles
Battery life tests
Web browsing 11:10 hr 13:42 hr
Watching video 19:32 hr 23:46 hr
Gaming 06:22 hr 06:05 hr
Standby 132 hr 120 hr
General battery life
28:43 hr
31:17 hr

Main camera

Matrix 200 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 16320 x 12240 8192 x 6144
Zoom Optical, 5x Optical, 3x
Flash LED Dual LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording Up to 30FPS Up to 30FPS
4K video recording Up to 120FPS Up to 60FPS
1080p video recording Up to 240FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 240 FPS (1080p) 240 FPS (1080p)
Angle of widest lens 120° 120°
Lenses 1) Standard: 200 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Telephoto: 10 MP
4) Ultrawide: 50 MP
1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Ultrawide: 50 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
Standard lens
Image resolution 200 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/1.7 f/1.6
Focal length 23 mm 23 mm
Sensor Samsung ISOCELL S5KHP2 Sony LYTIA-808
Sensor size 1/1.3" (≈ 0.77 inch) 1/1.4" (≈ 0.71 inch)
Pixel size 0.6 micron 1.12 micron
Autofocus Laser autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Optical Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/3.4 f/2.6
Focal length 111 mm 73 mm
Sensor Sony IMX854 Sony LYT-600
Sensor size 1/2.52" (≈ 0.4 inch) 1/1.95" (≈ 0.51 inch)
Pixel size 0.7 micron 0.8 micron
Stabilization Optical Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/1.9 f/2.0
Focal length 13 mm 15 mm
Sensor Samsung ISOCELL S5KJN3 Samsung S5KJN5
Sensor size 1/2.5" (≈ 0.4 inch) 1/2.75" (≈ 0.36 inch)
Pixel size 0.7 micron 0.64 micron
Stabilization Digital Digital

DxOMark main camera tests

Photo quality
Video quality
Generic main camera score
Bokeh 165 -
Preview 81 -
Zoom 137 -
Samples Photo samples of Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra from DxOMark -

Selfie camera

Megapixels 12 megapixels 32 megapixels
Image resolution 4000 x 3000 6560 x 4928
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.4
Focal length 26 mm 21 mm
Sensor Samsung S5K3LU Sony IMX615
Sensor size 1/3.2" (≈ 0.31 inch) 1/2.74" (≈ 0.36 inch)
Pixel size 1.12 micron 0.8 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 3.2 3.2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort Yes, DP 1.2 Yes
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port No Yes
Network
Number of SIM* 1 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* Yes Yes
Hybrid slot No No
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes No
Speakers test
Max loudness
93 dB
91.8 dB

Other

Category Flagship Flagship
Announced January 2025 October 2024
Release date February 2025 January 2025
Launch price (MSRP) $1299 $899
Successor - Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra - OnePlus 15
SAR (head) 1.25 W/kg -
SAR (body) 1.42 W/kg -
Sensors - Hall-effect sensor
- Barometer
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Hall-effect sensor
- Barometer
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Not included Yes, 100 W
Further details
Notes on Galaxy S25 Ultra:
    - Supports up to 2 eSIMs. The international model has 2 physical SIM slots, while the U.S. version has 1.
    - Uses Grade 5 titanium and Corning Gorilla Armor 2 glass on both sides.
Notes on OnePlus 13:
    - The "Arctic Dawn" and "Black Eclipse" models are 8.5 mm thick and weigh 213g, while "Midnight Ocean" is 8.9 mm and 210g.
    - The Chinese and Indian versions do not support eSIM.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

If the camera and sound are more important to you, then choose the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra. But if the battery life is more of a priority – go for the OnePlus 13.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
359 (26%)
1020 (74%)
Total votes: 1379

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
ComputerNerd October 9, 2025 at 11:40 PM
It is a close battle. OnePlus 13 has the bigger and better battery, it has a far better selfie front camera, and it costs drastically less. Great for general users that want power and phone gamers. The Samsung S25 Ultra has far better video recording capabilities, better main camera during the daytime for photography, a better operating system skin (One UI 8 >>> OxygenOS 15), and the S pen for signing documents. Great for hobby video editors, tourists during the daytime, managers, and IT Support.
+5 Reply
Avatar
Omer January 30, 2025 at 04:56 PM
The battery in the s25 ultra is much better because it's underperforming.I don't trust this place anymore.
+48 Reply
Avatar
Shogun of Konoha March 27, 2025 at 11:20 AM
Nope actually it's the OnePlus 13 that has better battery life due to having a bigger battery capacity and a better battery type(Silicon carbide ) plus the efficiency of the SD 8 Elite
+38 Reply
Avatar
polish August 1, 2025 at 04:33 AM
Shogun of Konoha, they both have SD 8 Elite, but the Ultra is overclocked for about 5% faster performance, nothing noticeable unless it's something that takes time to process, like if the OnePlus took 2 minuets the Samsung will take closer to 1:50, but nothing huge. Battery is more efficient on Samsung software, so the life difference is minimal. Biggest difference to me is camera and hardware (flat vs curved screen).
+7 Reply