TCL 50 5G vs Motorola Moto G84 5G
42
out of 100
VS
58
out of 100
Here we compared two mid-range smartphones: the 6.6-inch TCL 50 5G (with Mediatek Dimensity 6100 Plus) that was released on February 26, 2024, against the Motorola Moto G84 5G, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 and came out 6 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the TCL 50 5G
- Newer Bluetooth version (v5.3)
- The phone is 6 months newer
- Ready for eSIM technology
Reasons to consider the Motorola Moto G84 5G
- Has 2x more RAM: 8GB versus 4GB
- 51% higher pixel density (402 vs 267 PPI)
- Higher display refresh rate β 120 Hz
- Optical image stabilization
- 17% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (610K versus 521K)
- More recent OS version: Android 15 versus 14
- Has 2 SIM card slots
- POLED display (versus competitor's IPS LCD)
- Supports higher wattage charging (30W versus 18W)
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | POLED |
| Size | 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 pixels | 1080 x 2400 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| PPI | 267 ppi | 402 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max rated brightness | 480 nits | 1300 nits |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Touch sampling rate | - | 240 Hz |
| Screen protection | Tempered glass | Tempered glass |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.4% | 85.8% |
| Display features | - | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
| RGB color space | - | 146.4% |
| PWM | - | 90 Hz |
| Response time | - | 1 ms |
| Contrast | - | β Infinity |
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 164.1 mm (6.46 inches) | 160 mm (6.3 inches) |
| Width | 75.1 mm (2.96 inches) | 74.4 mm (2.93 inches) |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm (0.33 inches) | 7.6 mm (0.3 inches) |
| Weight | 183.5 g (6.47 oz) | 168.3 g (5.94 oz) |
| Waterproof | IP54 | IP54 |
| Rear material | Plastic | Plastic |
| Frame material | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | Gray, Blue | Blue, Red |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-button | Yes, in-display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6100 Plus | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 |
| Max clock | 2200 MHz | 2200 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 6 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A55 - 2 cores at 2.2 GHz: Cortex-A76 |
- 6 cores at 1.8 GHz: Kryo 660 Silver (Cortex-A55) - 2 cores at 2.2 GHz: Kryo 660 Gold (Cortex-A78) |
| L3 cache | 2 MB | - |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 6 nanometers | 6 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Yes | Hexagon 686 |
| Graphics | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| GPU shading units | 64 | 256 |
| GPU clock | 962 MHz | 840 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~123.1 GFLOPS | ~430.1 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | - | 1404 |
| Single-core score | 692 | 913 |
| Multi-core score | 1849 | 2030 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 200637 | 243901 |
| GPU | 55789 | 56804 |
| Memory | 114226 | 152968 |
| UX | 150629 | 156581 |
| Total score | 521281 | 610255 |
| Samples | Less than 3 | Less than 3 |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 9105 | 12401 |
| Video editing | 4322 | 4770 |
| Photo editing | 20320 | 24498 |
| Data manipulation | 7196 | 9779 |
| Writing score | 11056 | 14850 |
Recent User Tests
TCL 50 5G
No benchmark results yet
Motorola Moto G84 5G
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2025-09-06 (Vaqif) | AnTuTu 11 | 610255 |
| π 2025-08-06 (X) | Geekbench 6 GPU | 1412 |
| π 2025-08-06 (X) | Geekbench 6 CPU | 904 / 2041 |
| π 2024-07-26 (Francescolli) | Geekbench 6 GPU | 1411 |
| π 2024-07-26 (Francescolli) | Geekbench 6 CPU | 915 / 2051 |
Memory
| RAM size | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory clock | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage size | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
| Memory card max size | - | Up to 1024 GB |
Software
| Operating system | Android 14 | Android 14 (Can be upgraded to Android 15) |
| ROM | - | My UX |
| OS updates | - | 2 years |
| Security updates | - | 2 years |
Battery
| Capacity | 5010 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Max charge power | 18 W | 30 W |
| Battery type | - | Li-Po |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse charging | No | No |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes (54% in 30 min) |
| Full charging time | - | 1:15 hr |
| Web browsing | - | 10:01 hr |
| Watching video | - | 13:58 hr |
| Gaming | - | 05:09 hr |
| Standby | - | 121 hr |
General battery life
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | - | 8160 x 6144 |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | No | No |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 30FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Slow motion | - | 120 FPS (1080p) |
| Angle of widest lens | - | 120Β° |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Ultrawide: 5 MP |
1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Ultrawide: 8 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
- Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Sensor | - | Samsung ISOCELL S5KGN9 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.5" (β 0.4 inch) | 1/1.5" (β 0.67 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.7 micron | 1 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| Image resolution | 5 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Sensor | - | Samsung ISOCELL S5K4H7AF |
| Sensor size | 1/5.0" (β 0.2 inch) | 1/4.0" (β 0.25 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1.12 micron | 1.12 micron |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 8 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Image resolution | - | 4920 x 3264 |
| Aperture | - | f/2.5 |
| Sensor | - | OmniVision OV16A1Q |
| Sensor size | 1/4" (β 0.25 inch) | 1/3.06" (β 0.33 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1.12 micron | 1 micron |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.1 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS |
| NFC* | Yes | Depends on the region |
| Infrared port | No | No |
| Number of SIM* | 1 | 2 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | - | Standby |
| eSIM support* | Yes | No |
| Hybrid slot | No | Yes |
| LTE Cat* | - | 18 |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| FM radio | - | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | - | Yes |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Announced | February 2024 | August 2023 |
| Release date | April 2024 | September 2023 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $190 | $249 |
| Successor | - | - Motorola Moto G86 5G |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 18 W | Yes, 30 W |
Further details
Notes on Moto G84 5G:
- The back cover can also be made of eco-leather.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the Motorola Moto G84 5G is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 1