Tecno Camon 50 4G vs Camon 19
Here we compared two budget smartphones: the 6.78-inch Tecno Camon 50 4G (with MediaTek Helio G200 Ultimate) that was released on February 17, 2026, against the Tecno Camon 19, which is powered by MediaTek Helio G85 and came out 3 years and 8 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Tecno Camon 50 4G
- Waterproof body (IP69 classification)
- Higher display refresh rate – 144 Hz
- 94% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (595K versus 306K)
- Has 2x more RAM: 8GB versus 4GB
- Comes with 1150 mAh larger battery capacity: 6150 vs 5000 mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version (v5.3)
- Optical image stabilization
- Supports higher wattage charging (45W versus 18W)
- More recent OS version: Android 16 versus 13
- The phone is 3 years and 8 months newer
- More energy-efficient CPU – Helio G200 Ultimate
- Stereo speakers
- AMOLED display (versus competitor's IPS LCD)
Reasons to consider the Tecno Camon 19
- Includes a 3.5 mm headphone audio jack port
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| Size | 6.78 inches | 6.8 inches |
| Resolution | 1208 x 2644 pixels | 1080 x 2460 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19.5:9 | 20.5:9 |
| PPI | 429 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (60-120 Hz) | No |
| Max rated brightness | - | 500 nits |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Screen protection | Tempered glass | Tempered glass |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.1% | 88.6% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
- |
Design and build
| Height | 162.4 mm (6.39 inches) | 166.63 mm (6.56 inches) |
| Width | 77.2 mm (3.04 inches) | 74.37 mm (2.93 inches) |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm (0.3 inches) | 8.3 mm (0.33 inches) |
| Weight | 172 g (6.07 oz) | 198 g (6.98 oz) |
| Waterproof | IP69 | No |
| Rear material | Plastic | Plastic |
| Frame material | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | Black, Gray, Green, Purple | White, Black, Green |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-display | Yes, in-button |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G200 Ultimate | MediaTek Helio G85 |
| Max clock | 2200 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 6 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A55 - 2 cores at 2.2 GHz: Cortex-A76 |
- 6 cores at 1.8 GHz: Cortex-A55 - 2 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A75 |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 6 nanometers | 12 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes |
| Graphics | Mali-G57 MP2 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| GPU shading units | 64 | 48 |
| GPU clock | 1100 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~140.8 GFLOPS | ~96 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
| Single-core score | 746 | 422 |
| Multi-core score | 2020 | 1403 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 221310 | 122108 |
| GPU | 49666 | 28982 |
| Memory | 162091 | 60326 |
| UX | 162309 | 95457 |
| Total score | 595376 | 306873 |
| Samples | [3 tests] | Less than 3 |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | - | 8217 |
| Video editing | - | 6356 |
| Photo editing | - | 16469 |
| Data manipulation | - | 5286 |
| Writing score | - | 9061 |
Recent User Tests
Tecno Camon 50 4G
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-08-07 (Yann) | AnTuTu 11 | 595376 |
| 📘 2026-07-23 (gOosetech) | AnTuTu 11 | 586886 |
| 📘 2026-05-29 (Badass) | AnTuTu 11 | 600824 |
Tecno Camon 19
No benchmark results yet
Memory
| RAM size | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory clock | 2133 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage size | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
| Memory card max size | Up to 1024 GB | Up to 512 GB |
Software
| Operating system | Android 16 | Android 12 (Can be upgraded to Android 13) |
| ROM | HIOS 16 | HIOS 13 |
| OS updates | 3 years | - |
Battery
| Capacity | 6150 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Max charge power | 45 W | 18 W |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse charging | Yes | No |
| Fast charging | Yes (44% in 30 min) | Yes (50% in 60 min) |
| Full charging time | 1:18 hr | 2:33 hr |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 megapixels | 64 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8192 x 6144 | 9000 x 7000 |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | Dual LED | Quad LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | No | No |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 30FPS | Up to 30FPS |
| Angle of widest lens | 112° | - |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Ultrawide: 8 MP |
1) Standard: 64 MP 2) Depth: 2 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
- Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 64 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.7 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | 26 mm |
| Sensor size | 1/1.56" (≈ 0.64 inch) | 1/1.7" (≈ 0.59 inch) |
| Pixel size | - | 0.8 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| Image resolution | 8 MP | - |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | - |
| Focal length | 14 mm | - |
| Stabilization | Digital | - |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 32 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Image resolution | - | 4920 x 3264 |
| Aperture | f/2.5 | f/2.0 |
| Sensor | CMOS | CMOS |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | - |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo |
| NFC* | Yes | Depends on the region |
| Infrared port | Yes | No |
| Number of SIM* | 2 | 2 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
| eSIM support* | No | No |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| LTE Cat* | - | 7 |
| 5G support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Mono |
| Headphone audio jack | No | Yes |
| FM radio | Yes | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Other
| Category | Budget | Budget |
| Announced | February 2026 | June 2022 |
| Release date | March 2026 | July 2022 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | - | $185 |
| Successor | - | - Tecno Camon 50 4G |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Accelerometer - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Proximity sensor - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 45 W | Yes, 18 W |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the Tecno Camon 50 4G is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: < 1