Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra vs Oppo Find X9s Pro

93 out of 100
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
VS
91 out of 100
Oppo Find X9s Pro

Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.85-inch Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5) that was released on February 4, 2026, against the Oppo Find X9s Pro, which is powered by MediaTek Dimensity 9500 and came out 3 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
  • Has a 0.53 inch larger screen size
  • 41% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (4602K versus 3274K)
  • Delivers 39% higher peak brightness (1529 against 1099 nits)
  • Has 33% more RAM: 16GB versus 12GB
  • The rear camera has a 3x optical zoom
  • 10% higher pixel density (508 vs 460 PPI)
  • Supports higher wattage charging (100W versus 80W)
  • 9% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 3615 and 3302 points
  • Ready for eSIM technology
Reasons to consider the Oppo Find X9s Pro
  • Newer Bluetooth version (v6.1)
  • Slow-motion recording at 480FPS
  • Better grip in hands – the body is 5.1 mm narrower
  • Weighs 29 grams less

Review

Evaluation of Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra and Oppo Find X9s Pro crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
πŸ“± Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
16 / 256 GB
VS
12 / 256 GB
62.9
(Average)
Value Index
67.0
(Good)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests

Display

Type AMOLED AMOLED
Size 6.85 inches 6.32 inches
Resolution 1440 x 3168 pixels 1216 x 2640 pixels
Aspect ratio 19.8:9 19.5:9
PPI 508 ppi 460 ppi
Refresh rate 144 Hz 144 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes Yes
Max rated brightness 2600 nits 1800 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 8000 nits 3600 nits
HDR support Yes, HDR10+ Yes, Dolby Vision
Touch sampling rate 475 Hz 300 Hz
Screen protection Tempered glass Gorilla Glass Victus 2
Screen-to-body ratio 90.7% 90.9%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
- DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
Display tests
RGB color space 100% 99.4%
PWM 120 Hz 167 Hz
Response time 1 ms 3 ms
Contrast ∞ Infinity ∞ Infinity
Screen space comparison
iQOO 15 Ultra
6.85β€³ (19.8:9 ratio) = 17.7 in2
Find X9s Pro
6.32β€³ (19.5:9 ratio) = 15.2 in2
~16% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
1529 nits
1099 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3], [4]

Design and build

Height 163.65 mm (6.44 inches) 150.5 mm (5.93 inches)
Width 76.8 mm (3.02 inches) 71.7 mm (2.82 inches)
Thickness 8.7 mm (0.34 inches) 8.4 mm (0.33 inches)
Weight 227 g (8.01 oz) 198 g (6.98 oz)
Waterproof IP69 IP69
Advanced cooling Active fan Vapor chamber
Rear material Glass Glass
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors Black, Silver White, Gray, Blue, Orange
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Screen-to-body ratio

Performance

Chipset specifications of Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra and Oppo Find X9s Pro
SoC
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 MediaTek Dimensity 9500
Max clock 4610 MHz 4210 MHz
CPU cores 8 (2 + 6) 8 (1 + 3 + 4)
Architecture - 6 cores at 3.63 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Performance
- 2 cores at 4.74 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Prime
- 4 cores at 2.7 GHz: C1-Pro
- 3 cores at 3.5 GHz: C1-Premium
- 1 core at 4.21 GHz: C1-Ultra
L3 cache 12 MB 16 MB
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 3 nanometers 3 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon MediaTek NPU 990
GPU
Graphics Adreno 840 Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12
GPU shading units 1536 1536
GPU clock 1300 MHz 1716 MHz
FLOPS ~3993.6 GFLOPS ~5271.5 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra and Oppo Find X9s Pro
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
3615
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
11366
10598
Compute Score (GPU)
Compute Score (GPU) 27924 -
Single-core score 3615 3302
Multi-core score 11366 10598
Sources: Geekbench [3]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
4602290
3274090
CPU 1102292 909385
GPU 1604604 1204662
Memory 789150 403028
UX 1106244 757015
Total score 4602290 3274090
Samples [3 tests] Less than 3
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Stability 68% -
Graphics test 23 FPS -
Graphics score 3081 -
3DMark Solar Bay
Graphics test 54 FPS -
Section 1 60 FPS -
Section 2 55 FPS -
Section 3 46 FPS -
Graphics score 14183 -
Sources: 3DMark [5]
PCMark 3.0
Web score 18545 -
Video editing 6849 -
Photo editing 34832 -
Data manipulation 14303 -
Writing score 28711 -
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (8th and 58th place)

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-30 (NPT)Geekbench 6 CPU3568 / 11293
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-04 (Khamidovv)AnTuTu 114602290
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-04 (Khamidovv)AnTuTu 114651882
πŸ“˜ 2026-02-08 (z strikes again)AnTuTu 114314224
Oppo Find X9s Pro
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-27 (zwatoo)AnTuTu 113274090

Memory

RAM
RAM size 16 GB 12 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 4.1 UFS 4.1
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 16 Android 16
ROM OriginOS 6 ColorOS 16
OS size 96 GB 58 GB
OS updates 5 years 5 years
Security updates 5 years 6 years

Battery

Capacity 7400 mAh 7025 mAh
Max charge power 100 W 80 W
Battery type Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) Silicon-Carbon (Si/C)
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging Yes (40 W) Yes (50 W)
Reverse charging Yes, (wireless) Yes, (wireless)
Bypass charging Yes Yes
Fast charging Yes (50% in 24 min) Yes
Full charging time 1:06 hr -

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 200 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 -
Zoom Optical, 3x Optical, 2.8x
Flash Dual LED LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording Up to 30FPS Up to 30FPS
4K video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 120FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 240FPS
Slow motion 240 FPS (1080p) 480 FPS (720p)
Angle of widest lens 107Β° 120Β°
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Ultrawide: 50 MP
1) Standard: 200 MP
2) Telephoto: 200 MP
3) Ultrawide: 50 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 200 MP
Aperture f/1.9 f/1.6
Focal length 23 mm 23 mm
Sensor Sony IMX921 Samsung ISOCELL HP9
Sensor size 1/1.56" (β‰ˆ 0.64 inch) 1/1.4" (β‰ˆ 0.71 inch)
Pixel size 1 micron -
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Optical Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution 50 MP 200 MP
Aperture f/2.7 f/2.6
Focal length 85 mm 65 mm
Sensor Sony IMX882 Samsung ISOCELL HP5
Sensor size 1/1.95" (β‰ˆ 0.51 inch) 1/1.56" (β‰ˆ 0.64 inch)
Pixel size 0.8 micron -
Stabilization Optical Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/2.1 f/2.0
Focal length 15 mm 15 mm
Sensor - Samsung ISOCELL JN5
Sensor size 1/2.76" (β‰ˆ 0.36 inch) 1/2.76" (β‰ˆ 0.36 inch)
Pixel size 0.64 micron -
Stabilization Digital Digital

Selfie camera

Megapixels 32 megapixels 32 megapixels
Image resolution 6528 x 4896 -
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.4
Focal length 21 mm 21 mm
Sensor CMOS -
Sensor size 1/3.1" (β‰ˆ 0.32 inch) -
Pixel size 0.7 micron -
Autofocus No Phase autofocus
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 6.0 6.1
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 3.2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort Yes No
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port Yes Yes
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* Yes No
Hybrid slot No No
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes -
Speakers test
Max loudness
91.18 dB
84.7 dB

Other

Category Flagship Flagship
Announced February 2026 April 2026
Release date February 2026 May 2026
Launch price (MSRP) $849 $780
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Yes, 100 W Yes, 80 W
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

These smartphones have a lot in common, but we would recommend the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra. It has a better connectivity and sound.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
2 (50%)
2 (50%)
Total votes: 4

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!